Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiol Med ; 123(12): 891-903, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039378

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of MDCT in the evaluation of blunt surgically relevant bowel and/or mesenteric injuries (BMIs) using single specific CT signs together with specific pairs of nonspecific signs. METHODS: Fifty-four patients examined with MDCT were divided into two groups: a 'surgical' group of 20 patients-which underwent surgery for blunt BMIs-and a control group of 34 'nonsurgical' trauma patients. Two radiologists with different experience performed a double-blind retrospective evaluation of the images, classifying the patients in the two groups by using only single specific signs; then, the images were reviewed in consensus with a third radiologist and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Subsequently, the frequency of every single sign and of every possible combination of nonspecific signs in the two groups was registered, to find combinations present only in the surgical group; sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using even those specific combinations. RESULTS: At the first consensual evaluation, sensitivity and specificity were 75 and 100%, respectively. Two combinations of nonspecific signs (focal wall thickening + extraluminal air; focal wall thickening + seat belt sign) were found only in surgical patients that did not present any single specific sign: Sensitivity calculated adding those two combinations was 95%, without a decrease in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: MDCT is an accurate technique in the evaluation of blunt surgically relevant BMIs. The single specific CT signs were sufficient for the diagnosis in only 75% of the cases; adding the two specific combinations allowed an increase in sensitivity of 20%.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestinos/lesões , Mesentério/lesões , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Iohexol/análogos & derivados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia
2.
Clin Imaging ; 37(6): 1061-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24012208

RESUMO

This study evaluates retrospectively the accuracy and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography with colon water distension (MSCT-c) in diagnosing bowel (BE) and ureteral (UE) endometriosis. Sixty-four patients underwent MSCT-c and videolaparoscopic surgery. Two radiologists reviewed MSCT-c examinations: sensitivity and specificity were calculated, considering histological exam as reference standard. In the BE cases, the degree of bowel wall infiltration was also assessed. Sensitivity and specificity for both readers were 100% and 97.6% for BE and 72.2% and 100% for UE; the interobserver agreement was excellent. The degree of bowel wall involvement was correctly defined in 90.9% of cases. MSCT-c is an accurate and reproducible technique but-considering the age of the patients-delivers a nonnegligible radiation dose.


Assuntos
Endometriose/diagnóstico por imagem , Enteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Doenças Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ureter/diagnóstico por imagem , Água
3.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 4(4): 517-22, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17605687

RESUMO

Rectal cancer is one of the most common tumors worldwide; it accounts for approximately 25-30% of cancers arising in the large bowel. Owing to greater distribution of screening programs and better attention from both patients and General Practitioners to this disease, in recent years we have observed an increasing number of cases diagnosed in the early stages, with a consequent better prognosis. The improved 5-year survival is also partially due to better, and more accurate, diagnostic techniques and to more curative treatments. In this review, the authors analyze and discuss the more recent diagnostic techniques for an accurate preoperative staging of rectal cancer, highlighting each method's advantages and limits for their routine use in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinais/patologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA