Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 36(5): 1072-82, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22745032

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess metabolite levels in peritumoral edematous (PO) and surrounding apparently normal (SAN) brain regions of glioblastoma, metastasis, and meningioma in humans with (1)H-MRSI to find biomarkers that can discriminate between tumors and characterize infiltrative tumor growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) spectra (semi-LASER MRSI, 30 msec echo time, 3T) were selected from regions of interest (ROIs) under MRI guidance, and after quality control of MR spectra. Statistical testing between patient groups was performed for mean metabolite ratios of an entire ROI and for the highest value within that ROI. RESULTS: The highest ratios of the level of choline compounds and the sum of myo-inositol and glycine over N-acetylaspartate and creatine compounds were significantly increased in PO regions of glioblastoma versus that of metastasis and meningioma. In the SAN region of glioblastoma some of these ratios were increased. Differences were less prominent for metabolite levels averaged over entire ROIs. CONCLUSION: Specific metabolite ratios in PO and SAN regions can be used to discriminate glioblastoma from metastasis and meningioma. An analysis of these ratios averaged over entire ROIs and those with most abnormal values indicates that infiltrative tumor growth in glioblastoma is inhomogeneous and extends into the SAN region.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/secundário , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Meningioma/diagnóstico , Meningioma/secundário , Biomarcadores/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prótons
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 32(1): 67-73, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21051512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Solitary MET and GBM are difficult to distinguish by using MR imaging. Differentiation is useful before any metastatic work-up or biopsy. Our hypothesis was that MET and GBM tumors differ in morphology. Shape analysis was proposed as an indicator for discriminating these 2 types of brain pathologies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this approach in the discrimination of GBMs and brain METs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dataset consisted of 33 brain MR imaging sets of untreated patients, of which 18 patients were diagnosed as having a GBM and 15 patients, as having solitary metastatic brain tumor. The MR imaging was segmented by using the K-means algorithm. The resulting set of classes (also called "clusters") represented the variety of tissues observed. A morphology-based approach allowed discrimination of the 2 types of tumors. This approach was validated by a leave-1-patient-out procedure. RESULTS: A method was developed for the discrimination of GBMs and solitary METs. Two masses out of 33 were wrongly classified; the overall results were accurate in 93.9% of the observed cases. CONCLUSIONS: A semiautomated method based on a morphologic analysis was developed. Its application was found to be useful in the discrimination of GBM from solitary MET.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Glioblastoma/patologia , Glioblastoma/secundário , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Reconhecimento Automatizado de Padrão/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Inteligência Artificial , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA