Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Manage ; 343: 118211, 2023 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37253313

RESUMO

An integrated lab-scale wastewater treatment system consisting of an anaerobic Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (AnMBBR) and an aerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AeMBR) in series was used to study the removal and fate of pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment. Continuous-flow experiments were conducted applying different temperatures to the AnMBBR (Phase A: 35 °C; Phase B: 20 °C), while batch experiments were performed for calculating sorption and biotransformation kinetics. The total removal of major pollutants and target pharmaceuticals was not affected by the temperature of the AnMBBR. In Phase A, the average removal of dissolved chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), and ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) was 86%, 91% and 96% while in Phase B, 91%, 96% and 96%, respectively. Removal efficiencies ranging between 65% and 100% were observed for metronidazole (MTZ), trimethoprim (TMP), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), and valsartan (VAL), while slight (<30%) or no removal was observed for carbamazepine (CBZ) and diclofenac (DCF), respectively. Application of a mass balance model showed that the predominant mechanism for the removal of pharmaceuticals was biotransformation, while the role of sorption was of minor importance. The AeMBR was critical for VAL, SMX and TMP biodegradation; the elimination of MTZ was strongly enhanced by the AnMBBR. In both bioreactors, Bacteroidetes was the dominant phylum in both bioreactors over time. In the AnMBBR, Cloacibacterium and Bacteroides had a higher abundance in the biocarriers compared to the suspended biomass.


Assuntos
Poluentes Químicos da Água , Purificação da Água , Biofilmes , Anaerobiose , Reatores Biológicos/microbiologia , Sulfametoxazol , Trimetoprima , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos , Esgotos
2.
Bioresour Technol ; 323: 124629, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421834

RESUMO

Two systems were compared for medium-strength dairy wastewater treatment. The first comprised a methanogenic Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (AnMBBR) and an aerobic MBBR (AeMBBR), while the second an AnMBBR and a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with Chlorella sorokiniana. The AnMBBR, under ambient conditions, achieves biogas production sufficient enough to attain energy autonomy. The produced energy was 0.538 kWh m-3, whereas the energy consumption 0.025 kWh m-3. Its coupling with the AeMBBR removed COD, NH4-N TKN, and PO4-P by 93 ± 4%, 97 ± 3%, 99 ± 1% and 49 ± 15%, respectively, while the use of the SBR as a second step eliminated totally COD but partially the other pollutants. The higher nitrogen removal in the first system was due to nitrification occurring in the AeMBBR. The acclimatization of microalgae to dairy wastewater enhanced their growth. Their protein content was 54.56%, while starch and lipids were 3.39% and 23.1%, respectively.


Assuntos
Chlorella , Microalgas , Purificação da Água , Biofilmes , Reatores Biológicos , Nitrogênio/análise , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos , Águas Residuárias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...