German guidelines for airway management 2023.

The German airway management guidelines are intended to serve as an orientation and decision-making aid and thus contribute to the optimal care of patients undergoing anesthesiologic- and intensive medical care. As part of the pre-anesthesiologic evaluation, anatomical and physiological indications for difficult mask ventilation and intubation shall be evaluated. This includes the assessment of mouth opening, dental status, mandibular protrusion, cervical spine mobility and existing pathologies. The airway shall be secured while maintaining spontaneous breathing if there are predictors or anamnestic indications of difficult or impossible mask ventilation and/or endotracheal intubation. Various techniques can be used here. If there is an unexpectedly difficult airway, a video laryngoscope is recommended after unsuccessful direct laryngoscopy, consequently a video laryngoscope must be available at every anesthesiology workplace. The airway shall primarily be secured with a video laryngoscope in critically ill- and patients at risk of aspiration. Securing the airway using translaryngeal and transtracheal techniques is the "ultima ratio" in airway management. The performance or supervision of airway management in the intensive care unit is the responsibility of experienced physicians and nursing staff. Appropriate education and regular training are essential. Clear communication and interaction between team members are mandatory before every airway management procedure. Once the airway has been secured, the correct position of the endotracheal tube must be verified using capnography.

[Noninvasive evaluation of airways prior to sedation or anesthesia : An update within the framework of the revision of the German S1 guidelines on airway management 2015 of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine]. / Nichtinvasive Evaluation der Atemwege vor Sedierungen oder Narkosen : Update im Rahmen der Überarbeitung der S1-Leitlinie "Atemwegsmanagement" 2015 der DGAI.

As a single and reliable parameter for prediction of the difficult airway is missing, the specialist societies for anesthesiology recommend the use of scores that combine the individual parameters. Contemporary scores include head-neck mobility, mouth opening and anatomical distances. Their training and correct performance are essential. For a broad acceptance the performance has to be easy and fast. In addition, before anesthesia a check must be made for pathological alterations (e.g. tumors) in the head and neck region and the patient history must be thoroughly determined. If the patient reports difficulties with securing the airway in the past, these are likely to occur again if they have not been surgically resolved. This includes an accurate documentation of the airway and knowledge of the in-house standard operating procedure on unexpected difficult airways as well as local equipment. Preparation causes work but may save lives.

[Update Mallampati : Theoretical and practical knowledge of European anesthetists on basic evaluation of airways]. / Update Mallampati : Theoretische und praktische Kenntnisse europäischer Anästhesisten zur Basisevaluation der Atemwege.

In 1985 Mallampati et al. published a non-invasive score for the evaluation of airways (Mallampati grading scale, MGS), which originally consisted of only three different classes and has been modified several times. At present it is mostly used in the version of Samsoon and Young consisting of four different classes. Class I: soft palate, fauces, uvula, palatopharyngeal arch visible, class II: soft palate, fauces, uvula visible, class III: soft palate, base of the uvula visible and class IV: soft palate not visible. Nevertheless, other versions of MGS still exist, each having different values for sensitivity and specification. The current opinion is therefore that MGS is no longer useful as a stand-alone predictor but in combination with others it is still part of today's most relevant guidelines, such as those of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), the UK's Difficult Airway Society (DAS), the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and must therefore be known by anesthetists. Even in times of sophisticated tools for airway management, the procedure remains a high risk, so every anesthetist has to be prepared for and well trained in management of known and unexpected difficult airways. Evaluation of the patient's airway is a part of modern airway management to prevent problems and reduce risk of hypoxia during the procedure. The theoretical knowledge and practical skills of European anesthetists were evaluated at two international congresses, the German Anesthesia Congress (DAC) and Euroanaesthesia 2014. The DAC is an annual meeting of German speaking anesthetists, hosted by the DGAI. The Euroanaesthesia is the annual European pendant hosted by the ESA. Participation was voluntary and only physicians were allowed to take part. Theory was evaluated by a questionnaire containing open and closed questions for MGS that had to be answered by every participant alone. Apart from theory, a practical evaluation was performed. Every participant had to classify the MGS of a human airway model. The model was identical on both congresses. According to the original publication a checklist containing the factors essential for the correct performance was filled out by a supervising experienced anesthetist. During DAC 2014 n = 267 physicians participated in the study, 22 participants were excluded due to inconsistent answers, incomplete questionnaires or missing practical part. A total of 245 data sets were evaluated. During Euroanaesthesia 2014 n = 298 physicians participated in the study, 68 participants were excluded due to inconsistent answers, incomplete questionnaires or missing practical part and 230 data sets were evaluated. At the DAC the mean age (± SD) was 44.5 ± 9.5 years, 157 (64.1%) were male and 88 (35.9%) were female. Working experience was trainee anesthetist in 16.7% and other participants were experienced anesthetists. At the ESA the mean age (± SD) was 42.4 ± 9.5 years, 133 (57.8%) were male and 97 (42.2%) female. Trainee anesthetists were 15.2%, the rest were experienced anesthetists. The DAC participants knew Mallampati classes 1 (65%) and 4 (45%) better than 2 and 3 and there was no relevant differences to the ESA (close to 30% knew the classes 1-4 here). Classification of the airway model was correct in 62% and 67% at DAC and ESA, respectively. Most participants performed the practical evaluation correctly except the sitting position of the model. In agreement with earlier studies, these results show the lack of knowledge in evaluation of airways according to current guidelines of all relevant societies. This is likely to increase preventable risks for patients as unexpected difficult airway management increases the risk for hypoxia and intubation damage.

[Rapid sequence induction and intubation in patients with risk of aspiration : Recommendations for action for practical management of anesthesia]. / "Rapid sequence induction and intubation" beim aspirationsgefährdeten Patienten : Handlungsempfehlungen für das praktische anästhesiologische Management.

BACKGROUND: Induction of general anesthesia in patients with risk for aspiration needs special considerations to avoid the incidence and severity of complications. Since no evidence-based guidelines support the challenge for anesthesiologists various practical recommendations exist in clinical practice for rapid sequence induction and intubation (RSI). The aim of this systematic review is, to summarize the evidence and recommend a decision making process. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multilevel RAND-delphi-method (RAND: Research and Development) combined with systematic literature research, individual assessment and evaluation, consensus conferences and final common sequence. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The consideration of all practical, clinical procedures in patients at risk for aspiration represents an effective prevention of pulmonary aspiration during the induction of anesthesia. These include the optimal drug pre-treatment with antacids (e. g. sodium citrate) for highly aspiration-endangered and proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers in other patients the evening before. Each patient should be examined and explained prior to RSI according to the recommendations of the National German Society of Anesthesiology for preoperative evaluation. A RSI should be performed in patients with no 2h liquid and no 6h food fasting or acute vomiting, sub-ileus or ileus, or no protective reflexes or a gastrointestinal passenger disorder. In addition, RSI should be performed in pregnant women after the 3rd trimester and during birth. The expertise and competence of the physician before and during rapid sequence induction and intubation about the respective task distribution minimizes the risk of aspiration, as does the adequate equipment, as well as an optimized upper body elevation of the patient. Consistent pre-oxygenation with an FIO2 of 1.0 (FetO2-concentration > 0.9) and an oxygen flow > 10 l/min using a completely sealing respiratory mask with capnography should take 3-5 minutes. Fast enough deep anesthesia and muscle relaxation to avoid coughing and choking can be achieved by a combination of opioid, hypnotic and muscle relaxation. In addition, an opioid of choice, propofol, thiopental, etomidate and ketamine can be used as hypnotic and rocuronium with the availability of sugammadex should be used as muscle relaxant. If there are no contraindications, succinylcholine can also be used as a muscle relaxant. In case of an unexpected difficult airway, a 2nd generation extraglottic airway device should be used. During regurgitation or aspiration, intensive medical monitoring and fiber-optic bronchoscopy should be performed, depending on the degree of severity and an X­ray thorax image or a CT scan should be performed if symptoms arise. Three factors reduce the risk of aspiration: expertise, support from an experienced anesthesiologist and close monitoring of an inexperienced anesthesiologist.

Thyromental distance ("Patil") revisited : Knowledge and performance of a basic airway screening tool among European anesthetists.

Predicting and managing the difficult airway is a lifesaving and vital basic task for the anesthetist. Current guidelines of all important societies include thyromental distance (TMD, "Patil") as a possible predictor for a difficult airway and includes two important aspects for airway management: the mandibular space and the flexibility of the cervical spine. We evaluated knowledge and execution regarding TMD for predicting a difficult airway on participants at the Euroanaesthesia (ESA) congress and German Anaesthesia Congress (DAC) in 2014. Our evaluation consisted of a theoretical part with questions regarding general knowledge and a practical evaluation with anesthetists performing on a human airway model. Practical evaluations were performed separately from other participants. During the DAC 245 (ESA 230) physicians participated, of which 64% were male (ESA 58%). At the DAC 182 (74.3%) and ESA 82 (35.6%) participants knew about Patil/TMD. Its use as a predictive score for a difficult airway was known by 122 (49.8%; DAC) and 79 (34.4%; ESA) participants. The correct definition for intubation was given by 45 (25.7%) at the DAC and 56 (24.3%) at ESA. Only 40-41% of the participants measured the correct distance for TMD. Only 6.1-6.5% completed both the theoretical and practical parts correctly. As non-invasive TMD includes two different aspects of patient airways and is part of current guidelines, education and training must be extended to assure adequate evaluation in the future.

[An online emergency physician survey - demography, education and experience of German emergency physicians]. / Demografie, Ausbildung und Erfahrung der Notärzte in Deutschland: www.notarztfragebogen.de.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: German emergency patients are treated by (emergency) physicians (EP). The entry level to emergency medicine differs. Manual skills experience (e. g. tracheal intubation) and knowledge of guidelines are minimum requirements. It is currently unclear who works as an EP and what medical experience he or she has. METHODS: The anonymous survey was online from 10/15/2010 to 11/16/2011 and distribution was supported by leading physicians informing society members. Online networks informed independent physicians. RESULTS: 2091 EP took part, 1991 datasets were evaluated, 100 datasets were excluded. All results are shown as mean ± standard deviation and range (minimum - maximum). Mean age of the EP was 42 ± 8 years (26-71 years), 80 % (n = 1604) were male, 20 % (n = 387) were female. Participants finished medical school in 1997 ± 8 years (1964-2010). Base specialty during rotation was anesthesiology 59 %, internal medicine 32 %, surgery 26 %, trauma surgery/orthopedics 21 %, others 16 %. Consultants were 75 %. Main income source was answered as "hospital physician" by 77 %, "resident doctor" by 15 %, "professional emergency physician" by 7 %. The participants use a widespread chance for CME (Continuing Medical Education). CONCLUSION: The participants appear experienced in medicine and emergency medicine. They use a widespread chance for CME. Most of the participants work in anaesthesiology.

Focused echocardiography entry level: new concept of a 1-day training course.

AIM: We describe a training programme for non-specialists in focused echocardiography in the periresuscitation setting which represents an entry level in echocardiography training (FEEL) for emergency and critical care medicine physicians. METHODS: A prospective observational study based upon the development of a periresuscitation echocardiography training programme developed for novice practitioners (N=15 courses). RESULTS: The programme enables novice echocardiographers to be able to perform a focused echocardiogram in an ALS-compliant manner, and interpret the findings in the context of the clinical scenario. It is based on the concept of blended learning, incorporating a combination of e-learning, web-based teaching and reading selected literature, and attendance at a course. The course comprises 4-hours of theory and 4-hours of hands-on training. CONCLUSIONS: Periresuscitation echocardiography, performed safely, within the competence of practitioners in an ALS-compliant manner is a potentially valuable skill to be acquired by physicians caring for the critically ill, regardless of the environment in which they work, or their level of seniority. This newly-developed blended learning periresuscitation echocardiography programme (FEEL) may serve as entry level in peri-resuscitation echocardiography for both emergency physicians and critical care practitioners.

[Training in emergency sonography for trauma. Concept of a 1-day course program]. / Schulung in Notfallsonographie bei Trauma. Konzept eines eintägigen Kursprogramms.

In the last decade prehospital focused abdominal sonography for trauma (P-FAST) could be established as a valid on-site diagnostic tool for both air and ground rescue medical services in Germany. An appropriate use of P-FAST demands a standardized training concept. Therefore a 1-day training program was developed by the working group "emergency ultrasound" in Frankfurt/Main and was introduced in 2003. The training consists of lectures on general and specific aspects of emergency ultrasound techniques with demonstrations of numerous pathological findings, intensive hands-on training with patients and volunteers, as well as simulated on-site training. After completing the P-FAST course the participants gained competency to perform prehospital emergency ultrasound with high accuracy. Strict application of the exact technique as well as appropriate integration of the adjunct into the algorithm of prehospital care are the most important prerequisites for successful use of P-FAST. From February 2003 to March 2008 540 participants were trained in P-FAST in the 1-day course.