The success of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in lung cancer patients with respiratory failure.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Despite the improvement in survival among patients with lung cancer as a result of the development of novel treatment options, acute respiratory failure (ARF), which may occur because of the disease itself, comorbidities or complications in treatment may be life threatening. The most commonly utilised treatment option in cancer patients with ARF is invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The prognosis of lung cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit is poor. The use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in the setting of ARF not only supports the respiratory muscles and facilitates alveolar ventilation and airway patency, but also reduces the risk of serious complications of IMV, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. NIMV treatment in the event of respiratory failure has been associated with a high rate of mortality in recently diagnosed or progressive lung cancer with organ failure. However, studies in this regard are limited, and the role of NIMV has yet to be investigated in patients in hospital wards. Accordingly, the present study investigates retrospectively the success of NIMV among patients with lung cancer (including all stages and histopathological types) in a hospital ward setting and the influential factors. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The data of 42 patients with lung cancer and respiratory failure who were admitted to the palliative care service and received NIMV between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic features, comorbidities, respiratory failure types, rate of withdrawal from NIMV, frequencies of tracheostomy and intubation, bacteriologic examination of the airway samples, rate of discharge from hospital and any history of NIMV/USOT use at home were recorded. NIMV success was defined as the discharge of the patient from the hospital, with or without a respiratory support device. The primary end-point of the study was NIMV success, while the secondary end-point was NIMV success with respect to the underlying diagnosis and respiratory failure type. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (38 males and 4 females) were included in the study, with a mean age of 67.4 ± 9.5 years. The rate of discharge from hospital was 71% across the entire study population, among which, 13 (31%) were discharged with USOT and 16 (38.1%) with NIMV. Among the 12 patients under palliative supportive treatment, 8 were discharged from the hospital. The success rates of NIMV in the respiratory failure aetiological subgroups were: 66% (12 patients) in the pneumonia subgroup and 71.4% (15 patients) in the COPD subgroup. The difference between these subgroups was not significant (P = .841). The success rate of NIMV in the hypercapnic and hypoxaemic respiratory failure subgroups was 72.7% (24 patients) and 66.6% (6 patients), respectively. There were no significant differences between the type of respiratory failure subgroups (P = .667). The success rate of NIMV was similar in patients with a positive airway sample microbiology (71.4%, n = 14) and those with no growth identified in the culture (70.3%, n = 28) (P = .834). CONCLUSION: In lung cancer patients with no contraindication, NIMV can be used to reduce or postpone the need for ICU admission, independent of disease stage, cellular type and underlying cause.

Treatment outcomes in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Even in oligometastatic stage 4 disease, survival rates are higher when curative approaches focus on both the primary tumour and metastasis. So, we aim to analyse our results of oligometastatic disease retrospectively. METHODS: In total, data on 52 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with limited metastasis (one to three synchronous/metachronous) were retrospectively analysed. All treatment modalities associated with various treatment modalities [surgery, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), supportive care and palliative chemotherapy] were compared in terms of survival. Curative treatment consisted of surgery or CRT (concurrent or sequential). RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) time was 35.2 ± 4.1 months. Surgery was superior to CRT in terms of OS (36.7 months vs 27.4 months, P > 0.05). Progression-free survival was 29.4 ± 3.9 months, and survival after first progression (SAFP) was 15.6 ± 2.8 months. Patients in whom a metastasectomy was performed had significantly higher rate of SAFP as compared with those who did not have a metastasectomy (20.07 ± 3.8 months vs 7.9 ± 1.7 months P = 0.046). According to pathological type, an adenocarcinoma was associated with better SAFP than a non-adenocarcinoma (23 ± 4.1 vs 6.4 ± 1.5, P = 0.002). The 1- and 2-years OS rates were 67% and 50.4%, respectively. Among the curative treatment group, the OS of patients younger than 65 years (n = 25) was 31 months, whereas that of patients older than 65 years (n = 13) was 22 months (P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: In well-selected NSCLC patients with limited metastasis, survival rates can reach up to 3 years, even in a geriatric population. Clinical N staging and co-morbidity are important prognostic factors.

Prognostic significance of preoperative consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio and SUVmax in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Consolidation/tumour (C/T) ratio means the maximum diameter of the consolidation is divided by the maximum diameter of the tumour and it is predictive for pathologic subtypes and prognosis after resection of the tumour. The purpose of this study is to clarify impact of C/T ratio along with maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) in pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Only patients with pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma diagnosed by resection were included. Prognostic impact of C/T ratio and SUVmax were analysed by using regression analyses. RESULTS: Totally 156 patients (121 males, 35 females) were evaluated retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were higher in patients with C/T ratio ≥0.5 (OS: 46.3 ± 23.7 vs 30.4 ± 14.6, P = 0.002 and PFS: 43.0 ± 25.4 vs 27.8 ± 15.8, P = 0.005). But PFS and OS curves did not reveal any significant differences with Kaplan-Meier method (P = 0.45 and P = 0.055 respectively). Resection type (limited vs anatomic) and C/T ratio were predictors for OS in multivariate analyses (resection type: HR: 2.21 (1.01-4.83), P = 0.045 and C/T ratio: HR: 0.44 (0.20-0.98), P = 0.045). For PFS, resection type and SUVmax had prognostic significance (resection type: HR: 3.56 (1.64-7.74), P = 0.001 and SUVmax: HR: 1.31 (0.82-2.99), P = .002). CONCLUSION: In pathological stage 1 lung adenocarcinomas, SUVmax and surgery type are important predictors for recurrence rates. For early stage, adenocarcinoma patients with high SUVmax value, tumour size ≥3 cm and high grade subtype, C/T ratio should not be considered significant alone on survival and recurrence.