Nonmicrosurgical replantation using a subcutaneous pocket for salvage of the amputated fingertip.

PURPOSE: The pocket principle suggested by Brent in 1979 is an alternative method for use when microsurgical replantation is not feasible. The application and the amputation level for which the method is available, however, have not been well examined. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003 we treated 6 patients (7 fingers) by nonmicrosurgical replantation using a subcutaneous pocket (the Brent technique). All patients had sustained complete fingertip amputations across or proximal to the lunula in digits other than the thumb. In every case the amputation was a crush or avulsion-type injury and microsurgical replantation was not feasible; however, cosmetic symmetry was desired strongly by the patient. RESULTS: Of the 7 fingers only one survived completely but became atrophic after 4 months. One finger developed necrosis involving less than half of the replant but a hooked nail deformity developed. Two fingers developed partial necrosis involving more than half of the replant but both fingers were missing the fingernail and the cosmetic results were not acceptable. Three fingers developed total necrosis. In addition a slight flexion contracture not improved with therapy in the digits was noted in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Brent technique should be performed scrupulously for fingertip amputation across or proximal to the lunula because of the poor survival rate and the possibility of contracture in the digits or other proximal joints.

The PNB classification for treatment of fingertip injuries: the boundary between conservative treatment and surgical treatment.

The PNB classification, which was advocated by Evans and Bernadis, separates the injuries into their effects on 3 components of the fingertip: pulp, nail, and bone. Because each component is subdivided into 7 or 8 items, this can describe fingertip injuries more precisely. Between 1997 and 2003, we treated 381 fingertip injuries (279 males, 102 females; average age, 41.2 years) in our facilities. A 3-digit number was provided for each of the 381 cases in accordance with the PNB classification. We extracted patients in whom amputated tissues did not exist, and predicted the boundary between conservative treatment and surgical treatment by individually comparing the curative results of the same type of injuries. In conclusion, PNB 355-366 and PNB 455-466 were most suitable for surgical treatment, and the boundaries between surgical treatment and conservative treatment were PNB 386 and 666 and 700. The results, which are the criteria for surgical treatment, are summarized as follows; 1) More than two thirds of the distal phalanx remains. 2)The nail bed defect ranges from one third to half. If the defect is more or less than the criteria, the surgical treatment is less significant. Recognition of the boundary and prevention from unnecessary surgical treatment leads to minimum invasive surgery for fingertip injuries.