Accessibility and spatial distribution of general practice services in an Australian city by levels of social disadvantage.

The accessibility and spatial distribution of health services provided by the main source of primary medical care in Australia--the general practice surgery--was investigated by level of social disadvantage of local catchment areas. All 459 general practice surgeries in Perth, an Australian city of 1.2 million residents, were surveyed with a 94% response. Amount of service provision was measured using weekly doctor-hours, available from consulting rooms during opening hours, and associated nurse-hours of service. Access factors were defined as the distance to the nearest surgery, provision of Sunday and evening services, ease of making a same day appointment, bulk-billing, and whether the surgery offered a choice of gender of doctor. There were relatively more surgeries in disadvantaged areas and doctor-hours of service provision were also greater (41.0 h/1,000 most disadvantaged vs. 37.9 h/1000 least disadvantaged). Bulk-billing care, at no direct cost to the patient, was more likely to be provided in most disadvantaged areas compared with least disadvantaged areas (61 vs. 38%). However, populations living in the most disadvantaged areas were less likely to be able to see the local GP at short notice (91 vs. 95%), to have access to a local female GP (56 vs. 62%) or a local service in the evenings (42 vs. 51%). While the overall picture of accessibility was favourable, there was considerable variation in the type of services provided to different socioeconomic groups. Health care planners should investigate the reasons for these differences and advise Government to ensure that access factors affecting publicly funded services are equitably distributed.

Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether public response to an invitation to attend mammography screening can be increased by strategic relocation of the clinics. METHODS: Women invited to attend mammography screening were classified by attendance, socioeconomic status, and distance from their screening clinic. A geographic information system was used to investigate whether the response could be increased by relocating clinics to facilitate access. SETTING: The metropolitan city of Perth in Western Australia with six fixed site, publicly funded, mammography screening clinics. MAIN RESULTS: Women from disadvantaged areas, not screened previously by the mammography screening programme, had a higher response to an invitation to attend screening if they lived within 3 km of their closest clinics (12%) than if they lived further away (8%). Theoretically, the response of the target population could be increased if the existing clinics were replaced by six new clinics located closer to disadvantaged areas. CONCLUSIONS: Public health planners should be aware of the use of geographic information systems to model optimum locations of health care facilities, and be willing to assess the potential target population response to those locations.

Differential effects on socioeconomic groups of modelling the location of mammography screening clinics using Geographic Information Systems.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate spatial access to mammography clinics and to investigate whether relocating clinics can improve global access. To determine whether any change in access is distributed equitably between different social groups. METHODS: The study was undertaken in Perth, Western Australia in 1996. It was an analysis of travel distances to mammography clinics, comparing distances to the pattern of existing clinics and modelled relocated clinics. The study population was the 151,162 women aged 40-64 years resident in Perth in 1991. RESULTS: Overall travel distances to the existing clinics was reduced by 14% when a GIS system was used to relocate them so as to minimise the travel distance for all women. The travel distance of the most disadvantaged groups fell by 2% and by 24% for the least disadvantaged group. CONCLUSIONS: GIS modelling can be used to advantage to evaluate potential locations for screening clinics that improve the access for the target population, however global analysis should be supplemented by analysis of special groups to ensure that no group is disadvantaged by the proposal. IMPLICATIONS: If new technology is not used to evaluate the placement of health services, population travel distances may be greater than necessary, with possible impacts on attendance rates.

A comparison of measures of access to child health clinics and the implications for modelling the location of new clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether measurement of access to existing child health clinics, and modelled location of new clinics, was affected by the spatial definitions of the target population. METHOD: Populations requiring childhood screening services were defined as located at individual households, and at geographic and population-weighted centroids of small and large areas. Straight-line and network distances were measured and compared from these origins to varying numbers of existing clinics. The same origins were used to model sets of locations for new clinics, and access levels were again compared. RESULTS: Travel distances for 82,499 annual baby-visits to 140 existing clinics were between 136,000 km and 84,000 km, depending on origin definition. An analysis based on small area centroid data was as accurate as one based on household data. Planning solutions for new clinics located on the basis of few large areas, with populations centred at spatially defined centroids, resulted in poorer access for the population (231,000 km of travel) than one based on many small areas with populations centred at population weighted centroids (194,000 km of travel). IMPLICATIONS: Public access to health facilities will be improved if decisions about their locations are aided by the application of spatial analysis techniques based on small area definitions.

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote cervical screening in general practice.

A cost-effectiveness study of three different interventions to promote the uptake of screening for cervical cancer in general practice was carried out in Perth in 1991. Women eligible for a Pap smear were randomly allocated to one of four groups: one receiving letters with specific appointments to attend a screening clinic staffed by female doctors, one receiving letters informing them of the availability of the clinic and suggesting they make an appointment, one whose files were tagged to remind a doctor to offer a smear during a consultation, and a comparison control group that received opportunistic screening only. Variable and fixed costs for each group were itemised and summarised to give an average cost per smear taken. The cost and effectiveness of each intervention were then compared with those of the control group. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the major component of the costs, the doctor's time. Opportunistic screening cost $14.60 per smear and attained 16 per cent recruitment. Tagging files was the cheapest intervention ($14.75 per smear) although it was the least effective in recruiting women (20 per cent). This result held true for different scenarios of doctor's time allocated. Intervention by invitation letter with no appointment cost $45.35 per smear and attained 26 per cent recruitment, and intervention with a specific appointment cost $48.21 per smear and attained 30 per cent recruitment. Compared with the control group, the incremental cost-effectiveness for the tagged group was $15.40, for the letter-without-appointment group $97.75 and for the letter-with-appointment group $86.50.

Cervical cancer screening for hospital inpatients: report of an intervention study.

A pilot study of a cervical cancer screening service was carried out at a major teaching hospital in Perth. The service, for women inpatients aged 20 to 69 years, was staffed by a women's health nurse. The effect of providing the service (service) was compared with giving a leaflet on Pap smears to eligible women (education) and with no intervention (control). Of 517 women in the service group, 184 (36 per cent) needed a Pap smear and were well enough to be offered screening; only 29 of 184 (16 per cent) refused and 132 of 184 (72 per cent) were screened. Of those screened, 29 per cent had never had a Pap smear. Information on women in the education and control groups was obtained by mailed questionnaire. Of the eligible women in the service group, 72 per cent accepted screening in hospital, but only 24 per cent of eligible women in the education group and 20 per cent in the control group reported having a Pap smear in the four months since leaving hospital. The service group showed a very large effect relative to the control group (odds ratio (OR) 17.71, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 10.05 to 31.22), but there was no significant difference between the education and control groups. Other significant variables in the logistic regression model were age, marital status, and sex of the woman's general practitioner. The effect of offering the service was greater for women over 50 (OR 51.51, CI 19.01 to 139.60) A hospital-based cervical screening service provides an important opportunity for screening women who are not being reached by other services.

Misclassification of social disadvantage based on geographical areas: comparison of postcode and collector's district analyses.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of socioeconomic status (SES), defined on the basis of geographical area, will always be subject to misclassification of individuals. We studied the relationship between SES and selected health-related measures when SES was defined firstly on the basis of postcode and secondly on the basis of the smaller spatial area of collector's district (CD). METHOD: A Census population of 1.4 million was used to investigate the misclassification of individuals to SES group using postcode as opposed to CD. A field survey of 1000 respondents and a mortality register of 1756 deaths were used to compare the relationship between SES and certain outcome variables, when SES group was assigned using postcode and CD. Misclassification probability matrices were used to try to adjust the postcode-based results to approximate CD-based results. RESULTS: The Census data showed that nearly 50% of residents were misclassified into SES groups by the postcode-based system compared with a CD-based system. In comparing the most socially disadvantaged group with the least disadvantaged group, the postcode analysis underestimated the absolute effects of SES by 58% for the increased prevalence of smoking, by 19% for the reduced prevalence of participation in junior sporting clubs and by 13% for the increased mortality rate at ages 0-64 years. Adjustment of postcode-based results using misclassification matrices proved fruitless due to differential misclassification and technical difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Misclassification of individuals to SES groups on the basis of postcode has caused an underestimation of the true relationship between SES and health-related measures. A reduction of this misclassification by using smaller spatial areas, such as CD or census enumeration districts, will provide improved validity in estimating the true relationship.

Short arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures.

Ten years' clinical experience with below-elbow plaster cast treatment of distal one third pediatric forearm fractures was subjected to an independent retrospective radiographic review. In the study population of 761 fractures, no significant displacement occurred while the forearm remained in plaster. The average angulation change was 4.5 degrees (SD +/- 2.2 degrees). In each angulation change > 5 degrees, poor cast molding was evident, as reflected by a high "cast index" (p < 0.01). Although this technique is technically demanding, excellent results are obtained in all distal pediatric forearm fractures if proper cast molding is used.

Cubitus varus: significant factors.

For better understanding of the etiology of "post-supracondylar fracture cubitus varus," an in vitro anatomic experiment was performed. Elbow models were precisely photographed in 256 combinations of 10 degrees increments of varus angulation, posterior angulation, internal rotation, and/or flexion contracture. Varus angulation was the most important single factor contributing to deformity. Addition of flexion contracture or posterior angulation to a given varus angulation decreased apparent deformity, whereas addition of internal rotation worsened the deformity. Control of varus angulation in the clinical setting, by whatever method, should minimize post-supracondylar fracture cubitus varus.

Scoliosis: facts and fiction for the family physician.

Idiopathic scoliosis is a common deformity in the adolescent age group. It is now known to be a hereditary condition, demanding careful family scrutiny. Furthermore, studies of the natural history have proven its serious long term consequences. As spinal curvatures may progress insidiously and relentlessly, early diagnosis becomes the hallmark of management. Mass screening for spinal curvatures by family physicians and medical resource personnel is recommended as a practical approach to early definition of this problem.