RESUMO
Introduction Accurate, comprehensive, and legible operation notes are essential for maintaining patient records, supporting healthcare professionals, and facilitating research. The study focused on adherence to Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidelines established in 2008. Despite the guidelines, poor documentation practices have been reported globally. This audit seeks to address this issue and enhance documentation quality. Methodology The audit evaluated 19 parameters as defined in the 2014 RCS operative note guidelines. Data collection occurred during the initial cycle, spanning from March to April 2023, encompassing all surgical procedures at Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC). Subsequently, a re-audit took place in July 2023 to gauge enhancements following a survey and educational intervention that took place in June 2023. The process included the formation of an audit team, securing ethical approval, and implementing a comprehensive methodology for data collection and analysis. The study spanned two data collection cycles to comprehensively assess improvements. Results Comparing initial and re-audit cycles (n = 390 and n = 108, respectively), improvements were observed in several documentation aspects. Parameters such as surgery date, elective/emergency classification, and names of key personnel showed significant enhancement. Notable improvements were also seen in the recording of operative details, complications, extra procedures, and post-operative care instructions. In our department, an educational survey was conducted to gain insights into compliance rates. This survey underscored the significance of adhering to RCS guidelines, identified the factors influencing adherence, and proposed strategies for improvement. Conclusion The audit affirmed the significance of adhering to RCS guidelines for operation note documentation. The study demonstrated improvements in documentation practices, emphasising the importance of accurate records for patient care, research, and ethical standards. The findings validate RCS guidelines as a tool for the identification of defects in documentation and thus as a guide that highlights where improvements are necessary. Addressing challenges identified in this audit can drive the department towards becoming a model for RCS guideline adherence and showcasing high-quality surgical documentation and patient-centred care.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare tumors, comprising about 1 % of pancreatic tumors. They primarily affect females during their reproductive phase and have a favorable prognosis. SPNs are usually asymptomatic or present with mild symptoms. The exact histopathogenesis of SPNs remains unknown. Surgical resection is curative, and central pancreatectomy is a pancreas-sparing surgical technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old female presented with epigastric pain, vomiting, and infertility. Imaging revealed a mass in the pancreas. Exploration confirmed the mass, and central pancreatectomy was performed. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of SPN. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and follow-up CT scans showed no recurrence. DISCUSSION: This case involves a 33-year-old female presenting with epigastric pain and vomiting, revealing a cystic mass with a solid component in the pancreas. While generally benign, SPNs can become malignant in 15 % cases, with a favorable prognosis. Histopathologically, SPNs remain distinct, with CD99 and CD10 staining confirming the diagnosis. Diagnostic imaging, particularly CT scans, aids in identifying SPNs. Surgical resection, such as central pancreatectomy, is effective, preserving organ function. The case's positive outcome aligns with an overall 5-year survival rate of 95-97 %, highlighting the overall favorable prognosis of SPNs. The procedure's balance between tumor removal and organ preservation offers clinical advantages. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the successful management of an SPN using central pancreatectomy. It highlights the importance of early diagnosis and surgical intervention, as well as the favorable prognosis associated with SPNs, even in cases of metastasis. Central pancreatectomy offers organ preservation and reduces long-term complications. Continued reporting and research on such cases contribute to refining treatment strategies for SPNs.