Growth rates of Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts hinder their ability to compete with Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch corn mash fermentations.

Growth rates determined by linear regression analysis revealed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae consistently grew more rapidly than Brettanomyces yeasts under a wide array of batch fermentative conditions, including acetic acid stress, in normal gravity (ca. 20 degrees Plato) mashes made from ground corn. Brettanomyces yeasts only grew more rapidly than S. cerevisiae when acetic acid concentrations were elevated to industrially irrelevant levels (>0.45%, w/v). Furthermore, the three Brettanomyces isolates used in this study failed to produce significant quantities of acetic acid under pure culture fermentative conditions. In fact, the small amounts of acetic acid which accumulated in pure culture fermentations of whole corn mash were below the concentration required to inhibit the growth and metabolism of S. cerevisiae. Acetic acid concentrations in pure culture Brettanomyces fermentations exceeded 0.05% (w/v) only in media containing low levels of glucose (<4%, w/v) or when aeration rates were elevated to at least 0.03 vol. air vol.-1 mash min-1. Consequently, it was concluded that Brettanomyces yeasts would not be capable of competing with S. cerevisiae in industrial batch fermentations of whole corn mash based solely on growth rates, nor would they be capable of producing inhibitory concentrations of acetic acid in such fermentations.

Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

Acetic acid (167 mM) and lactic acid (548 mM) completely inhibited growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae both in minimal medium and in media which contained supplements, such as yeast extract, corn steep powder, or a mixture of amino acids. However, the yeast grew when the pH of the medium containing acetic acid or lactic acid was adjusted to 4.5, even though the medium still contained the undissociated form of either acid at a concentration of 102 mM. The results indicated that the buffer pair formed when the pH was adjusted to 4.5 stabilized the pH of the medium by sequestering protons and by lessening the negative impact of the pH drop on yeast growth, and it also decreased the difference between the extracellular and intracellular pH values (Delta(pH)), the driving force for the intracellular accumulation of acid. Increasing the undissociated acetic acid concentration at pH 4.5 to 163 mM by raising the concentration of the total acid to 267 mM did not increase inhibition. It is suggested that this may be the direct result of decreased acidification of the cytosol because of the intracellular buffering by the buffer pair formed from the acid already accumulated. At a concentration of 102 mM undissociated acetic acid, the yeast grew to higher cell density at pH 3.0 than at pH 4.5, suggesting that it is the total concentration of acetic acid (104 mM at pH 3.0 and 167 mM at pH 4.5) that determines the extent of growth inhibition, not the concentration of undissociated acid alone.

Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and selected strains of lactobacilli regarding cell viabilities, and production of organic acids and ethanol during fermentation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Corn mashes were inoculated with yeasts and selected strains of lactobacilli, and fermented in batch or semi-continuous (cascade) mode. Ethanolic fermentation rates and viabilities of yeast were not affected by lactobacilli unless the mash was pre-cultured with lactobacilli. Then, yeast growth was inhibited and the production of ethanol was reduced by as much as 22%. CONCLUSION: Yeasts inhibited the multiplication of lactobacilli and this resulted in reduced production of acetic and lactic acids. The self-regulating nature of the cascade system allowed the yeast to recover, even when the lactobacilli had a head start, and reduced the size of the population of the contaminating Lactobacillus to a level which had an insignificant effect on fermentation rate or ethanol yield. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Contamination during fermentation is normally taken care of by the large yeast inoculum, although yeast growth and fermentation rates could be adversely affected by the presence of high numbers of lactobacilli in incoming mash or in transfer lines.

Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.

Normal-gravity (22 to 24 degrees Plato) wheat mashes were inoculated with five industrially important strains of lactobacilli at approximately 10(5), approximately 10(6), approximately 10(7), approximately 10(8), and approximately 10(9) CFU/ml in order to study the effects of the lactobacilli on yeast growth and ethanol productivity. Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus #3, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus fermentum were used. Controls with yeast cells but no bacterial inoculation and additional treatments with bacteria alone inoculated at approximately 10(7) CFU/ml of mash were included. Decreased ethanol yields were due to the diversion of carbohydrates for bacterial growth and the production of lactic acid. As higher numbers of the bacteria were produced (depending on the strain), 1 to 1.5% (wt/vol) lactic acid resulted in the case of homofermentative organisms. L. fermentum, a heterofermentative organism, produced only 0.5% (wt/vol) lactic acid. When L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. fermentum were inoculated at approximately 10(6) CFU/ml, an approximately 2% decrease in the final ethanol concentration was observed. Smaller initial numbers (only 10(5) CFU/ml) of L. paracasei or Lactobacillus #3 were sufficient to cause more than 2% decreases in the final ethanol concentrations measured compared to the control. Such effects after an inoculation of only 10(5) CFU/ml may have been due to the higher tolerance to ethanol of the latter two bacteria, to the more rapid adaptation (shorter lag phase) of these two industrial organisms to fermentation conditions, and/or to their more rapid growth and metabolism. When up to 10(9) CFU of bacteria/ml was present in mash, approximately 3.8 to 7.6% reductions in ethanol concentration occurred depending on the strain. Production of lactic acid and a suspected competition with yeast cells for essential growth factors in the fermenting medium were the major reasons for reductions in yeast growth and final ethanol yield when lactic acid bacteria were present.

Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation.

The antibiotic virginiamycin was investigated for its effects on growth and lactic acid production by seven strains of lactobacilli during the alcoholic fermentation of wheat mash by yeast. The lowest concentration of virginiamycin tested (0.5 mg Lactrol kg-1 mash), was effective against most of the lactic acid bacteria under study, but Lactobacillus plantarum was not significantly inhibited at this concentration. The use of virginiamycin prevented or reduced potential yield losses of up to 11% of the produced ethanol due to the growth and metabolism of lactobacilli. However, when the same concentration of virginiamycin was added to mash not inoculated with yeast, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. paracasei grew after an extensive lag of 48 h and L. plantarum grew after a similar lag even in the presence of 2 mg virginiamycin kg-1 mash. Results showed a variation in sensitivity to virginiamycin between the different strains tested and also a possible reduction in effectiveness of virginiamycin over prolonged incubation in wheat mash, especially in the absence of yeast.

Effects of particulate materials and osmoprotectants on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The effects of osmoprotectants (such as glycine betaine and proline) and particulate materials on the fermentation of very high concentrations of glucose by the brewing strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae (uvarum) NCYC 1324 were studied. The yeast growing at 20 degrees C consumed only 15 g of the sugar per 100 ml from a minimal medium which initially contained 35% (wt/vol) glucose. Supplementing the medium with a mixture of glycine betaine, glycine, and proline increased the amount of sugar fermented to 30.5 g/100 ml. With such supplementation, the viability of the yeast cells was maintained above 80% throughout the fermentation, while it dropped to less than 12% in the unsupplemented controls. Among single additives, glycine was more effective than proline or glycine betaine. On incubating the cultures for 10 days, the viability decreased to only 55% with glycine, while it dropped to 36 and 27%, respectively, with glycine betaine and proline. It is suggested that glycine and proline, known to be poor nitrogen sources for growth, may serve directly or indirectly as osmoprotectants. Nutrients such as tryptone, yeast extract, and a mixture of purine and pyrimidine bases increased the sugar uptake and ethanol production but did not allow the population to maintain the high level of cell viability. While only 43% of the sugar was fermented in unsupplemented medium, the presence of particulate materials such as wheat bran, wheat mash insolubles, alumina, and soy flour increased sugar utilization to 68, 75, 81, and 82%, respectively.

Effect of paracrystalline protein surface layers on predation by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus.

We determined that paracrystalline protein surface arrays (S layers) protected gram-negative eubacteria from predation by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Aquaspirillum serpens VHA and MW5 and Aquaspirillum sinuosum were resistant to predation by B. bacteriovorus 6-5-S when fully covered by their S layers. The S layer of Aeromonas salmonicida A449 protected the cells from predication by B. bacteriovorus 109J. A predacious, plaque-forming vibrio that lysed an S-layer- variant of Caulobacter crescentus but was not predacious on the parental strain which possessed an S layer was isolated from raw sewage. Since S layers are stable components of many bacterial surfaces in nature, they can provide this protective function in both aquatic and terrestrial habitats where Bdellovibrio spp. are found.