[Ethische Orientierung durch interkulturelle Kompetenz in interkulturellen Behandlungssituationen]. / Ethische Orientierung durch interkulturelle Kompetenz in interkulturellen Behandlungssituationen.

INTRODUCTION: In many European countries, intercultural treatment situations are an integral part of everyday medical practice. In this context, the appearance of different interest and decision-making conflicts, which result from communication barriers, cultural practice or moral diversity, are not uncommon. In this paper, the characteristics of intercultural treatment situations with their ethical relevance are presented. Some skills and abilities of intercultural competence are also described and their function is demonstrated by a clinical ethical case. The opportunities and limitations of intercultural competence for an ethical orientation are subject of reflection.

Single-rater reliability of a three-dimensional instrument for decision-making in tertiary triage and ICU- prioritization-a case vignette simulation study.

Disconcerting reports from different EU countries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the demand for supporting decision instruments and recommendations in case tertiary triage is needed. COVID-19 patients mainly present sequentially, not parallelly, and therefore ex-post triage scenarios were expected to be more likely than ex-ante ones. Decision-makers in these scenarios may be highly susceptible to second victim and moral injury effects, so that reliable and ethically justifiable algorithms would have been needed in case of overwhelming critical cases.To gather basic information about a potential tertiary triage instrument, we designed a three-dimensional instrument developed by an expert group using the Delphi technique. The instrument focused on three parameters: 1) estimated chance of survival, 2) estimated prognosis of regaining autonomy after treatment, and 3) estimated length of stay in the ICU. To validate and test the instrument, we conducted an anonymous online survey in 5 German hospitals addressing physicians that would have been in charge of decision-making in the case of a mass infection incident. Of about 80 physicians addressed, 47 responded. They were presented with 16 fictional ICU case vignettes (including 3 doublets) which they had to score using the three parameters of the instrument.We detected a good construct validity (Cronbach's Alpha 0.735) and intra-reliability (p < 0.001, Cohens Kappa 0.497 to 0.574), but a low inter-reliability (p < 0.001, Cohen's Kappa 0.252 to 0.327) for the three parameters. The best inter-reliability was detected for the estimated length of stay in the ICU. Further analysis revealed concerns in assessing the prognosis of the potentially remaining autonomy, especially in patients with only physical impairment.In accordance with German recommendations, we concluded that single-rater triage (which might happen in stressful and highly resource-limited situations) should be avoided to ensure patient and health care provider safety. Future work should concentrate on reliable and valid group decision instruments and algorithms and question whether the chance of survival as a single triage parameter should be complemented with other parameters, such as the estimated length of stay in the ICU.

Diversifying stem cell debates: Including Muslim contexts and perspectives.

Greater transcultural and transdisciplinary engagement within Muslim contexts and deliberate inclusion of diverse Muslim voices in the development of international guidelines is required to improve understanding of the state of stem cell science, strengthen thinking about attendant ethical complexities, enhance compliance, deepen public deliberation, increase trust, and strengthen practice standards.

Ethical conflicts in the treatment of fasting Muslim patients with diabetes during Ramadan.

BACKGROUND: For an effective treatment of patients, quality-assured safe implementation of drug therapy is indispensable. Fasting during Ramadan, an essential religious practice for Muslims, affects Muslim diabetics' drug use in a number of different ways. OBJECTIVES: Ethical problems arising from fasting during the month of Ramadan for practicing Muslim patients are being discussed on the basis of extant research literature. Relevant conflicts of interest originating in this situation are being analysed from an ethical perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A number of databases have been searched systematically in view of the stated objectives to identify relevant studies. Starting point for this review are the following questions: What information is available regarding the fasting behaviour of Muslim diabetics during Ramadan? What kind of ethical problems can be identified in the context of this religious practice? RESULTS: The present review established a number of problems concerning medication adherence and drug use of practising Muslim diabetics during Ramadan, notably insufficient compliance, reduced frequency of consultations with their doctor, and inadequate, not sufficiently goal-oriented doctor-patient conversations about fasting. CONCLUSIONS: Deficiencies in medical as well as religious knowledge about fasting in Ramadan and a lack of sensitivity have been found among Muslim patients as well as among doctors. Compliance management and drug use in this area can be improved by effective, goal-oriented action plans and projects through which linguistic and cultural barriers can be addressed.

Ethical Assessment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research According to Turkish Muslim Scholars: First Critical Analysis and Some Reflections.

BACKGROUND: Turkey, with a Muslim population of officially over 99 %, is one of the few secular states in the Muslim world. Although state institutions are not based on Islamic juridical and ethical norms, the latter play a significant role in defining people's attitudes towards controversial issues in the modern world, especially when backed by opinions of Muslim scholars living in Turkey. Accordingly, opinions of Muslim scholars undoubtedly have an important effect on bioethical decisions made by institutions and individuals. OBJECTIVE(S): To explore the ethical positions of Muslim scholars living in Turkey and their arguments used in the ethical assessment of embryonic stem cell research; to discuss the biological-moral tensions arising in medical research on human embryos. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Muslim scholars located in different parts of Turkey. METHODS: Qualitative method, involving the collection of opinions of various scholars, by means of 15 individual semi-structured interviews, evaluated using thematic qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Positions regarding embryonic stem cell research differ among Muslim scholars in Turkey. On the other hand, even where positions are similar, they are often supported by different arguments. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneity of the arguments presented, the dominant position considers embryonic stem cell research as morally acceptable.

Ethical aspects of human embryonic stem cell research in the islamic world: positions and reflections.

Rapid technological developments in human embryonic stem cell research are holding promises of future new medical treatment for a range of currently incurable chronic diseases. At the same time, stem cell research using human embryos raises radically new, previously unimaginable ethical issues posing a dramatic challenge to humankind. By analysing the discourses on these ethical issues we can show that the cultural values and religious convictions of all stakeholders involved play a decisive role in formulating ethical positions. In the Islamic world, too, stem cell research using human embryos provokes new discussions about the moral status of the embryo according to Islamic ethical norms. In our paper we describe the theological and philosophical criteria used in this debate and discuss some ethical positions vis-à-vis embryonic stem cell research formulated in the Islamic world, including official regulations existing in some Muslim countries. While most of the existing literature in this field is primarily descriptive, the present paper endeavours to examine not only the arguments and their historical conditions as such; in addition, we will for the first time provide a critical reflection on the methodology underlying commonly held positions. In our view, this reflection is of paramount importance in establishing a straightforward constructive dialogue between different cultures and academic disciplines.

Ethical aspects of genome diversity research: genome research into cultural diversity or cultural diversity in genome research?

The goal of the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) was to reconstruct the history of human evolution and the historical and geographical distribution of populations with the help of scientific research. Through this kind of research, the entire spectrum of genetic diversity to be found in the human species was to be explored with the hope of generating a better understanding of the history of humankind. An important part of this genome diversity research consists in taking blood and tissue samples from indigenous populations. For various reasons, it has not been possible to execute this project in the planned scope and form to date. Nevertheless, genomic diversity research addresses complex issues which prove to be highly relevant from the perspective of research ethics, transcultural medical ethics, and cultural philosophy. In the article at hand, we discuss these ethical issues as illustrated by the HGDP. This investigation focuses on the confrontation of culturally diverse images of humans and their cosmologies within the framework of genome diversity research and the ethical questions it raises. We argue that in addition to complex questions pertaining to research ethics such as informed consent and autonomy of probands, genome diversity research also has a cultural-philosophical, meta-ethical, and phenomenological dimension which must be taken into account in ethical discourses. Acknowledging this fact, we attempt to show the limits of current guidelines used in international genome diversity studies, following this up by a formulation of theses designed to facilitate an appropriate inquiry and ethical evaluation of intercultural dimensions of genome research.

[Cultural aspects of ethical decisions at the end of life and cultural competence]. / Kulturelle Aspekte bei ethischen Entscheidungen am Lebensende und interkulturelle Kompetenz.

Advances in medical science and technology offer new medical interventions at the end of life. These new medical measures create new ethical issues, which increase in complexity in a multicultural society. This paper discusses three cases, in which cultural value systems play a decisive role. Change in the goals of therapy, truth telling of diagnosis and prognosis and presumed will of the patient are the key ethical points in these cases. Because of growth in minority populations in Germany, it is foreseeable that the number of these issues will increase in the near future. The author of this paper argues that concepts and measurements must be urgently developed in health care systems to help the medical staff in their daily practises. According to him, cultural competence and cultural sensitive advanced directives can be helpful for solving complex ethical problems at the end of life. Other interventions and measurements were also described for improved end-of-life care in multicultural setting.

Bioethical conflicts between Muslim patients and German physicians and the principles of biomedical ethics.

In the age of globalisation, more and more people who are members of different religions and cultures live in the same society. This situation tends to create many conflicts in different areas of life and not least in the health care system, a fact which raises a number of bioethical issues. The cultural and religious differences between patient and physician can be a cause of bioethical conflicts and therefore represent a challenge for biomedical ethics. The confrontation between Turkish Muslin patients and the German health care system is a convenient example of this situation. The Muslim Turks came to Germany 40 years ago as industrial workers. Their value system had been shaped by traditional and Islamic parameters in Turkey. With this value system, they now found themselves in the German modern health care system. In many fields of modern medicine there are areas of potential conflict of values, where a Muslin patient will argue differently from a secular or Christian person. In an ethical conflict between two individuals who are members of different cultures, it is necessary to make sure that the ethical concept which is to be used for resolving the problem is relevant. In this particular case, both the Islamic legal responses (fatwa) and the classical theories of biomedical ethics are often insufficient. This paper tries to give a brief outline of these bioethical conflicts and discuss these conflicts with regard to the principle of respect for autonomy in the concept of "principilism," as introduced by T.L. Beauchamp and J.F. Childress. The central question is whether this bioethical concept is able to analyse and to help solve the kinds of ethical conflicts which involve transcultural dimensions. This question is discussed with some consideration of the ongoing debate about universalism versus relativism in biomedical ethics.