Intraosseous Administration of Medications in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Opportunity for Improved Outcomes and Superior Compliance.

Background: Vancomycin is a prophylactic antibiotic with bactericidal activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus that is commonly used in total joint replacement surgery1. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), intraosseous infusions administered following tourniquet inflation have demonstrated improved local vancomycin concentrations with decreased systemic absorption1-3. This administration method results in no adverse reactions locally, as well as equivalent or lower systemic complications compared with other vancomycin administration methods4. Intraosseous infusion of prophylactic surgical antibiotics has been shown to be more effective than intravenous administration, with the potential for reduction in surgical site infections5. Description: After the operative extremity has been prepared and draped in the usual sterile fashion, the limb is elevated and the tourniquet is inflated to 250 mm Hg. Prior to incision, an intraosseous vascular access system (Arrow EZ IO; Teleflex) is inserted with a power driver into the tibial tubercle region. The desired volume of the medication is injected into the tibia. The device is removed and then inserted into the anterior distal femur, centrally, just proximal to the patella. Following this, the desired volume of the medication is injected into the femur. The device is then removed, and the TKA proceeds according to the surgeon's standard technique. Alternatives: Alternative administration methods for vancomycin include other invasive methods and noninvasive delivery. Intravenous delivery is the most traditional form of medication delivery1,2. Additional alternatives include noninvasive placement of antibiotic powder into the wound and localized soft-tissue injections of desired medications1-3. Rationale: Opting to administer antibiotics and other medications intraosseously (rather than intravenously) has shown improved compliance with the golden-hour rule of preoperative antibiotics (especially for vancomycin)4, lower incidences of acute kidney injury or adverse systemic effects4, and improved local tissue concentrations of all medications delivered1-3. Expected Outcomes: Expected outcomes include improved local tissue concentrations with decreased systemic concentrations of vancomycin and with no reported local or systemic adverse reactions, as well as the potential for improved infection prevention1-5. Literature regarding the use of intraosseous infusion during TKA has been thorough and very well received. A prospective, randomized study by Young et al. evaluated local and systemic concentrations of vancomycin following intraosseous versus intravenous administration. The authors found that low-dose intraosseous vancomycin resulted in tissue concentrations equal to or superior to those of systemic administration, also noting that the administration route reduced the infiltration time of the vancomycin without systemic complications1. Local concentrations at the knee were found to be 5 to 9 times greater with intraosseous infusion in patients with a body mass index of >35 kg/m2 as compared with the use of intravenous administration, with no adverse reactions systemically. Local concentrations in this patient population were also found to be comparable to those observed in patients with a lower body mass index2. A recent study assessing the use of intraosseous vancomycin showed that local concentrations of vancomycin were maintained even if the procedure continued beyond the point of tourniquet deflation, with mean concentrations being 5 times higher locally at the end of the procedure in the intraosseous versus the intravenous group3. A separate study showed no adverse systemic reactions and no incidents of acute kidney injury among patients receiving intraosseous vancomycin. An additional study showed that intraosseous administration of vancomycin decreased the incidence of postoperative joint infections compared with traditional intravenous administration5. Newer studies assessing the use of intraosseous infiltration have begun to focus on the delivery of other medications, not just antibiotics. At our institution, we have examined the benefits of intraosseously administrated morphine, which has shown a significant decrease in pain and opioid consumption up to 2 weeks postoperatively. Important Tips: You may run into issues with the medication delivery due to the amount of resistance you encounter. If resistance is too great, you may first attempt to readjust the intraosseous needle depth to improve flow. If resistance is still high, you may consider downsizing to a 30-cc syringe in order to better infiltrate the medication.Note that if you downsize your syringe, you will require more time to infiltrate the desired amount of fluid. An additional way to save time is to open multiple syringes and have them prefilled with your desired medication so that they may be handed off once completed rather than needing to be refilled.A hemostat or pickup may be applied underneath the cuff of the intraosseous needle in order to help remove the needle from the bone. This step is sometimes required because the intraosseous handpieces do not have multidirectional trigger capabilities, and removing the needle can require an upward force to be applied.The use of midline locations allows the small incisions you make for intraosseous infusion to be incorporated into your larger knee incision, with no additional morbidity to the patient.Consider utilizing the medial and/or lateral femoral condyles as landmark locations for infusion if your patient is large. Alternatively, recent literature has shown nearly equivalent results with just the tibial infusion, so you may consider discontinuing the femoral intraosseous infusion if there are consistent issues with successfully initiating the medication delivery. Acronyms and Abbreviations: IO = intraosseousMRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusRCT = randomized controlled trialsIV = intravenousBMI = body mass indexOR = operating room.

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus.

BACKGROUND: Ideal target limb alignment remains a debated topic in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the effect of limb alignment correction on patient-reported outcomes and knee range of motion (ROM) following TKA. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients (N = 409) undergoing primary TKA at a single institution were studied. Using full leg-length radiographs, limb alignment was measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients were categorized by preoperative (Preop) alignment (varus > 0°; valgus < 0°). Preop varus patients were then divided as follows based on postoperative alignment: neutral (VAR-NEUT, 0°± 2), remaining in varus (VAR-rVAR, ≥3°), and cross-over to valgus (VAR-CO, ≤-3°). Similarly, Preop valgus patients were divided as follows for postoperative alignment: neutral (VAL-NEUT, 0°± 2), remaining in valgus (VAL-rVAL, ≤-3°), and cross-over to varus (VAL-CO, ≥3°). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement survey scores were collected at preoperatively as well as at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Knee ROM was collected at 2 weeks, 6 to 12 weeks, and >6 months postoperatively. An analysis of variance repeated on time followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare outcomes for the postoperative alignment subgroups. RESULTS: Preop Varus patients: Those in the VAR-CO group (overcorrected to -4.03° ± 1.95valgus) were observed to have lower Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared to those in the NEUT group (P < .05). This finding was paired with reduced ROM at 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively in the VAR-CO group compared to VAR-NEUT and VAR-rVAR (P < .05). Preop Valgus patients: Those in the VAL-rVal group (left in -4.39° ± 1.39valgus) were observed to have reduced knee flexion at 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively compared to VAL-NEUT and VAL-CO. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that postoperative valgus alignment via either crossing over to valgus (VAR-CO) or remaining in valgus (VAL-rVAL) alignment may result in less preferable outcomes than correction to neutral or slightly varus alignment.

The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Manipulation Under Anesthesia to Treat Postoperative Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) occurs in 4% of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Anti-inflammatory medications may target arthrofibrosis pathogenesis, but the data are limited. This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the effect of adjuvant anti-inflammatory medications with MUA and physical therapy on range of motion (ROM) and outcomes. METHODS: There were 124 patients (124 TKAs) who developed stiffness after primary TKA for osteoarthritis enrolled across 15 institutions. All received MUA when ROM was < 90° at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Randomization proceeded via a permuted block design. Controls received MUA and physical therapy, while the treatment group also received one dose of pre-MUA intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and 14 days of oral celecoxib (200 mg). The ROM and clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks and 1 year. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. RESULTS: The ROM significantly improved a mean of 46° from a pre-MUA ROM of 72 to 118° immediately after MUA (P < .001). The ROM was similar between the treatment and control groups at 6 weeks following MUA (101 versus 99°, respectively; P = .35) and at one year following MUA (108 versus 108°, respectively; P = .98). Clinical outcomes were similar at both end points. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, the addition of intravenous dexamethasone and a short course of oral celecoxib after MUA did not improve ROM or outcomes. However, MUA provided a mean ROM improvement of 46° immediately, 28° at 6 weeks, and 37° at 1 year. Further investigation in regards to dosing, duration, and route of administration of anti-inflammatory medications remains warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, RCT.

Health Status of Total Hip Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients and Possible Effects on Decisions Regarding Surgical Location, Cost, and Access to Care.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are no longer considered inpatient-only procedures. Qualifying for inpatient status reimbursement requires additional, unreimbursed administrative effort, and may limit care to these patients. Purpose: We sought to evaluate and compare the overall health status of patients receiving THA and TKA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review evaluating 2207 patients undergoing primary THA and TKA from 2015 to 2018 at a single institution. Clinical parameters, surgical procedure, medical history, laboratory values, length of stay (LOS), and discharge location were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Results: In 2202 patients, we observed differences for body mass index (THA = 29.4 ± 0.4, TKA = 32.1 ± 0.3), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (THA = 105.8 ± 13.5 mg/dL; TKA = 128.6 ± 13.7 mg/dL), and blood glucose levels (THA = 98.2 ± 1.7 mg/dL; TKA = 101.4 ± 1.3 mg/dL), indicating that TKA patients were more likely than THA patients to be classified as obese, hypercholesterolemic, and hyperglycemic. We observed longer LOS in THA patients (51.25 hours, 95% CI ± 3.87 hours) than in TKA patients (36.93 hours, 95% CI ± 1.17 hours). A greater proportion of TKA patients were discharged home (81.97%, N = 1155) rather than to additional care facilities compared with THA patients (71.84%, N = 539). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, we observed that TKA patients had higher rates of comorbidities than did THA patients, but TKA patients spent less time in the hospital and were more likely to be discharged home. Future studies should evaluate reasons for poor clinical outcomes for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty with an outpatient designation.

Patient Perceptions of Same-Day Discharge Versus Overnight Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty: Results of a Survey.

Background: In the COVID-19 era, there has been increasing interest in same-day discharge (SDD) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, patient perception of SDD is not well reported. Purpose: We sought to understand patients' perceptions and preferences of postoperative care by surveying patients who have completed both an overnight stay (ONS) and an SDD after TJA. Methods: We emailed survey links to 67 patients who previously underwent either 2 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) or 2 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Results: Fifty-two patients (78%) responded to the survey. Thirty-four (65%) patients underwent staged, bilateral TKAs, and 18 (35%) patients underwent staged, bilateral THAs. Overall, 63% of patients preferred their SDD, 12% had no preference, and 25% preferred their ONS, with no difference in preference between TKA and THA groups. Those who preferred their SDD reported being more comfortable at home. Those who preferred their ONS felt their pain and concerns were better addressed. No differences were found in comfort, sleep quality, appetite, burden on family, return to function, feelings of being discharged too soon, overall experience, 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, or readmissions within 30 days between patients' SDD and ONS. There was a small statistically significant difference between patients' perception of safety between SDD and ONS. Conclusion: Our survey found that most patients reported a preference for SDD after TJA over ONS. Although there was a small difference in patient perception of safety, there were no differences in return to the ED or readmissions after SDD and ONS.

Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Can Increase Frequency of Achieving Target Limb Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for Preoperative Valgus Deformity.

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been shown to reduce the number of alignment outliers and to improve component positioning compared to manual TKA (mTKA). The primary purpose of this investigation was to compare the frequency of achieving target postoperative limb alignment and component positioning for rTKA vs mTKA. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed on 250 patients undergoing primary TKA by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Surgeon A performed predominantly rTKA (103 cases) with the ROSA system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) and less frequently mTKA (44 cases) with conventional instrumentation. Surgeon B performed only mTKA (103 cases). Target limb alignment for surgeon A was 0° for all cases and for surgeon B was 2° varus for varus knees and 0° for valgus knees. Radiographic measurements were determined by 2 reviewers. Target zone was set at ± 2 degrees from the predefined target. Results: When comparing rTKA to mTKA performed by different surgeons, there were no differences in the percentage within the target zone (57.28% vs 53.40%, P = .575), but rTKA did result in a greater percentage for cases with preoperative valgus (71.42% vs 44.12%, P = .031). Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 physical scores were statistically higher at both 3 (P = .016) and 6 months (P = .001) postoperatively for rTKA compared to mTKA performed by different surgeons. Conclusions: Although experienced surgeons can achieve target limb alignment correction with similar frequency when comparing rTKA to mTKA for all cases, rTKA may achieve target limb alignment with more accuracy for preoperative valgus deformity. Level of Evidence: Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Management of Hip Abductor Tears and Recalcitrant Trochanteric Bursitis in Native Hips.

Hip abductor tears have recently gained recognition as a more prevalent injury than previously thought. This article will detail the pathophysiology of injury, physical symptoms commonly found at presentation, diagnostic imaging to best diagnose tears and when they should be ordered, and how to properly classify the injury and finally summarize the treatment options available with expert opinions about which are most successful.

A multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac decreases early postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain management regimens and intraosseous infusion of morphine are two novel techniques that show promise in decreasing postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty. However, no study has analyzed the intraosseous infusion of a multimodal pain management regimen in this patient population. The purpose of our investigation was to examine the intraosseous administration of a multimodal pain regimen comprised of morphine and ketorolac during total knee arthroplasty with regard to immediate and 2-week postoperative pain, opioid pain medication intake, and nausea levels. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study with comparisons to a historical control group, 24 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive an intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols while undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Immediate and 2-week postoperative Visual Analog Score (VAS) pain scores, opioid pain medication intake, and nausea levels were recorded and compared against a historical control group that received an intraosseous infusion of morphine alone. RESULTS: During the first four postoperative hours, patients who received the multimodal intraosseous infusion experienced lower VAS pain scores and required less breakthrough intravenous pain medication than those patients in our historical control group. Following this immediate postoperative period, there were no additional differences between groups in terms of pain levels or opioid consumption, and there were no differences in nausea levels between groups at any time. CONCLUSIONS: Our multimodal intraosseous infusion of morphine and ketorolac dosed according to age-based protocols improved immediate postoperative pain levels and reduced opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Otto Aufranc Award: Intraosseous Vancomycin in Total Hip Arthroplasty - Superior Tissue Concentrations and Improved Efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Literature shows that intraosseous (IO) infusions are capable of providing increased local concentrations compared to those administered via intravenous (IV) access. Successes while using the technique for antibiotic prophylaxis administration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prompted consideration for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) however; no study exists for the use of IO vancomycin in THA. METHODS: This single-blinded randomized control trial was performed from December 2020 to May 2022. Twenty patients were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: IV vancomycin (15 mg/kg) given routinely, or IO vancomycin (500 mg/100cc of NS) injected into the greater trochanter during incision. Serum vancomycin levels were collected at incision and closure. Soft tissue vancomycin levels were taken from the gluteus maximus (at start and end of case), and acetabular pulvinar tissue. Bone vancomycin levels were taken from the femoral head, acetabular reamings, and intramedullary bone. Adverse local/systemic reactions, 30-day complications, and 90-day complications were also tracked. RESULTS: A statistically significant reduction in serum vancomycin levels was seen when comparing IO to IV vancomycin at both the start and at the end of the procedure. All local tissue samples had higher concentrations of vancomycin in the IO group. Statistically significant increases were present within the acetabular bone reamings, and approached significance in intramedullary femoral bone. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the utility of IO vancomycin in primary THA with increased local tissue and decreased systemic concentrations. With positive findings in an area without tourniquet use, IO may be considered for antibiotic delivery for alternative procedures.

Alignment options and robotics in total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most widely performed surgical procedures today. Its widespread popularity has helped drive innovation and improvement in the field. Different schools of thought have developed regarding the best way to perform this operation. Specifically, there are controversaries regarding the best alignment philosophy for the femoral and tibial components to optimize implant stability and longevity. Traditionally, neutral mechanical alignment has been the preferred alignment target. More recently, some surgeons advocate for alignment matching the patient's pre-arthritic anatomic alignment ("physiologic" varus or valgus), which has been described as kinematic alignment. Functional alignment is a hybrid technique that focuses on the coronal plane minimizing soft tissue releases. To date, there is no evidence demonstrating superiority of one method over another. There is growing popularity of robotic surgical techniques to improve accuracy of implant position and alignment. The choice of alignment philosophy is an important aspect of robotic assisted TKA surgery and has the potential to clarify the optimal alignment technique.

Greater Trochanteric Fixation Using Cable Plate Devices in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Successful fixation of the greater trochanter (GT) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging task. A wide range of clinical results are reported in the literature despite advancements in fixation technology. Previous studies may have lacked adequate sample sizes to detect differences. This study evaluates nonunion and reoperation rates and determines factors influencing successful fixation of the GT using current-generation cable plate devices. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 76 patients who underwent surgery requiring fixation of their GT and had at least 1-year radiographic follow-up. Indications for a surgery were periprosthetic fracture (n = 25), revision THA requiring an extended trochanteric osteotomy (n = 30), GT fracture (n = 3), GT fracture nonunion (n = 9), and complex primary THA (n = 3). Primary outcomes were radiographic union and reoperation. Secondary objectives were patient and plate factors influencing radiographic union. Results: At a mean radiographic follow-up of 2.5 years, the union rate was 76.3% with a nonunion rate of 23.7%. Twenty-eight patients underwent plate removal, reasons for removal were pain (n = 21), nonunion (n = 5), and hardware failure (n = 2). Seven patients had cable-induced bone loss. Anatomic positioning of the plate (P = .03) and number of cables used (P = .03) were associated with radiographic union. Nonunion was associated with a higher incidence (+30%) of hardware failure due to broken cable(s) (P = .005). Conclusions: Greater trochanteric nonunion remains a problem in THA. Successful fixation using current-generation cable plate devices may be influenced by plate positioning and number of cables used. Plate removal may be required for pain or cable-induced bone loss.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects.

BACKGROUND: Modern fluted titanium-tapered stems (FTTS) have been increasingly utilized to achieve primary stability in conversion and revision total hip arthroplasty with major femoral bone loss. This study sought to determine the radiographic and clinical outcomes of a monoblock FTTS in patients who had major femoral bone loss. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational study of all total hip arthroplasty patients who received a monoblock FTTS who had up to 5-year radiographic follow-up was conducted. Only patients with femoral Paprosky classifications of IIIa, IIIb, and IV were included. Eighty-one monoblock FTTS were examined. Median clinical follow-up was 29 months (range, 18 to 58). Stem subsidence and loosening were assessed on most recent radiographs. All-cause revisions and stem survivals were assessed. RESULTS: Median subsidence was 1.4 millimeters (mm) (range, 0 to 15.0). Sixteen (23.9%) and 3 (4.5%) stems had subsidence greater than 5 and 10 mm, respectively. All stems not acutely revised appeared stable, without evidence of loosening, at latest follow-up. Ten hips (12.3%) required reoperations. Of these, only 5 (6.2%) stems were removed; 4 due to periprosthetic joint infection and 1 for surgical exposure during acetabular revision. Kaplan-Meier analyses yielded an all-cause stem survivorship of 95.1% at 2-years and 87.1% at 4-years. Stem survivorships excluding septic causes was 98.8% at both 2 and 4 years. CONCLUSION: Monoblock FTTS in complex femoral reconstruction cases showed encouraging clinical and radiographic results in patients who had severe femoral bone loss at median 29 months follow-up.

Intraosseous Morphine Decreases Postoperative Pain and Pain Medication Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraosseous (IO) infusion of medication is a novel technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) antibiotic prophylaxis. To decrease postoperative pain in TKA patients, we investigated addition of morphine to a standard IO antibiotic injection. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed on 48 (24 each) consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. The control group received an IO injection of antibiotics as per the standard protocol. The experimental group received an IO antibiotic injection with 10 mg of morphine. Pain, nausea, and opioid use were assessed up to 14 days postoperatively. Morphine and interleukin-6 serum levels were obtained 10 hours postoperatively in a subgroup of 20 patients. RESULTS: The experimental group had lower Visual Analog Scale pain score at 1, 2, 3, and 5 hours postoperatively (P = .0032, P = .005, P = .020, P = .010). This trend continued for postoperative day 1, 2, 8, and 9 (40% reduction, P = .001; 49% reduction, P = .036; 38% reduction, P = .025; 33% reduction, P = .041). The experimental group had lower opioid consumption than the control group for the first 48 hours and second week postsurgery (P < .05). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement scores for the experimental group showed significant improvement at 2 and 8 weeks postsurgery (P < .05). Serum morphine levels in the experimental group were significantly less than the control group 10 hours after IO injection (P = .049). CONCLUSION: IO morphine combined with a standard antibiotic solution demonstrates superior postoperative pain relief immediately and up to 2 weeks. IO morphine is a safe and effective method to lessen postoperative pain in TKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level 1.

Clinical Outcomes for Open Hip Abductor Repair Using Tenodesis and Bone Trough Repair Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Hip abductor complex tears remain an injury without a clear consensus on management. Surgical treatment has been recommended after unsuccessful nonoperative management. This study evaluates both tenodesis and bone trough techniques, with treatment choices guided by previously described tear classification. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 45 hips in 44 patients who underwent surgical treatment for symptomatic, chronic hip abductor tear unresponsive to nonoperative treatment. Demographics and preoperative and postoperative values (including visual analog scale pain scores, gait assessment, and muscle strength) were evaluated. Type I tears were treated using tendon tenodesis. Type II tears were treated through a bone trough repair. RESULTS: Forty-five hips (44 patients) were operated on with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. There were 27 type I and 18 type II tears. Eighty-seven percent of patients were female. Twenty-eight percent of type II patients (5/18) had a preexisting arthroplasty in place. Significant improvements in pain (P < .001), gait (P < .001), and muscle strength (P < .001) were achieved in both the tear types. Type I repairs showed superior results to type II repairs. However, both showed significant improvements. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months showed healed tenodesis in 81% (17/21) of type I tears and 50% (5/10) of type II tears. CONCLUSION: Our study shows improvement in pain and function after surgical repair of hip abductor tendon injuries in both simple and complex tears. This improvement is seen even during ongoing surgical site healing. Magnetic resonance imaging findings may remain abnormal for more than 1 year after surgery and do not clearly denote repair failure.

Cement use in total knee arthroplasty: 40 versus 80 grams.

BACKGROUND: Studies of cement use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have historically addressed mechanical properties and application strategies. Recently, cement technique has been studied as a means to reduce cost. We transitioned from opening two bags (80 grams) of cement to one bag (40 grams) of cement for primary TKA to improve cost efficacy. This study investigates the radiographic outcome and cost of TKAs performed with 40 versus 80 grams of cement. METHODS: TKAs from January 2017 to January 2019 were evaluated. Cement mantle and implant alignment were assessed per the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System at four months by three blinded reviewers. Data was analyzed according to quantity of cement used. Cement mantle quality at 16 implant zones was compared. Cost was evaluated. RESULTS: 163 patients (age 66.8 yrs. +/- 8.9, 51.5% female) underwent TKA with 80 grams of cement, while 142 patients (age 67.1 yrs. +/- 9.3, 56.3% female) underwent TKA utilizing 40 grams of cement. There was no significant difference in cement mantle quality. The most common zone of cement deficiency was the femoral posterior flange (9% in 40 gram group versus 4% in 80 gram group, p value = 0.08). There was no difference in implant size. Cost saving was calculated at $7,810 for the 40 gram group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in radiographic cement mantle appearance between primary knees performed with 40 or 80 grams of cement. Cement usage represents a target for cost saving and opportunity to increase the value of primary TKA. Based on the current incidence of TKA in the United States, cost savings could exceed 33 million dollars annually.

2021 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Intraosseous vancomycin reduces periprosthetic joint infection in primary total knee arthroplasty at 90-day follow-up.

AIMS: Infection complicating primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common reason for revision surgery, hospital readmission, patient morbidity, and mortality. Increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a particular concern. The use of vancomycin as prophylactic agent alone or in combination with cephalosporin has not demonstrated lower periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates, partly due to timing and dosing of intravenous (IV) vancomycin administration, which have proven important factors in effectiveness. This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of primary TKAs examining incidence of PJI, adverse reactions, and complications using IV versus intraosseous (IO) vancomycin at 30-day, 90-day, and one-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,060 patients who underwent TKA between May 2016 to July 2020 was performed. There were 572 patients in the IV group and 488 in the IO group, with minimal 30 days of follow-up. Patients were followed up at regularly scheduled intervals (two, six, and 12 weeks). No differences between groups for age, sex, BMI, or baseline comorbidities existed. The IV group received an IV dose of 15 mg/kg vancomycin given over an hour preceding skin incision. The IO group received a 500 mg dose of vancomycin mixed in 150 ml of normal saline, injected into proximal tibia after tourniquet inflation, before skin incision. All patients received an additional dose of first generation cephalosporin. Evaluation included preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine values, tourniquet time, and adverse reactions attributable to vancomycin. RESULTS: Incidence of PJI with minimum 90-day follow-up was 1.4% (eight knees) in the IV group and 0.22% (one knee) in IO group (p = 0.047). This preliminary report demonstrated an reduction in the incidence of infection in TKA using IO vancomycin combined with a first-generation cephalosporin. While the study suffers from limitations of a retrospective, multi-surgeon investigation, early findings are encouraging. CONCLUSION: IO delivery of vancomycin after tourniquet inflation is a safe and effective alternative to IV administration, eliminating the logistical challenges of timely dosing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):13-17.

Impact of Valgus vs Varus Mechanical Axis Correction During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty on Postoperative Periarticular Bone Mineral Density.

BACKGROUND: Knee periarticular bone mineral density (BMD) is influenced by limb malalignment. The purpose of this study is to determine if the nature and magnitude of alignment correction (ΔAlign°) performed during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had an impact on BMD at the metaphysis of the distal femur (DFmr) and proximal tibia (PTb). METHODS: Seventy-one patients (male = 37 |female = 34; age: 65 ± 2 years) underwent full-length standing X-rays and knee-specific BMD measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and 3 and 6 months following TKA. A t-test was used to compare baseline demographics and knee-specific BMD measures (medial/lateral DFmr/PTb) between patients with preoperative valgus (VAL, N = 18) and varus (VAR, N = 53) malalignment. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine if ΔAlign° correlated with site-specific knee BMD changes. A 2 (varus/valgus) by 3 (time) analysis of variance was used to compare site-specific BMD (%ΔBMD) changes following TKA. Type I error was set at α = 0.05 for all analyses. RESULTS: VAR patients had higher preoperative BMD for medial measurement at both the DFmr (VAR: 1.17 ± 0.06 g/cm2; VAL: 1.00 ± 0.09 g/cm2) and PTb (VAR: 1.41 ± 0.07 g/cm2; VAL: 1.29 ± 0.14 g/cm2) (P < .05). ΔAlign° and %ΔBMD were correlated on the medial side of the DFmr (r = 0.393, P < .05) and lateral/medial BMD ratio at the PTb (r = -0.670, P < .01) in VAL patients. Only VAL patients had significant %ΔBMD changes at 6 months postoperative with increases on the medial side only for the DFmr and PTb (+4%-8%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Valgus patients exhibited reduced medial BMD at DFmr and PTb and showed sustained improvements 6 months postsurgery. Mechanical axis correction may be clinically impactful to bone remodeling when correcting valgus malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Postoperative alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty, a comparison between intra and extra-medullary tibial alignment.

BACKGROUND: Revision total knee arthroplasty commonly involves stemmed components. If the diaphysis is engaged, this technique may be problematic for mechanical alignment (MA) in cases of tibial bowing, which are not infrequent (up to 30%). The aim of this study is to compare an intra-medullary(IM) and extra-medullary(EM) alignment method. We hypothesized that IM technique and canal-filling stems may result more frequently in valgus MA. On the other hand, an EM technique could produce less valgus knees but is at risk of creating MA outliers. METHOD: A retrospective radiographic analysis of revision TKAs was performed. The patients were divided to either the EM or IM alignment group and compared on the overall post-operative MA. The following parameters were measured on standing, long leg x-rays: Hip-knee-Ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). RESULTS: 119 cases of revision TKAs were included (EM = 80, IM = 39). There was a difference between the EM and IM group for the mean mMPTA (89.94° vs 90.92°, effect size = 0.45, p = 0.013) and HKA angle (1.64° vs 0.05°, effect size = 0.52, p = 0.0064). A higher proportion of IM patients were in overall valgus alignment (16/39, 41%) vs EM group (16/80, 20%, p = 0.0134). Both techniques showed the same proportion of outliers, defined as HKA angle more than 5 degrees from neutral mechanical alignment (11/80 vs 5/39, p = 0.286). CONCLUSION: The extra-medullary alignment method with short cemented stems creates less valgus mechanical alignment than the intra-medullary technique with press-fit stems, without creating more MA outliers.

Open Hip Abductor Tendon Repair into a Bone Trough: Improved Outcomes for Hip Abductor Tendon Avulsion.

Hip abductor tendon tears are a well-recognized entity that results in progressive lateral hip pain, weakness, and limping. These can occur in patients with native hips or in patients following total hip arthroplasty. However, treatment of these 2 distinct groups does not differ. We describe a new repair technique utilizing a longitudinal bone trough in the greater trochanter. We compare our results (focusing on gluteus medius tendon avulsions) and traditional repair with suture anchors or transosseous bone tunnels. Additionally, we propose a classification system that attempts to describe the different types of tears to guide treatment, as the current classification system is not helpful in defining pathology or guiding treatment. Our proposed classification will help to better describe tear types anatomically and thereby guide appropriate surgical interventions based on these types. DESCRIPTION: Abductor tears were classified, according to our system, as Type I when there was no gluteus medius avulsion from bone (with subtype A indicating a partial tear of the gluteus minimus or gluteus medius; B, a complete tear of the gluteus minimus; and C, a longitudinal tear of the gluteus medius) or Type II when there was a gluteus medius avulsion (with subtype A indicating an avulsion of <50% of the insertion into the greater trochanter, and B, an avulsion of ≥50% of the insertion). Repair into a bone trough involves (1) freeing up and mobilizing the tendon from overlying fascia, (2) placing 2 evenly spaced Krackow stitches in the tendon, (3) creating a bone trough using a burr in the midline of the greater trochanter, (4) creating bone tunnels out the lateral wall of the trough to pass sutures, and (5) passing sutures through the bone tunnels to allow inset of the tendon into the trough, and later tying the sutures over the lateral osseous bridge. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative treatment options include nonoperative and operative management. Nonoperative treatment choices include physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and activity modification with assistive walking devices. Surgical alternatives include endoscopic or open direct soft-tissue repair, suture anchor repair, bone tunnel repair, graft jacket reconstruction, or gluteus maximus muscle transfer. RATIONALE: Because of discouraging outcomes experienced by us and others, a new technique (a greater trochanter longitudinal bone trough) was developed to improve surgical results. This technique, utilizing an abductor tendon repair into a bone trough, improved our surgical outcomes for abductor tendon avulsions. We found that outcomes after surgical treatment of abductor tendon tears without avulsion are superior to those after repairs of abductor tendon avulsions, which is an important distinction compared with previous literature on abductor tendon repairs.

Clinical outcome evaluation of intraosseous vancomycin in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is a commonly used prophylactic antibiotic for total joint replacement surgery to protect against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Studies have suggested intraosseous (IO) infusions provide superior local tissue antibiotic concentration compared with intravenous (IV) access in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We reviewed patients receiving IO vancomycin before TKA, comparing complication rates to a matched group receiving IV prophylactic vancomycin. METHODS: Retrospective review of TKA patients administered IO vancomycin (500 mg vancomycin in 200 mL normal saline), September 1, 2018 to March 1, 2019, was compared with TKAs performed with prophylactic IV vancomycin, January 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018. Before incision, an IO needle was inserted into the tibial tubercle region, delivering 100 mL of the mixed vancomycin solution. The needle was then removed and inserted into the distal femur, delivering 100 mL of the solution. Evaluation included preoperative and postoperative creatinine values, tourniquet time, and knee-related 30-day and 90-day complications. Data for primary and revision TKA surgery cases were analyzed independently. RESULTS: There were 100 primary and 29 revision TKA cases in the control (IV) arm and 100 primary and 19 revision TKA cases in the intervention (IO) arm, comprising a study group of 248 cases. There were fifteen 30-day complications and eighteen 90-day complications overall. No significant differences in the complication rate or creatinine values were identified between IO and IV groups. CONCLUSIONS: IO vancomycin has an adequate safety profile in primary and revision TKA, eliminating the logistical challenge of timely prophylactic antibiotic administration.