Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047).

BACKGROUND: The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan. RESULTS: In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010-February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8-37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40-21.61]; P = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2-57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26-0.70]; P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Afatinib and Osimertinib for Patients With PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Aim: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib. Results: A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib. Conclusion: In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.

Comparison of the efficacy of first­/second­generation EGFR­tyrosine kinase inhibitors and osimertinib for EGFR­mutant lung cancer with negative or low PD­L1 expression.

In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative or low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, the acquisition rate of the T790M mutation is higher after treatment with first-/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the progression-free survival (PFS) is longer in patients treated with osimertinib. The present study compared the clinical course after the initiation of each EGFR-TKI monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression who were treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. Between June 2013 and November 2023, 26 and 29 patients were treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib, respectively. The PFS time was longer in patients treated with osimertinib (median, 22.5 months) than in those treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 12.9 months). However, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration, defined as the PFS for osimertinib, or the sum of the PFS for first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and sequential osimertinib therapy after the acquisition of the T790M mutation, was similar between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 23.0 months) and osimertinib (median, 22.5 months). The Cox proportional hazard model suggested that there was no significant difference in the EGFR-TKI treatment duration between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and patients treated with osimertinib (hazard ratio, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.13). In conclusion, first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib were associated with a similar EGFR-TKI treatment duration in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. The findings suggested that both treatments are promising for this population.

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101).

BACKGROUND: Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Pure Red Cell Aplasia and Chromosomal Abnormality in a Patient With Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce immune-related adverse events in various organs, thus careful observation is required. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and treated with combined therapy of carboplatin plus pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab. After two cycles of treatment, anemia was noted. Myelosuppression due to cytotoxic anticancer agents was suspected and the cytotoxic agents were discontinued, followed by three courses of pembrolizumab monotherapy. However, the anemia persisted, requiring red blood cell transfusions. A bone marrow biopsy revealed erythroblast hypoplasia and chromosomal abnormalities, resulting in a diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. These adverse events were considered immune-related because of the treatment history with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and 60 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day) of prednisolone was initiated. Anemia improved, and it did not recur during the tapering of prednisolone. CONCLUSION: Immune-related pure red cell aplasia should be considered for patients presenting anemia during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Ineligible for Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Combined therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum doublet chemotherapy has a survival advantage over platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, a variety of factors make it difficult to administer treatment with platinum doublet chemotherapy in many patients in clinical practice and there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients who are ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy. This observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the survival and adverse events from the initiation of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, including pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy. RESULTS: Data from 48 patients were analyzed. Seventeen patients showed a performance status (PS) of ≥2 while 16 and 15 patients were considered ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy because of age and comorbidities, respectively. The median (95% confidential interval, CI) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 48 patients were 7.1 (1.7-13.7) and 31.7 (8.8-not estimated) months, respectively. The two-year PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 30.8% (18.2%-47.2%) and 50.7% (33.7%-67.7%), respectively. In patients with a PS of ≥2, the median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 1.6 (1.2-not estimated) and 5.5 (2.3-not estimated) months, respectively. The two-year PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 34.3% (15.8%-59.2%) and 45.3% (22.2%-70.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a PS of 0-1 who were ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy had favorable outcome after the initiation of ICI therapy, and even in patients with a PS of ≥2, they achieved high two-year PFS and OS rates.

A retrospective study of the efficacy of combined EGFR­TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy vs. EGFR­TKI monotherapy for PD­L1­positive EGFR­mutant non­small cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group 2202.

The present multicenter study was performed to compare the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy with that of combined EGFR-TKI plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF) inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC were collected from 12 institutes. Survival in patients treated with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib (third-generation EGFR-TKI), and combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy was analyzed by multiple regression analysis with adjustments for sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and the presence or absence of brain metastasis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data from a total of 263 patients were analyzed, including 111 (42.2%) patients who had received monotherapy with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, 132 (50.2%) patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy, and 20 (7.6%) patients who had received combined EGFR-TKI plus VEGF inhibitor/cytotoxic therapy (hereafter referred to as combined therapy). Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for progression-free survival was 0.73 (0.54-1.00) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.47 (0.25-0.90) in patients who had received combined therapy. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.98 (0.65-1.48) in the patients who had received osimertinib monotherapy and 0.52 (0.21-1.31) in patients who had received combined therapy. In conclusion, combined therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of progression compared with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy, and therefore, may be promising for the treatment of patients of NSCLC.

Peripheral CD4 memory T cells predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved the prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, compared with cytotoxic agents. However, the prediction of treatment response is often difficult, even after assessing the tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression. We conducted this observational study to analyze the association between the differentiation of peripheral CD4 + T cells and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy between 2020 and 2022. Blood samples were collected at the start of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and the expressions of PD-1, CCR7, and CD45RA in peripheral CD4 + T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The association between the findings of flow cytometry and survival after the initiation of the immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was evaluated. Forty patients with non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that an increased proportion of CD45RA-CD4 + T cells was associated with a reduced risk of progression after adjustment for performance status, tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression level, mutation status of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene, and combined therapy with cytotoxic agents. The present study showed that the proportion of peripheral CD45RA- CD4 + T cells was associated with progression-free survival after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, independent of several clinical factors.

Association Between the Severity of Immune-related Adverse Events and the Prognosis in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), survival is reported to be longer in those experiencing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) in the absence of further treatment after ICI therapy was discontinued because of the emergence of irAEs in patients with NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with NSCLC in whom ICI therapy was discontinued because of the development of irAEs were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the PFS from the last day of administration of ICIs, in the absence of any further treatment. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with NSCLC received treatment with ICIs between January 2016 and December 2021. Among them, ICI therapy was discontinued in 33 patients because of the appearance of irAEs. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS in the absence of any treatment after the last administration of ICIs was 7.2 (4.2-12.3) months. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the severity of irAEs, which were determined to be significantly associated with the PFS in the absence of any further treatment after the last administration of ICI therapy. CONCLUSION: Although the present study showed that the PFS in patients with NSCLC was relatively long in the absence of any further treatment after the last administration of ICIs, the PFS was associated with the severity of the irAEs, and some patients showed early disease progression or death.

Associations of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy efficacy with clinical parameters and tumor­infiltrating CD68­positive cell counts in patients with EGFR­mutant non­small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been less effective in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations than in patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the associations of clinical parameters with the efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Clinical information was retrieved from the medical charts, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed in some cases to determine the tumor-infiltrating CD68-positive cell count. Data from 46 patients were included in the analysis. The median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival and overall survival from the initiation of ICI therapy was 1.4 months (1.0-1.7 months) and 6.4 months (3.9-19.0 months), respectively. Analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model revealed that tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression was associated with the overall survival of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after ICI treatment. The tumor-infiltrating CD68-positive cell count was evaluated in 11 patients. Comparison using the log-rank test revealed that the progression-free survival time after ICI treatment was longer in the patients with lower tumor-infiltrating CD68-positive cell counts than those with higher tumor-infiltrating CD68-positive cell counts. The present analysis demonstrated that PD-L1 expression and the tumor-infiltrating CD68-positive cell count may be associated with the efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have suggested the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. This multicenter observational study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of systemic ICI therapy and chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. METHODS: We analyzed the data of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma who received systemic ICI therapy or chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy between 2016 and 2022. RESULTS: In this study, data of a total of 22 patients who received systemic ICI therapy and four patients who received chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy were analyzed. In the patients who received systemic ICI therapy, the median progression-free survival after initiation of therapy was 9.6 months, and the overall survival did not reach the median. The 1-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate were estimated to be 45.5% and 50.1%, respectively. Although the log-rank test revealed no significant association between the tumor expression level of programmed death ligand-1 (tumor proportion score evaluated using 22C3 antibody: ≥50% vs. <50%) and the survival duration, the majority of patients showing long-term survival showed a tumor proportion score of ≥50%. Of four patients treated with chemoradiation followed by durvalumab therapy, two patients showed an overall survival of ≥30 months, whereas the remaining two patients died within 12 months. CONCLUSION: The progression-free survival of patients who received systemic ICI therapy was 9.6 months, suggesting that ICI therapy might be effective in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.

Real-World Data Analysis of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for NSCLC Using Japanese Postmarketing All-Case Surveillance Data.

Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor that was initially indicated for monotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. The Japanese Lung Cancer Society conducted an observational study on pembrolizumab using confirmative data obtained through postmarketing all-case surveillance (PMACS), which was performed by a pharmaceutical company under the Japanese law in 2017. Methods: This multicenter observational study was conducted by the Japanese Lung Cancer Society using PMACS data with the newly created central registration system regarding patients with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy between February 1, 2017 and June 30, 2017; a new database was created by adding the clinical information regarding prognosis for 3 years after therapy to the existing data collected by PMACS. Results: A total of 300 patients from 43 facilities were enrolled in this study. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after pembrolizumab initiation were 558 and 188 days, respectively. Moreover, the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 58.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Results of multivariate analysis revealed performance status (p < 0.0001), histology (p = 0.0118), previous chemotherapy (p = 0.0007), programmed death-ligand 1 expression status (p = 0.0195), and previous steroid use (p = 0.0460) as significant factors that affected overall survival. The toxicity profile was similar to that previously reported. Conclusions: In this first attempt to use PMACS data, we successfully collected clinical information and found the real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab.

Real-world outcomes of chemotherapy for lung cancer patients undergoing hemodialysis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study (NEJ-042).

INTRODUCTION: Malignant tumors are the major cause of death in hemodialysis patients. Management of these patients remains challenging as there is no evidence that chemotherapy is beneficial, and a lack of information about actual clinical practice. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer from January 2002 to June 2018. We reviewed their clinical information including patient characteristics associated with lung cancer and end-stage renal disease, regimen, efficacy and safety of chemotherapy, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients from 22 institutions in Japan were registered. Of 158 eligible patients, 91 received chemotherapy (80 as palliative chemotherapy and 11 as chemoradiotherapy) and 67 received best supportive care only regardless of cancer stage. In small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy, the objective response rates (ORR) and median overall survival (OS) were 68.1 %, 12.3 months and 37.0 %, 8.5 months, respectively. The ORR and median OS in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) were 44.4 % and 38.6 months. The treatment-related adverse events (Grade 3 or higher) induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy were myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia; treatment-related death (TRD) was observed in one patient. TRD occurred in 3 of 18 patients who received EGFR-TKI. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy should be considered for hemodialysis patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and SCLC. However, the survival benefits of chemotherapy for NSCLC patients with EGFR-wild type are unclear; physicians should carefully consider whether to offer chemotherapy to this patient subset.

Association of Tumor PD-L1 Expression With Time on Treatment Using EGFR-TKIs in Patients With EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The association between tumor PD-L1 expression and the rate of acquisition of the T790M mutation during treatment with first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is a matter of study. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the association of tumor PD-L1 expression with the time on treatment under EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first- /second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs was defined as the sum of progression-free survival period (PFS) from the start of treatment with first- /second-generation EGFR-TKIs and the PFS from the start of osimertinib treatment after acquisition of the T790M mutation. Tumor PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the 22C3 antibody. RESULTS: Data of a total of 49 patients were analyzed, including 20 patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score <1%) and 29 patients with positive tumor PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥1%). In the negative tumor PD-L1 expression group, the T790M mutation was detected in 12 (75%) of the 16 patients. In the positive tumor PD-L1 expression group, the T790M mutation was detected 6 (31.6%) out of the 19 patients in whom it was tested. The median (95% confidence interval) time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs was 21.7 (12.9-24.8) months and 12.3 (5.6-22.2) months in the negative and positive tumor PD-L1 expression groups, respectively. Analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model identified performance status and presence/absence of tumor PD-L1 expression as significantly associated with the time on treatment with EGFR-TKIs. CONCLUSION: EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression showed a higher rate of acquisition of the T790M mutation and implementation rate of osimertinib therapy, leading to a longer time on treatment with EGFR-TKI.

Small cell lung cancer; recent advances of its biology and therapeutic perspective.

Lung cancer is historically divided into two major categories: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the therapeutic efficacy of NSCLC has improved due to the development of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment, there has been very slow progress in the therapeutic advances of SCLC. Since SCLC is a deadly disease with rapid progression and early metastasis and comprises approximately 10% of lung cancer cases, more attention should be given to the therapeutic strategy for SCLC. Most SCLC cases respond to cytotoxic drugs, cisplatin, and etoposide. The objective response rate to the standard regimen is reported to be approximately 70% that is sufficient as standard therapy. However, almost all tumors recur and become refractory to chemotherapy which is the most important problem of this deadly disease. Recently, for the first time in several decades, ICIs have changed the standard therapy for SCLC. It must be emphasized that although ICIs paved the new way for SCLC therapy, more precise and effective therapy for SCLC is desired. Unfortunately, precise molecular mechanisms of SCLC are yet to be understood. Recent elaborate studies on the cell biology of SCLC uncovered several important aspects of molecular mechanisms. Gene profiling of cancer cells can be done using modern technology like next-generation sequencing (NGS). In this minireview, we describe the advances of modern technology in SCLC research and consider future therapeutic strategies based on the molecular mechanisms of SCLC.

Irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment for patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive cancer and recurrence is inevitable. Treatment of recurrent disease is important for improving the prognosis of patients with SCLC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment in patients with SCLC. RESULTS: Data of 15 patients who had received irinotecan monotherapy as third- or further-line treatment between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed. The median progression-free survival duration (95% confidence interval) from the initiation of treatment with irinotecan was 2.7 (1.4-3.8) months, and the median overall survival duration (95% confidence interval) from the initiation of irinotecan treatment was 10.0 (3.9-12.9) months. Partial response, stable disease or non-complete response/non-progressive disease, and progressive disease were observed in 1, 6, and 8 patients, respectively. Adverse events ⩾ grade 3 in severity were observed in 2/2 (100%) patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1 mutation, 2/3 (66.7%) patients who were heterozygous for UGT1A1 mutation, 4/6 (66.7%) patients who had wild-type UGT1A1, and 2/4 (50.0%) patients in whom the UGT1A1 mutation status was unknown. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that irinotecan monotherapy can be a useful alternative treatment option in the third-line setting for patients with SCLC.

Case Series of Pleomorphic Carcinoma of the Lung Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

AIM: We report, herein, three cases of pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Case 1: A 73-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung and treated with pembrolizumab alone. However, he showed no response and died 4 months after the initiation of the treatment. Case 2: A 66-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung. He was started on a combination regimen of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, and a remarkable response was observed. Case 3: A 49-year-old man was diagnosed as having pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung. He was started on pembrolizumab monotherapy as second-line treatment. Eleven months after the treatment initiation, computed tomography revealed the decrease of tumor diameter. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is expected to improve the prognosis of patients with pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Negative or Low Tumor PD-L1 Expression.

Background/Aim: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the survival durations of 25 patients diagnosed as having non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer with negative or low tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Patients and Methods: The progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were calculated from the initiation of ICI monotherapy. The association between the patient characteristics and the PFS was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The median PFS was 2.6 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 9.3%. The median OS was 5.5 months, and the 12-month OS rate was 39.8%. A Cox proportional hazards model identified the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and presence of liver metastasis as being significantly associated with PFS. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a subset of patients with non-squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer who show negative or low tumor PD-L1 expression could benefit from ICI monotherapy.

Association of Tumor PD-L1 Expression with the T790M Mutation and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving EGFR-TKI Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of the epidermal growth receptor gene (EGFR) after first-line treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patient groups with and without tumor expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). METHODS: Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 antibody. T790M gene mutation was evaluated by Cobas EGFR assay using tissues or humoral specimens. RESULTS: Data of 47 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were analyzed. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS in the PD-L1-negative and -positive patient groups were 12.9 (9.7-15.4) months and 9.0 (5.1-12.3) months, respectively (p = 0.029). T790M gene mutation was analyzed in 27 patients. The proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI was higher in the PD-L1-negative patient group than in the PD-L1-positive patient group (8/11 patients (72.7%) vs. 4/16 patients (25.0%); p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with negative tumor PD-L1 expression showed longer PFS and a higher proportion of acquisition of T790M mutation of EGFR after first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI.

Relationship between Patient Characteristics and the Timing of Provision of Explanation about DNAR to Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.

Objective The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between the patient characteristics and the timing of provision of an explanation about "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR)" by attending physicians to advanced lung cancer patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced or postoperative recurrent lung cancer in whom systemic therapy was initiated between 2015 and 2016. Results The data of a total of 74 patients with lung cancer, including 59 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 15 with small cell lung cancer were analyzed. The median overall survival of the patients was 10.0 months. Records of the explanation about DNAR by the physicians were available for 57 of the 74 (77.0%) patients. For 48 (64.9%) patients, the explanation was provided after the discontinuation of anticancer treatment, and for 9 (12.2%) patients, it was provided during the course of anticancer treatment. The provision of an explanation about DNAR during the course of treatment was associated with a poor performance status at the start of treatment (p=0.028), the tumor histology (p=0.037), the presence of driver gene mutation in the tumor (p=0.029), and shorter survival after the discontinuation of anticancer treatment (p<0.001). Conclusion The results suggested that the timing of provision of an explanation about DNAR was associated with patient characteristics and the predicted prognosis.