Statins use and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the direct oral anticoagulant era: insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.

Statins were reported to have a potential effect of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), although that of secondary prevention remains uncertain. To investigate the association between statins use and recurrent VTE in the current era. The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. We divided the entire cohort into 2 groups according to statins use at the time of discharge; the statins (N = 865) and no statins groups (N = 4332). The statins group was older (72.9 vs. 66.7 years, P < 0.001), and less often had active cancer (22.0% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation was significantly lower in the statins group (60.3% vs. 52.6%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in the statins group (6.8% vs. 10.1%, Log-rank P = 0.01). Even after adjusting for the confounders, the lower risk of the statins group relative to the no statins group remained significant for recurrent VTE (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.91, P = 0.01). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the statins group (12.2% vs. 14.1%, Log-rank P = 0.04), although, after adjusting for the confounders, the risk of the statins group relative to the no statins group turned to be insignificant (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-1.00, P = 0.054). In this large real-world VTE registry, statins use was significantly associated with a lower risk for the recurrent VTE in the current era.

Subclass phenotypes in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolisms using a latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) can be sub-classified based on the different phenotypes using a latent class analysis (LCA), which might be useful for selecting individual management strategies. METHODS: In the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 database enrolling 5197 VTE patients, the current derivation cohort consisted of 1556 patients with unprovoked VTEs. We conducted clustering with an LCA, and the patients were classified into subgroups with the highest probability. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes among the developed subgroups. RESULTS: This LCA model proposed 3 subgroups based on 8 clinically relevant variables, and classified 592, 813, and 151 patients as Class I, II, and III, respectively. Based on the clinical features, we named Class I the younger, Class II the older with a few comorbidities, and Class III the older with many comorbidities. The cumulative 3-year anticoagulation discontinuation rate was highest in the older with many comorbidities (Class III) (39.9 %, 36.1 %, and 48.4 %, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTEs among the 3 classes (12.8 %, 11.1 %, and 4.0 % P = 0.20), whereas the cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was significantly higher in the older with many comorbidities (Class III) (7.8 %, 12.7 %, and 17.8 %, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The current LCA revealed that patients with unprovoked VTEs could be sub-classified into further phenotypes depending on the patient characteristics. Each subclass phenotype could have different clinical outcomes risks especially a bleeding risk, which could have a potential benefit when considering the individual anticoagulation strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm COMMAND VTE Registry-2: Unique identifier, UMIN000044816 COMMAND VTE Registry: Unique identifier, UMIN000021132.

Edoxaban for 12 Versus 3 Months in Cancer-associated Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis According to Different Doses: Insights from the ONCO DVT study.

BACKGROUND: The ONCO DVT study revealed the superiority of 12-month relative to 3-month edoxaban treatment for cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) regarding the thrombotic risk. METHODS: In this pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study, we stratified the patients into those with a standard edoxaban dose (60 mg/day; N=151) and those with a reduced edoxaban dose (30 mg/day; N=450) and evaluated the clinical outcomes for the 12-month and 3-month treatments. RESULTS: The cumulative 12-month incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower in the 12-month than 3-month group for both the 60 mg (1.3% vs. 11.6%, P=0.02; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.97) and 30 mg (1.1% vs. 7.6%, P=0.002; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60) edoxaban subgroups, which was consistent across the edoxaban doses without a significant interaction (P =0.90). The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the 12-month group than 3-month group for the 60 mg edoxaban subgroup (14.3% vs. 4.4%, P=0.046; OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 0.97-13.52), whereas it did not significantly differ between the two groups for the 30 mg edoxaban subgroup (8.7% vs. 8.6%, P=0.89; OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91), signaling there was a potential interaction (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regimen for cancer-associated isolated distal DVT was consistently superior to a 3-month regimen, across the edoxaban doses for the thrombotic risk. However, caution was suggested for the standard dose of edoxaban due to the potential for an increased risk of bleeding with prolonged anticoagulation therapy.

Prophylactic Anticoagulation and Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients with Clinically Stable COVID-19 at Admission: From the Practice-Based Observational Study.

Objectives: The potential benefit of routine prophylactic anticoagulation for all hospitalized patients with clinically stable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still controversial. Method: The CLOT-COVID Study was a multicenter observational study enrolling 2894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The current study population consisted of 1738 hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 at admission not requiring oxygen administration, who were divided into 2 groups: patients with prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 326) and those without (n = 1412). Results: Patients with prophylactic anticoagulation had more severe status of the worst severity of COVID-19 during hospitalization compared with those without (mild: 38% versus 82%, moderate: 55% versus 17%, and severe or death at discharge: 6.4% versus 0.7%, P <0.001). During hospitalization, 8 patients (0.5%) developed thrombosis, and the incidences of thrombosis were numerically higher in patients with more severe status of worst severity of COVID-19 during hospitalization (mild: 0.2%, moderate: 1.2%, and severe or death at discharge: 3.2%). Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients with clinically stable COVID-19 at admission, patients who did not worsen in COVID-19 severity after admission rarely developed thrombosis, although patients with worsening of COVID-19 severity after admission more often received prophylactic anticoagulation and might have a higher risk of thrombosis.

Direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, DOAC-associated bleeding complications remain challenging, especially in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. This study aimed to compare the bleeding outcomes between patients with upper or lower GI cancers and those without GI cancer. METHODS: Using the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 database, which is a multicenter registry enrolling 5197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020, we identified 1149 active cancer patients with DOACs (upper GI cancer: N = 88; lower GI cancer: N = 114; non-GI cancer: N = 947). The primary outcome was major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy, which was evaluated in the competing risk regression model. RESULTS: The upper GI cancer group had a lower mean body weight, and most often had anemia. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was higher in the upper GI cancer group (upper GI cancer: 22.4 %, lower GI cancer: 15.4 %, and non-GI cancer: 11.6 %, P = 0.015). The most frequent major bleeding site in the upper GI cancer group was the upper GI (53 %), followed by the lower GI (24 %). After adjusting for the confounders, the excess risk in upper GI cancer relative to non-GI cancer remained significant for major bleeding (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.25; 95 %CI, 1.31-3.87, P = 0.003), but that in lower GI cancer was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Upper GI cancer, but not lower GI cancer, as compared to non-GI cancer was associated with a higher risk for major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm Unique identifier: UMIN000044816.

Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban or Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in the Real World: Insights from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on clinical characteristics and outcomes related to the use of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is lacking. METHODS: The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5,197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE from 31 centers in Japan from January 2015-August 2020. Our study population comprised 1,197 patients with active cancer who were divided into the edoxaban (N=643, 54%), rivaroxaban (N=297, 25%), and apixaban (N=257, 22%) groups. RESULTS: The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE (9.3%, 10.2%, and 8.5%, respectively, P=0.82) and all-cause death (67.5%, 66.8%, and 63.8%, respectively, P=0.22) did not differ among the groups. Despite adjusting for confounders, the risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the groups. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than those in the other groups (22.6%, 14.0%, and 22.8%, P=0.04; and 37.6%, 26.8%, and 38.3%, P=0.01, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, in the rivaroxaban group, the risk for major bleeding was numerically lower (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.40-1.01) and that of clinically relevant all bleeding was significantly lower (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.92) than those in the edoxaban group. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of recurrent VTE and all-cause death did not differ significantly among the different DOACs ; however, the risk of bleeding events could differ, with a potentially lower risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban.

Fragility and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism receiving direct oral anticoagulants: From the COMMAND VTE REGISTRY-2.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited data on the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in fragile patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 enrolling patients with acute symptomatic VTE. The study population consisted of 3928 patients receiving DOACs, who were divided into fragile (2136 patients) and non-fragile groups (1792 patients). Fragility was defined as patients of age ≥ 75 years, creatinine clearance level ≤ 50 ml/min, and/or body weight ≤ 50 kg. RESULTS: The fragile group significantly more often received reduced doses of DOACs compared to the non-fragile group (51 % and 19 %, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was numerically higher in the fragile group than the non-fragile group (15.0 % and 11.1 %, P = 0.052), even with no significant excess risk after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.81-1.31, P = 0.78). The cumulative 5-year incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was significantly higher in the fragile group than the non-fragile group (28.6 % and 19.6 %, P < 0.001), even after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.08-1.53, P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE between the groups (9.6 % and 8.9 %, P = 0.68), which was consistent after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.13, 95%CI 0.84-1.51, P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Among VTE patients receiving DOACs, fragile patients were associated with a numerically higher rate of major bleeding and a significantly increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding, but not an increased risk of recurrent VTE.

The impact of renal function on clinical outcomes of patients with cancer-associated isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: Insights from the ONCO DVT study.

BACKGROUND: The multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial ONCO DVT compared 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and suggested potential benefits of prolonged edoxaban treatment in terms of thrombotic risk. However, the risk-benefit balance of prolonged edoxaban treatment in patients with renal function remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of 3-month and 12-month edoxaban treatment regimens in patients with cancer-associated isolated distal DVT and different renal functions. METHODS: This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the ONCO DVT study included 601 patients divided into subgroups according to renal function using a 50 mL/min creatinine clearance (Ccr) cutoff. The primary endpoint was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death at 12 months and the major secondary endpoint was major bleeding at 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 601 patients, 131 (21.8 %) comprised the renal dysfunction subgroup. The primary endpoint occurred in 6 (9.7 %) and 1 (1.4 %) patients in the 3-month and 12-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively, and in 16 (6.6 %) and 2 (0.9 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. The major secondary endpoint occurred in 9 (14.5 %) and 7 (10.1 %) patients in the 12-month and 3-month edoxaban groups in the renal dysfunction subgroup, and in 13 (5.3 %) and 21 (9.3 %) patients in the no renal dysfunction subgroup, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A 12-month edoxaban regiment was superior to a 3-month treatment in terms of thrombotic risk irrespective of renal function. A higher bleeding risk was not identified in patients with renal dysfunction who received prolonged edoxaban treatment.

Transition of management strategies and long-term outcomes in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism from the warfarin era to the direct oral anticoagulant era.

BACKGROUND: There have been still limited data on the transition of management strategies and clinical outcomes after introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the real-world clinical practice. METHODS: Using the 2 series of multicenter COMMAND VTE registries in Japan enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE, we compared 695 patients with cancer-associated VTE in the Registry-1 of the warfarin era and 1507 patients in the Registry-2 of the DOAC era. RESULTS: Regarding oral anticoagulation therapy, 576 patients (82.9 %) in the Registry-1 received warfarin, whereas 1119 patients (79.6 %) in the Registry-2 received DOACs. The cumulative 3-year incidence of discontinuation of anticoagulation was not significantly different between the 2 registries (56.7 % vs. 62.7 %, P = 0.11). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was significantly lower in the Registry-2 than in the Registry-1 (17.7 % vs. 10.1 %, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the Registry-2 than in the Registry-1 (26.6 % vs. 20.4 %, P = 0.045). The proportion of gastrointestinal bleeding numerically increased from the Registry-1 to the Registry-2 (46.7 % and 49.5 %), whereas that of intracranial bleeding numerically decreased from the Registry-1 to the Registry-2 (17.1 % and 14.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: In the current historical comparison of cancer-associated VTE between the 2 large real-world registries, there was a striking change in the treatment strategies with decreased risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in the DOAC era compared with those in the warfarin era, while there seemed to be unmet needs of DOAC-related gastrointestinal bleeding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: UMIN000044816.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the direct oral anticoagulants era: Insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on real-world management strategies and clinical outcomes of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) era. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the status of cancer-associated VTE in the DOAC era. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study among 31 centers in Japan between 2015 and 2020 enrolled 5197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE, who were divided into 1507 patients (29 %) with active cancer and 3690 patients (71 %) without. RESULTS: The cumulative 3-year rate of anticoagulation discontinuation was significantly higher in patients with active cancer than in those without (62.7 % vs. 59.1 %, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was higher in patients with active cancer than in those without (10.1 % vs. 9.1 %, P = 0.01), however, after adjusting for the confounders and competing risk of mortality, the excess risk of the active cancer group relative to the no active cancer group was no longer significant (HR: 0.95, 95 % CI: 0.73-1.24). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was much higher in the active cancer group (20.4 % vs. 11.6 %, P < 0.001). Even after adjusting for the confounders and competing risk of mortality, the risk of the active cancer group relative to the no active cancer group remained significant (HR: 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.66). CONCLUSIONS: The current large real-world registry revealed that the risk of major bleeding was still higher in patients with active cancer than in those without, leading to the frequent anticoagulation discontinuation, which has been still a huge challenge to overcome in the DOAC era.

Anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: There has been limited data on anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the era of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). METHODS: The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolling 5197 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE between January 2015 and August 2020 among 31 centers in Japan. In this primary report, the entire cohort was divided into 5 groups; major transient risk factors (N = 475, 9.1%), minor transient risk factors (N = 788, 15%), unprovoked (N = 1913, 37%), non-malignant persistent risk factors (N = 514, 9.9%), and active cancer (N = 1507, 29%) groups. RESULTS: DOACs were administered in 79% of patients who received oral anticoagulants. Discontinuation of anticoagulant at 1 year was most frequent in the major transient risk factors group (57.2%, 46.3%, 29.1%, 32.0%, and 45.6%). The cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was lowest in the major transient risk factors group (2.6%, 6.4%, 11.0%, 12.1%, and 10.1%, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was highest in the active cancer group (9.8%, 11.4%, 11.0%, 15.5%, and 20.4%, P < 0.001). After discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy, the cumulative 5-year incidence of recurrent VTE was highest in the unprovoked group (3.3%, 11.0%, 24.9%, 17.5%, and 11.8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world VTE registry, anticoagulation strategies and long-term recurrence widely differed depending on the baseline characteristics. Detailed risk stratifications of recurrent VTE could be useful for decision-making of anticoagulation strategies, whereas the bleeding-risk assessment might be especially important in the era of DOAC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm Unique identifier: UMIN000044816.

Edoxaban for 12 Months Versus 3 Months in Patients With Cancer With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis (ONCO DVT Study): An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point. RESULTS: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75-2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

Clinical Features Comparing Arterial Thrombosis and Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Result from the CLOT-COVID Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of arterial thrombosis and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: The CLOT-COVID Study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study that enrolled 2,894 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 among 16 centers in Japan from April 2021 to September 2021. We compared the clinical features of arterial thrombosis and VTE. Results: Thrombosis was observed in 55 patients (1.9%) during hospitalization. Arterial thrombosis and VTE occurred in 12 (0.4%) and 36 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Among the 12 patients with arterial thrombosis, 9 (75%), 2 (17%), and 1 developed ischemic cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, and acute limb ischemia, respectively, and there were five patients (42%) without comorbidities. Among 36 patients with VTE, 19 (53%) and 17 (47%) developed pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), respectively. PE was common in the early stages of hospitalization; whereas, DVT was common beyond the early stages of hospitalization. Conclusion: Among patients with COVID-19, arterial thrombosis was less common than VTE, although ischemic cerebral infarction seemed to be relatively common, and a certain number of patients developed arterial thrombosis even in the absence of known atherosclerosis risk factors.

Risk Factors and Impact on Outcomes of Thrombosis in Patients with COVID-19 in Japan: From the CLOT-COVID Study.

Objectives: The relationship between the thrombotic event and prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not yet been fully investigated in Japan. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and risk factors for thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Japan. Materials and Methods: We compared the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes among patients with thrombosis (N=55) and those without thrombosis (N=2839) by using a large-scale data of CLOT-COVID study (thrombosis and antiCoaguLatiOn Therapy in patients with COVID-19 in Japan Study: UMIN000045800). Thrombosis included venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and systemic arterial thromboembolism. Results: Higher rates of mortality and bleeding events were shown in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with thrombosis compared to those without thrombosis (all-cause mortality, 23.6% vs. 5.1%, P<0.001; major bleeding, 23.6% vs. 1.6%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of thrombosis were male sex, D-dimer level on admission>1.0 µg/mL, and moderate and severe COVID-19 status on admission. Conclusions: The development of thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was related to higher mortality and major bleeding, and several independent risk factors for thrombosis could help determine the patient-appropriate treatment for COVID-19.

Long-term outcome of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension using direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin: a Japanese prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) requires lifelong anticoagulation. Long-term outcomes of CTEPH under current anticoagulants are unclear. OBJECTIVES: The CTEPH AC registry is a prospective, nationwide cohort study comparing the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for CTEPH. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients with CTEPH, both tre atment-naïve and on treatment, were eligible for the registry. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥20 years and those who were diagnosed with CTEPH according to standard guidelines. Exclusion criteria were not specified. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite morbidity, and mortality outcome comprised all-cause death, rescue reperfusion therapy, initiation of parenteral pulmonary vasodilators, and worsened 6-minute walk distance and WHO functional class. The safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, including major bleeding. RESULTS: Nine hundred twenty-seven patients on oral anticoagulants at baseline were analyzed: 481 (52%) used DOACs and 446 (48%) used warfarin. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates of composite morbidity and mortality outcome were comparable between the DOAC and warfarin groups (2.6%, 3.1%, and 4.2% vs 3.0%, 4.8%, and 5.9%, respectively; P = .52). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates of clinically relevant bleeding were significantly lower in DOACs than in the warfarin group (0.8%, 2.4%, and 2.4% vs 2.5%, 4.8%, and 6.4%, respectively; P = 0.036). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models revealed lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding in the DOAC group than the warfarin group (hazard ratio: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.91; P = .032). CONCLUSION: This registry demonstrated that under current standard of care, morbidity and mortality events were effectively prevented regardless of anticoagulants, while the clinically relevant bleeding rate was lower when using DOACs compared with warfarin.

Mortality-associated Risk Factors in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Japan: Findings of the CLOT-COVID Study.

BACKGROUND: Reports of mortality-associated risk factors in patients with the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical features that were associated with mortality among patients who died during hospitalization (n = 158) and those who were alive at discharge (n = 2,736) from the large-scale, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort CLOT-COVID study, which enrolled consecutively hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 16 centers in Japan from April to September 2021. Data from 2,894 hospitalized COVID-19 participants of the CLOT-COVID study were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Patients who died were older (71.1 years vs 51.6 years, P < 0.001), had higher median D-dimer values on admission (1.7 µg/mL vs 0.8 µg/mL, P < 0.001), and had more comorbidities. On admission, the patients who died had more severe COVID-19 than did those who survived (mild: 16% vs 63%, moderate: 47% vs 31%, and severe: 37% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001). In patients who died, the incidence of thrombosis and major bleeding during hospitalization was significantly higher than that in those who survived (thrombosis: 8.2% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001; major bleeding: 12.7% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that age >70 years, high D-dimer values on admission, heart disease, active cancer, higher COVID-19 severity on admission, and development of major bleeding during hospitalization were independently associated with a higher mortality risk. CONCLUSION: This large-scale observational study in Japan identified several independent risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 that could facilitate appropriate risk stratification of patients with COVID-19.

Significant Impact of Age on Mortality and Non-significant Impact of Age on Thrombosis and Major Bleeding in Patients with COVID-19: From the CLOT-COVID Study.

AIM: There is scarce data on the impact of age on clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHOD: The CLOT-COVID Study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling 2894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 among 16 centers in Japan from April 2021 to September 2021. We divided the entire cohort into five groups according to age strata; -19, 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, and 80- years. RESULTS: Most patients under 19 had mild COVID-19 on admission (99%), while older patients had more severe COVID-19. The incidence rates of clinical outcomes during hospitalization in patients aged ≤ 19, 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, and 80 ≥ years were 0.0%, 0.5%, 2.2%, 2.7%, and 1.5% for thrombosis; 0.0%, 1.2%, 1.5%, 3.4%, and 2.0% for major bleeding; and 0.0%, 0.4%, 2.0%, 12.1%, and 16.8% for all-cause death, respectively. In the stratified analysis according to COVID-19 severity on admission, the incidences of thrombosis were generally higher among patients with more severe status, although those were not significantly different among age strata in all sub-types of COVID-19 severity. However, the incidences of all-cause death were significantly higher with increasing age in all sub-types of COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: In the current large observational study of patients with COVID-19, the risk of mortality became markedly higher with increased age. However, the risks of thrombosis and major bleeding did not necessarily increase as age increases, which seemed to be consistent irrespective of COVID-19 severity on admission.

Association Between the Development of Thrombosis and Worsening of Disease Severity in Patients With Moderate COVID-19 on Admission　- From the CLOT-COVID Study.

BACKGROUND: The worsening of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity is a critical issue in current clinical settings and may be associated with the development of thrombosis.Methods and Results: This study used patient data obtained in the CLOT-COVID study, a retrospective multicenter cohort study. The demographics of patients with moderate COVID-19 on admission with and without worsened severity during hospitalization were compared and predictors were identified. Of 927 patients with moderate COVID-19 on admission, 182 (19.6%) had worsened severity during hospitalization. Patients with worsening of severity were older, more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and active cancer, and more likely to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Patients with worsening of severity had higher D-dimer levels on admission and were more likely to develop thrombosis and major bleeding during hospitalization than those without worsening. Increased age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03, P=0.005), diabetes (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.11-2.33, P=0.012), D-dimer levels >1.0 µg/mL on admission (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.45-3.03, P<0.001), and thrombosis (OR: 6.28, 95% CI: 2.72-14.53, P<0.001) were independently associated with worsening of COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of patients with moderate COVID-19 had worsened severity during hospitalization. Increased age, diabetes, D-dimer levels >1.0 µg/mL on admission, and the development of thrombosis during hospitalization were significantly associated with worsened COVID-19 severity.

Influence of obesity on incidence of thrombosis and disease severity in patients with COVID-19: From the CLOT-COVID study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of obesity on the development of thrombosis and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. METHOD: The CLOT-COVID study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study enrolling 2894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between April 2021 and September 2021 among 16 centers in Japan. The present study consisted of 2690 patients aged over 18 years with available body mass index (BMI), who were divided into an obesity group (BMI ≥30) (N = 457) and a non-obesity group (BMI <30) (N = 2233). RESULTS: The obesity group showed more severe status of COVID-19 at admission compared with the non-obesity group. The incidence of thrombosis was not significantly different between the groups (obesity group: 2.6 % versus non-obesity group: 1.9 %, p = 0.39), while the incidence of a composite outcome of all-cause death, or requirement of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during hospitalization was significantly higher in the obesity group (20.1 % versus 15.0 %, p < 0.01). After adjusting confounders in the multivariable logistic regression model, the risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for thrombosis was not significant (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95 % CI, 0.68-2.84, p = 0.37), while the adjusted risk of obesity relative to non-obesity for the composite outcome was significant (adjusted OR, 1.85; 95 % CI, 1.39-2.47, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present large-scale observational study, obesity was not significantly associated with the development of thrombosis during hospitalization; however, it was associated with severity of COVID-19.