Association Between FEV1 Decline Rate and Mortality in Long-Term Follow-Up of a 21-Patient Pilot Clinical Trial of Inhaled Liposomal Cyclosporine Plus Standard-of-Care Versus Standard-of-Care Alone for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND The association between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) trajectory and mortality in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is not well defined. Using long-term data from a prior clinical trial of inhaled liposomal cyclosporine A (L-CsA-I) for lung transplant patients with BOS, this study examined the association between longitudinal FEV1 change and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed long-term data from a clinical trial which randomized 21 patients with BOS (³20% decrease in FEV1 from personal maximum) to receive L-CsA-I plus standard-of-care (n=11) or standard-of-care (SOC) alone (n=10) for 24 weeks. A joint statistical model, combining a linear mixed model for FEV1 change and Cox regression for mortality, was utilized to examine the overall association between FEV1 trajectory and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS The 21 trial participants (10 single, 11 double lung recipients) had a mean FEV1 of 1.7±0.6 Liters at randomization. Median follow-up post-randomization was 35 months. In joint model analysis, 1 percent FEV1 decline predicted 1.076-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval: -0.998 to 1.160, p=0.058). FEV1 decline was reduced by 2.6% per year in L-CsA-I patients compared to SOC (p=0.210), and overall survival at 1/3/5 years was 91%/64%/27% vs 90%/20%/0% for L-CsA-I versus SOC, respectively (p=0.164). CONCLUSIONS In BOS patients, greater longitudinal FEV1 decline predicts increased mortality. Trends towards prolonged stabilization of FEV1 and improved survival were observed with L-CsA-I receipt. Further analyses will aid in evaluating the utility of FEV1 change as a survival predictor, having implications in BOS management and future trial design.

Lung Transplantation in a New Era in the Field of Cystic Fibrosis.

Lung transplantation for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) is a critical therapeutic option, in a disease without a cure to this day, and its overall success in this population is evident. The medical advancements in knowledge, treatment, and clinical care in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) rapidly expanded and improved over the last several decades, starting from early pathology reports of CF organ involvement in 1938, to the identification of the CF gene in 1989. Lung transplantation for CF has been performed since 1983, and CF now accounts for about 17% of pre-transplantation diagnoses in lung transplantation recipients. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have been the latest new therapeutic modality addressing the underlying CF protein defect with the first modulator, ivacaftor, approved in 2012. Fast forward to today, and we now have a growing CF population. More than half of PwCF are now adults, and younger patients face a better life expectancy than they ever did before. Unfortunately, CFTR modulator therapy is not effective in all patients, and efficacy varies among patients; it is not a cure, and CF remains a progressive disease that leads predominantly to respiratory failure. Lung transplantation remains a lifesaving treatment for this disease. Here, we reviewed the current knowledge of lung transplantation in PwCF, the challenges associated with its implementation, and the ongoing changes to the field as we enter a new era in the care of PwCF. Improved life expectancy in PwCF will surely influence the role of transplantation in patient care and may even lead to a change in the demographics of which people benefit most from transplantation.

Prophylactic epinephrine attenuates severe bleeding in lung transplantation patients undergoing transbronchial lung biopsy: Results of the PROPHET randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe hemorrhage is an uncommon yet potentially life-threatening complication of transbronchial lung biopsy. Lung transplantation recipients undergo multiple bronchoscopies with biopsy and are considered to be at an increased risk for bleeding from transbronchial biopsy, independent of traditional risk factors. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial administration of prophylactic topical epinephrine in attenuating transbronchial biopsy-related hemorrhage in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: The Prophylactic Epinephrine for the Prevention of Transbronchial Lung Biopsy-related Bleeding in Lung Transplant Recipients study was a 2-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants undergoing transbronchial lung biopsy were randomized to receive 1:10,000-diluted topical epinephrine vs saline placebo administered prophylactically into the target segmental airway. Bleeding was graded based on a clinical severity scale. The primary efficacy outcome was incidence of severe or very severe hemorrhage. The primary safety outcome was a composite of 3-hours all-cause mortality and an acute cardiovascular event. RESULTS: A total of 66 lung transplantation recipients underwent 100 bronchoscopies during the study period. The primary outcome of severe or very severe hemorrhage occurred in 4 cases (8%) in the prophylactic epinephrine group and in 13 cases (24%) in the control group (p = 0.04). The composite primary safety outcome did not occur in any of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: In lung transplantation recipients undergoing transbronchial lung biopsy, prophylactic administration of 1:10,000-diluted topical epinephrine into the target segmental airway before biopsy attenuates the incidence of significant endobronchial hemorrhage without conveying a significant cardiovascular risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03126968).

Clinical features and allograft failure rates of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection categories.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) consensus criteria categorize AMR by diagnostic certainty. This study aims to define the clinical features and associated outcomes of these recently defined AMR categories. METHODS: Adjudication committees reviewed clinical data of 335 lung transplant recipients to define clinical or subclinical AMR based on the presence of allograft dysfunction, and the primary endpoints, time from transplant to allograft failure, a composite endpoint of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and/or death. Clinical AMR was subcategorized based on diagnostic certainty as definite, probable or possible AMR if 4, 3, or 2 characteristic features were present, respectively. Allograft injury was assessed via plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA). Risk of allograft failure and allograft injury was compared for AMR categories using regression models. RESULTS: Over the 38.5 months follow-up, 28.7% of subjects developed clinical AMR (n = 96), 18.5% developed subclinical AMR (n = 62) or 58.3% were no AMR (n = 177). Clinical AMR showed higher risk of allograft failure and ddcfDNA levels compared to subclinical or no AMR. Clinical AMR included definite/probable (n = 21) or possible AMR (n = 75). These subcategories showed similar clinical characteristics, ddcfDNA levels, and risk of allograft failure. However, definite/probable AMR showed greater measures of AMR severity, including degree of allograft dysfunction and risk of death compared to possible AMR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical AMR showed greater risk of allograft failure than subclinical AMR or no AMR. Subcategorization of clinical AMR based on diagnostic certainty correlated with AMR severity and risk of death, but not with the risk of allograft failure.

Treatment of hyperammonemia using in-line renal replacement and hyperosmolar therapies within an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit.

After orthotopic lung transplantation, hyperammonemia can be a rare complication secondary to infection by organisms that produce urease or inhibit the urea cycle. This can cause neurotoxicity, cerebral edema, and seizures. Ammonia is unique in that it has a large volume of distribution. However, it is also readily dialyzable given its small molecular weight. As such, removal of ammonia requires renal replacement modalities that can both rapidly remove ammonia from the plasma space and allow for continuous removal to prevent rebound accumulation from intracellular stores. Prevention of iatrogenic osmotic lowering in this setting is required to prevent worsening of cerebral edema. Herein, we describe use of sequential in-line renal replacement therapy using both intermittent hemodialysis and continuous venovenous hemofiltration within an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit in conjunction with higher sodium dialysate and 7.5% hypertonic saline to achieve these treatment goals.

Biological Variation of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Stable Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrate that donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in lung transplant recipients may serve as a marker of allograft injury for detecting allograft rejection and infection. Clinical interpretation of dd-cfDNA requires understanding its biological variation in stable lung transplant patients in order to identify abnormal results suggesting underlying allograft dysfunction. This study establishes the biological variation and reference change values (RCV) of dd-cfDNA in stable lung transplant recipients using an analytically validated assay with an established analytic coefficient of variation (CVA). METHODS: The AlloSure® assay, a targeted, sequencing-based approach, was used to measure plasma dd-cfDNA in a cohort of lung transplant patients at 4 centers that used dd-cfDNA to monitor for allograft dysfunction in preference to surveillance transbronchial biopsy. Patients with stable allograft function and ≥3 dd-cfDNA samples were included. Intraindividual coefficient of variation (CVI), interindividual CV (CVG), index of individuality (II) and the RCV were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a combined 124 dd-cfDNA samples were included in the final analysis. The median dd-cfDNA was 0.31% (interquartile range 0.18%-0.68%), the 97.5th percentile and 95th percentile were 1.3% and 1.0%, respectively. In 30 stable patients with an average of 3.7 tests, the CVI was 25%, CVG 19%, II 1.33, and RCV 70%. CONCLUSION: In stable lung transplant patients, fluctuations in dd-cfDNA levels of up to 70% or levels less than 1% are within normal biological variation. With further validation, these thresholds may be incorporated into surveillance monitoring algorithms to identify potentially abnormal results indicating allograft dysfunction.

Integrated cell-free DNA and cytokine analysis uncovers distinct tissue injury and immune response patterns in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 pathogenesis is associated with an exuberant inflammatory response. However, the tissue injury pattern and immune response in solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) taking immunosuppressive therapy have not been well characterized. Here, we perform both cfDNA and cytokine profiling on plasma samples to map tissue damage, including allograft injury and delineate underlying immunopathology. We identified injuries from multiple-tissue types, including hematopoietic cells, vascular endothelium, hepatocyte, adipocyte, pancreas, kidney, heart, and lung in SOTRs with COVID-19 that correlates with disease severity. SOTRs with COVID-19 have higher plasma levels of cytokines such as IFN-λ1, IFN-γ, IL-15, IL-18 IL-1RA, IL-6, MCP-2, and TNF-α as compared to healthy controls, and the levels of GM-CSF, IL-15, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were associated with disease severity in SOTRs. Strikingly, IFN-λ and IP-10 were markedly increased in SOTRs compared to immunocompetent patients with COVID-19. Correlation analyses showed a strong association between monocyte-derived cfDNA and inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in SOTRs with COVID-19. Moreover, compared to other respiratory viral infections, COVID-19 induced pronounced injury in hematopoietic, vascular endothelial and endocrine tissues. Allograft injury, measured as donor-derived cfDNA was elevated in SOTRs with COVID-19, including allografts distant from the primary site of infection. Allograft injury correlated with inflammatory cytokines and cfDNA from immune cells. Furthermore, longitudinal analysis identified a gradual decrease of cfDNA and inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with a favorable outcome. Our findings highlight distinct tissue injury and cytokine features in SOTRs with COVID-19 that correlate with disease severity.

Spirometry testing for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridge to transplant patients.

PURPOSE: ECMO can provide a bridge to transplantation and improve survival for patients with advanced lung disease. Although pulmonary function testing (PFT) is an important component of the lung allocation score (LAS), it is not always feasible on patients requiring ECMO. While generally safe, PFT testing has contraindications and is not recommended in unstable patients. Currently there are no recommendations regarding the performance of spirometry in ECMO patients. STUDY DESIGN: and Methods: We reviewed data on five patients with advanced lung disease requiring ECMO-bridge to transplant. After careful consideration of the theoretical physiologic risks associated with forced expiratory maneuvers, bedside spirometry was performed in order to update the patients' LAS. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed three forced expiratory maneuvers in the seated position with a bedside spirometer. Vital signs and ECMO flow were stable during testing and without complication. In 2 patients who had both a LAS pre and post spirometry, the LAS increased by 3-5 points. CONCLUSION: Spirometry results are pivotal to organ allocation under current organ sharing protocols. This case series demonstrates that bedside spirometry testing may be performed safely in patients on ECMO awaiting lung transplantation without appreciable side effects, leading to a more accurate LAS score.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a composite marker of acute lung allograft dysfunction in clinical care.

BACKGROUND: As a marker of underlying lung allograft injury, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to identify episodes of acute allograft injury in lung transplant recipients. We investigated the utility of dd-cfDNA to monitor subjects at risk of acute rejection or infection in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study collected data from lung transplant recipients within 3 years of transplant at 4 centers between March 24, 2020 and September 1, 2020. During this period, as part of routine care during the COVID-19 pandemic, these centers implemented a home-based surveillance program using plasma dd-cfDNA in preference to surveillance bronchoscopy. Dd-cfDNA was used to detect acute lung allograft dysfunction (ALAD) - a composite endpoint of acute rejection and infection. dd-cfDNA levels in patients with ALAD were compared to stable patients. The performance characteristics of dd-cfDNA ≥ 1.0% to detect ALAD were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients underwent 380 dd-cfDNA measurements, of which 290 were for routine surveillance purposes. dd-cfDNA was higher in patients with ALAD than stable patients (Median (IQR) 1.7% (0.63, 3.1) vs 0.35% (0.22, 0.79), p < 0.001). As an indication of underlying ALAD during surveillance testing, the estimated sensitivity of dd-cfDNA ≥1% was 73.9%, specificity of 87.7%, positive predictive value of 43.4% and negative predictive value of 96.5%. CONCLUSIONS: dd-cfDNA identified acute lung allograft dysfunction in asymptomatic lung transplant patients that may not have been identified by using a clinically indicated biopsy strategy alone. dd-cfDNA <1.0% may be useful in ruling out acute rejection and infection, supporting its use as a potential noninvasive marker for surveillance monitoring.

Donor derived cell free DNA% is elevated with pathogens that are risk factors for acute and chronic lung allograft injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute and chronic forms of lung allograft injury are associated with specific respiratory pathogens. Donor-derived cell free DNA (ddcfDNA) has been shown to be elevated with acute lung allograft injury and predictive of long-term outcomes. We examined the %ddcfDNA values at times of microbial isolation from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). METHODS: Two hundred and six BAL samples from 51 Lung Transplant Recipients (LTRs) with concurrently available plasma %ddcfDNA were analyzed along with microbiology and histopathology. Microbial species were grouped into bacterial, fungal, and viral and "higher risk" and "lower risk" cohorts based on historical association with downstream allograft dysfunction. Analyses were performed to determine pathogen category association with %ddcfDNA, independent of inter-subject variability. RESULTS: Presence of microbial isolates in BAL was not associated with elevated %ddcfDNA compared to samples without isolates. However, "higher risk" bacterial and viral microbes showed greater %ddcfDNA values than lower risk species (1.19% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.01), independent of inter-subject variability. Histopathologic abnormalities concurrent with pathogen isolation were associated with higher %ddcfDNA compared to isolation episodes with normal histopathology (medians 1.23% and 0.66%, p = 0.05). Assessments showed no evidence of correlation between histopathology or bronchoscopy indication and presence of higher risk vs. lower risk pathogens. CONCLUSION: %ddcfDNA is higher among cases of microbial isolation with concurrent abnormal histopathology and with isolation of higher risk pathogens known to increase risk of allograft dysfunction. Future studies should assess if %ddcfDNA can be used to stratify pathogens for risk of CLAD and identify pathogen associated injury prior to histopathology.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA accurately detects acute rejection in lung transplant patients, a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection, which includes antibody-mediated rejection and acute cellular rejection, is a risk factor for lung allograft loss. Lung transplant patients often undergo surveillance transbronchial biopsies to detect and treat acute rejection before irreversible chronic rejection develops. Limitations of this approach include its invasiveness and high interobserver variability. We tested the performance of percent donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA), a non-invasive blood test, to detect acute rejection. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study monitored 148 lung transplant subjects over a median of 19.6 months. We collected serial plasma samples contemporaneously with TBBx to measure %ddcfDNA. Clinical data was collected to adjudicate for acute rejection. The primary analysis consisted of computing the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve of %ddcfDNA to detect acute rejection. Secondary analysis determined %ddcfDNA rule-out thresholds for acute rejection. RESULTS: ddcfDNA levels were high after transplant surgery and decayed logarithmically. With acute rejection, ddcfDNA levels rose six-fold higher than controls. ddcfDNA levels also correlated with severity of lung function decline and histological grading of rejection. %ddcfDNA area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve for acute rejection, AMR, and ACR were 0.89, 0.93, and 0.83, respectively. ddcfDNA levels of <0.5% and <1.0% showed a negative predictive value of 96% and 90% for acute rejection, respectively. Histopathology detected one-third of episodes with ddcfDNA levels ≥1.0%, even though >90% of these events were coincident to clinical complications missed by histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that %ddcfDNA reliably detects acute rejection and other clinical complications potentially missed by histopathology, lending support to its use as a non-invasive marker of allograft injury.

Use of donor-derived-cell-free DNA as a marker of early allograft injury in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) to predict the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, the association between PGD and degree of allograft injury remains poorly defined. In this study, we leverage a novel biomarker for allograft injury, percentage donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA), to study the association between PGD, degree of allograft injury, and the development of CLAD. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited 99 lung transplant recipients and collected plasma samples on days 1, 3, and 7 for %ddcfDNA measurements. Clinical data on day 3 was used to adjudicate for PGD. %ddcfDNA levels were compared between PGD grades. In PGD patients, %ddcfDNA was compared between those who developed CLAD and those who did not. RESULTS: On posttransplant day 3, %ddcfDNA was higher in PGD than in non-PGD patients (median [IQR]: 12.2% [8.2, 22.0] vs 8.5% [5.6, 13.2] p = 0.01). %ddcfDNA correlated with the severity grade of PGD (r = 0.24, p = 0.02). Within the PGD group, higher levels of %ddcfDNA correlated with increased risk of developing CLAD (log OR(SE) 1.38 (0.53), p = 0.009). PGD patients who developed CLAD showed ∼2-times higher %ddcfDNA levels than patients who did not develop CLAD (median [IQR]: 22.4% [11.8, 27.6] vs 9.9% [6.7, 14.9], p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: PGD patients demonstrated increased early posttransplant allograft injury, as measured by %ddcfDNA, in comparison to non-PGD patients, and these high %ddcfDNA levels were associated with subsequent development of CLAD. This study suggests that %ddcfDNA identifies PGD patients at greater risk of CLAD than PGD alone.

Survival benefit of lung transplantation compared with medical management and pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with end-stage COPD.

BACKGROUND: COPD patients account for a large proportion of lung transplants; lung transplantation survival benefit for COPD patients is not well established. METHODS: We identified 4521 COPD patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) dataset transplanted from May 2005 to August 2016, and 604 patients assigned to receive pulmonary rehabilitation and medical management in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT). After trimming the populations for NETT eligibility criteria and data completeness, 1337 UNOS and 596 NETT patients remained. Kaplan-Meier estimates of transplant-free survival from transplantation for UNOS, and NETT randomisation, were compared between propensity score-matched UNOS (n=401) and NETT (n=262) patients. RESULTS: In propensity-matched analyses, transplanted patients had better survival compared to medically managed patients in NETT (p=0.003). Stratifying on 6 min walk distance (6 MWD) and FEV1, UNOS patients with 6 MWD <1000 ft (∼300 m) or FEV1 <20% of predicted had better survival than NETT counterparts (median survival 5.0 years UNOS versus 3.4 years NETT; log-rank p<0.0001), while UNOS patients with 6 MWD ≥1000 ft (∼300 m) and FEV1 ≥20% had similar survival to NETT counterparts (median survival, 5.4 years UNOS versus 4.9 years NETT; log-rank p=0.73), interaction p=0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival is better for matched lung transplant patients compared with medical management alone. Patients who derive maximum benefit are those with 6 MWD <1000 ft (∼300 m) or FEV1 <20% of predicted, compared with pulmonary rehabilitation and medical management.

Gait-speed and oxygen flow during six-minute walk test predicts mortality in patients with advanced lung disease.

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a useful tool to predict outcomes in patients with advanced lung diseases. Greater distance walked has been shown to have more favorable prognostic value compared to other recorded variables.  We reviewed the medical records of 164 patients with advanced lung disease who underwent lung transplant evaluation. Results of the 6MWT (distance walked, oxygen required, and mean gait speed) were recorded and analyzed with respect to mortality. 6MWT mean oxygen (O2) flow via nasal cannula was 3.5 ± 3.7 L/min. The distance walked in meters (m) and % predicted were inversely associated with mortality, OR: 0.995 (0.992-0.998) and 0.970 (0.950-0.990), respectively. Patients who walked < 200 meters (OR: 2.1 (1.1-4.0)) or < 45% of predicted, OR: 2.7 (1.2-5.7) had higher mortality. O2 flow during the test had a direct association with mortality (OR: 1.1 (1.0-1.2). In multivariate analysis, O2 flow > 3.5 L/min remained predictive of mortality, OR: 1.1 (1.0-1.2). Mean gait speed was higher in patient who lived compared with patients who died (mean 0.83 ± 0.35 m/mim vs mean 0.69 ± 0.33 m/min, respectively, p= 0.03). Gait speed was a predictor of survival, OR 3.4 (1.1, 10.6). O2 flow during the 6MWT was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with advanced lung disease. The patients that required more than 3.5 L/m of O2 had a higher mortality. Faster gait speed during the 6MWT was also associated with better survival.

Strategic application of modular risk components to safely increase lung transplantation volume.

OBJECTIVES: Considerable growth of individual lung transplant programs remains challenging. We hypothesized that the systematic implementation of modular risk components to a lung transplantation program would allow for expeditious growth without increasing mortality. METHODS: All consecutive patients placed on the lung transplantation waitlist were reviewed. Patients were stratified by an 18-month period surrounding the systematic implementation of the modular risk components Era 1 (1/2014-6/2015) and Era 2 (7/2015-12/2016). Modular risk components were separately evaluated for donors, recipients, and perioperative features. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two waitlist patients (Era 1: 48 and Era 2: 84) and 100 transplants (Era 1: 32 and Era 2: 68) were identified. There was a trend toward decreased waitlist mortality (P = .07). In Era 2, the use of ex vivo lung perfusion (P = .05) and donor-recipient over-sizing (P = .005) significantly increased. Moreover, transplantation with a lung allocation score greater than 70 (P = .05), extracorporeal support (P = .06), and desensitization (P = .008) were more common. Transplant rate significantly improved from Era 1 to Era 2 (325 vs 535 transplants per 100 patient years, P = .02). While primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours (P = .05) was significantly higher in Era 2, 1-year freedom from rejection was similar (86% vs 90%, P = .69) and survival (81% vs 95%, P = .02) was significantly greater in Era 2. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic implementation of a modular risk components to a lung transplantation program can result in a significant increase in center volume. However, measures to mitigate an expected increase in the incidence of PGD must be undertaken to maintain excellent short and midterm outcomes.

A randomised single-centre trial of inhaled liposomal cyclosporine for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome post-lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: No proven treatments exist for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) following lung transplantation. Inhaled liposomal cyclosporine (L-CsA) may prevent BOS progression. METHODS: A 48-week phase IIb randomised clinical trial was conducted in 21 lung transplant patients with BOS assigned to either L-CsA with standard-of-care (SOC) oral immunosuppression (L-CsA group) or SOC (SOC-alone group). Efficacy end-points were BOS progression-free survival (defined as absence of ≥20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from randomisation, re-transplantation or death) and BOS grade change. RESULTS: BOS progression-free survival was 82% for L-CsA versus 50% for SOC-alone (p=0.1) and BOS grade worsened in 18% for L-CsA versus 60% for SOC-alone (p=0.05). Mean changes in ΔFEV1 and forced vital capacity, respectively, stabilised with L-CsA: +0.005 (95% CI -0.004- +0.013) and -0.005 (95% CI -0.015- +0.006) L·month-1, but worsened with SOC-alone: -0.023 (95% CI -0.033- -0.013) and -0.026 (95% CI -0.039- -0.014) L·month-1 (p<0.0001 and p=0.009). Median survival (4.1 versus 2.9 years; p=0.03) and infection rate (45% versus 60%; p=0.7) improved with L-CsA versus SOC-alone; creatinine and tacrolimus levels were similar. CONCLUSIONS: L-CsA was well tolerated and stabilised lung function in lung transplant recipients affected by BOS without systemic toxicity, providing a basis for a global phase III trial using L-CsA.

Survival Associated With Sirolimus Plus Tacrolimus Maintenance Without Induction Therapy Compared With Standard Immunosuppression After Lung Transplant.

Importance: Median survival after lung transplant is less than 6 years. Standard maintenance therapy typically includes tacrolimus and an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine). Replacing the antimetabolite with sirolimus after postoperative wound healing may improve long-term survival due to antifibrotic, antiproliferative, and antiaging effects of sirolimus. Objectives: To compare survival between patients receiving sirolimus plus tacrolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (the most common maintenance therapy) and to identify the combination of induction and maintenance therapy associated with the highest survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of US recipients of lung transplants from January 1, 2003, through August 31, 2016, analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from January 1 through September 13, 2018. Because initiation of sirolimus therapy is usually delayed 3 to 12 months after lung transplant, primary analyses were based on patients alive and free of chronic rejection and malignant disease at 1 year in all groups, whereas sensitivity analyses used appropriate methods to include all patients from transplant time. Regression models adjusted for available potential confounders, including transplant center performance. Exposures: Cell cycle inhibitor maintenance therapies, including sirolimus (n = 219), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 5782), mycophenolate sodium (n = 408), azathioprine (n = 2556), and concurrent sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (n = 54), were compared within a tacrolimus-based regimen. Combinations of each induction (basiliximab, daclizumab, antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, or none) and maintenance (tacrolimus plus sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine) therapy were also compared. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival was the primary outcome; chronic rejection incidence and subsequent mortality were secondary outcomes. Results: Among this population of 9019 patients (median age, 57 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 46-63 years]; 5194 men [57.6%]), sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with better survival than mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (median, 8.9 years [IQR, 4.4-12.7 years] vs 7.1 years [IQR, 3.6-12.1 years]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; P = .003). Chronic rejection incidence (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92) and mortality after chronic rejection (aHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81) were lower with sirolimus plus tacrolimus. Compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus, survival differences for sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.79-1.65), mycophenolate sodium plus tacrolimus (aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17), and azathioprine plus tacrolimus (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02) were not significant. The induction-maintenance combination with the highest survival was sirolimus plus tacrolimus without induction therapy (median survival, 10.7 years [IQR, 7.3-12.7 years]; aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.76; P = .002) compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus with induction therapy (median survival, 7.4 years [IQR, 3.9-12.6 years]). Conclusions and Relevance: Sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with improved patient survival after lung transplant compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus; no antibody induction therapy with sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with maximal survival.

Prophylactic epinephrine for the prevention of transbronchial lung biopsy-related bleeding in lung transplant recipients (PROPHET) study: a protocol for a multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is frequently performed in single-lung and double-lung transplant recipients for evaluation of clinical and radiological findings as well as routine surveillance for acute cellular rejection. While rates of clinically significant TBLB-related haemorrhage are <1% for all comers, the incidence in lung transplant recipients is reported to be higher, presumably due to persistent allograft inflammation and alterations in allograft blood flow. While routinely performed by some bronchoscopists, the efficacy and safety profile of prophylactic administration of topical intrabronchial diluted epinephrine for the prevention of TBLB-related haemorrhage has not been explored in a prospective manner. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial (PROPHET Study), single-lung and double-lung transplant adult recipients from participating institutions who are scheduled for bronchoscopy with TBLB for clinical indications will be identified. Potential participants who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria and sign an informed consent will be randomised to receive either diluted epinephrine or placebo prior to performance of TBLB. The degree of TBLB-related haemorrhage will be graded by the performing bronchoscopist as well as independent observers. The primary analysis will compare the rates of severe and very severe bleeding in participants treated with epinephrine or placebo. The study will also evaluate the safety profile of prophylactic topical epinephrine including the occurrence of serious cardiovascular and haemodynamic adverse events. Additional secondary outcomes to be explored include rates of non-severe TBLB-related haemorrhage, overall yield of the bronchoscopic procedure and non-serious cardiovascular and haemodynamic adverse effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study procedures were reviewed and approved by institutional review boards in participating institutions. This study is being externally monitored, and a data and safety monitoring committee has been assembled to monitor patient safety and to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03126968; Pre-results.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA predicts allograft failure and mortality after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allograft failure is common in lung-transplant recipients and leads to poor outcomes including early death. No reliable clinical tools exist to identify patients at high risk for allograft failure. This study tested the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA) as a sensitive marker of early graft injury to predict impending allograft failure. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolled 106 subjects who underwent lung transplantation and monitored them after transplantation for the development of allograft failure (defined as severe chronic lung allograft dysfunction [CLAD], retransplantation, and/or death from respiratory failure). Plasma samples were collected serially in the first three months following transplantation and assayed for %ddcfDNA by shotgun sequencing. We computed the average levels of ddcfDNA over three months for each patient (avddDNA) and determined its relationship to allograft failure using Cox-regression analysis. FINDINGS: avddDNA was highly variable among subjects: median values were 3·6%, 1·6% and 0·7% for the upper, middle, and low tertiles, respectively (range 0·1%-9·9%). Compared to subjects in the low and middle tertiles, those with avddDNA in the upper tertile had a 6·6-fold higher risk of developing allograft failure (95% confidence interval 1·6-19·9, p = 0·007), lower peak FEV1 values, and more frequent %ddcfDNA elevations that were not clinically detectable. INTERPRETATION: Lung transplant patients with early unresolving allograft injury measured via %ddcfDNA are at risk of subsequent allograft injury, which is often clinically silent, and progresses to allograft failure. FUND: National Institutes of Health.