The posterior tibial slope does not influence the flexion angle in posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain whether an increase in the tibial slope leads to better flexion in posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prostheses. PURPOSE: To compare the intra-operative flexion angle between standard and an additional 10° posterior slope inserts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2014 and February 2015, 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent PS mobile-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included. Flexion angles were measured using either standard or specially-made inserts. Differences in flexion angles between the two situations were analyzed to determine the relationship between changes in flexion angle and pre-operative flexion angle or body mass index (BMI), and between intra- and post-operative flexion angle. RESULTS: The difference between the average flexion angle of standard inserts and specially-made inserts was not statistically significant. Although the correlations between changes in flexion angle due to insert difference and flexion angle, pre-operative flexion angle or BMI were not significant, there was a positive correlation between intra-operative and post-operative flexion at 2 years. CONCLUSION: The results showed an additional posterior tibial slope by 10° did not affect the intra-operative flexion angle. Surgeons performing PS mobile-bearing TKA do not need to excessively slope the tibial bone cutting to improve the post-operative flexion angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Experimental study.

Joint Gap in Mid-Flexion Is Not a Predictor of Postoperative Flexion Angle After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative knee flexion angle is one of the most important outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intraoperative ligament balancing may affect the postoperative range of motion of the knee. However, the relationship between intraoperative ligament balancing and postoperative flexion angle was still controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative joint gap affects postoperative knee flexion angle or not. METHODS: Prospective multicenter study of 246 knees with varus osteoarthritis undergoing a posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing TKA was performed. The joint gap before implantation and after implantation was measured. The joint gap after implantation was measured using a specially designed tensor device with the same shape of a total knee prosthesis at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion with the reduction of the patellofemoral joint. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of the flexion angle of the knee after the operation. RESULTS: Predictors were identified in the following 3 categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative flexion angle, and (3) joint gap looseness at 120° of flexion (joint gap after implantation at 120° of flexion - joint gap after implantation at 0° of flexion) (R = 0.472, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Flexion angle after TKA was not affected by the flexion joint gap looseness before implantation and the joint gap looseness after implantation from 30° to 90° of flexion. Surgeons should notice that joint gap looseness in mid-flexion range did not increase the postoperative knee flexion angle.

Decreased extension gap and valgus alignment after implantation of total knee prosthesis in primary varus knees.

PURPOSE: It was hypothesised that implantation of a total knee prosthesis may change the size and shape of the joint gap. To test this hypothesis, a tensor device was used which was specifically designed to reproduce the conditions before and after implantation, including attachment of the polyethylene insert trial. This study aimed to compare the joint gaps before and after implantation of a total knee prosthesis using this new tensor device. METHODS: A total of 259 primary varus knees were included in this study. Knees were exposed using a medial parapatellar approach, and the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments were resected. After the trial reduction, the intraoperative joint gap kinematics was measured using the tensor device. RESULTS: Implantation of a total knee prosthesis decreased the size of the extension joint gap and made it valgus, but did not influence the size or shape of the flexion joint gap. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that the classical gap technique, which creates equal and rectangular extension and flexion joint gaps in the bone cutting surface, results in an imbalance between the extension and flexion joint gaps after implantation. To achieve equal and rectangular extension and flexion joint gaps after implantation, the prepared extension joint gap should be about 2 mm larger than the flexion joint gap and slightly varus before implantation in primary varus knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Midflexion Laxity After Implantation Was Influenced by the Joint Gap Balance Before Implantation in TKA.

The relationship between the joint gap before and after implantation in 259 knees during the total knee arthroplasty was investigated using a tensor device which can attach the polyethylene insert trial. Patients were divided into following 3 groups according to the joint gap balance before implantation (flexion joint gap--extension joint gap); group 1: >1mm; group 2: -1 to 1mm, and group 3: <-1mm. Joint gap after implantation was loose at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion in group 1 and 2, but loose only at 30° of flexion in group 3 (p<0.01). This study showed that loose flexion joint gap before implantation increased the risk of joint gap laxity after implantation especially at midflexion ranges.

Intraoperative assessment of midflexion laxity in total knee prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue balancing of the knee is fundamental to the success of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In posterior-stabilized TKA, there is no stabilizer of the anterior-posterior translation in the midflexion range in which the cam-post mechanism does not engage yet. Therefore, instability in the midflexion range is suspected to occur in posterior-stabilized TKA. The purpose of this study was to measure the joint gap throughout a full range of motion and to analyze the joint gap laxity in the midflexion range after implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis. METHODS: Joint gap kinematics in 259 knees with varus osteoarthritis were measured during TKAs using a tensor device with the same shape of a total knee prosthesis of the same design was used. After the implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis and the reduction of the patellofemoral joint, the joint gap was measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion. RESULTS: The center size of the joint gap was tight in extension and deep flexion and loose at midflexion ranges, especially at 30° of flexion (p<0.001). The symmetry of the joint gap was varus at 0° and 145° of flexion (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the joint gap laxity in the midflexion range after the implantation of a mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Our new tensor device, which can attach the polyethylene insert trial, will provide the important information about the joint gap kinematics after implantation of total knee prostheses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.