RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis is one of the main reasons for mortality in liver transplant recipients. Since Iran is considered as a tuberculosis-endemic country, the present study aims to evaluate the outcome of latent tuberculosis infection in transplant recipients after liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present analytical cross-sectional study was performed on transplanted patients in Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital in Tehran Iran from 2006 to 2016. All patients with positive tuberculin skin test were enrolled. Variables including demographic information, therapeutic and outcome data were gathered and analyzed. RESULTS: Among 675 transplant recipients, 100 patients had positive tuberculin skin test (14.8%). Sixty seven percent of recipients were men and the mean age was 72.67 ± 1.3 years. All patients' received Isoniazid prophylaxis before transplantation. The mean duration of anti-tuberculosis prophylaxis before and after transplant were 2.7 ± 1.9 and 3.6 ± 5.5 months, respectively. Tuberculosis has not been occurred in none of these patients after a mean follow up time of 45.21 ± 3 months. During the study period, four subjects infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, while their skin test was negative before transplant. CONCLUSION: According to our study, tuberculin skin test is a reliable and sensitive test for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in liver transplant candidates. Isoniazid prophylaxis is well tolerated in patients with end stage liver diseases and liver transplant recipients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Oral tacrolimus administration is the common route of drug delivery. Recent studies suggest sublingual administration of tacrolimus as an alternative route may produce comparable drug trough levels with similar or even lower doses than the oral route, especially in lung transplant recipients; however, most of this research does not encompass intraindividual variations compared between the 2 routes. This study sought to compare the bioavailability and blood trough concentrations of orally and sublingually administered tacrolimus in adult liver transplant recipients by considering intraindividual variations in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six adult liver transplant recipients received their tacrolimus either orally or sublingually within 2 consecutive days. Blood samples to determine tacrolimus concentrations were gathered at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after oral and sublingual tacrolimus administration. Mean data values were used to calculate the pharmacokinetics parameters via the feathering or residual method, using the 1-compartment, first-order elimination pharmacokinetics model. Compared pharmacokinetics parameters included drug bioavailability, maximum blood concentration (C(max)), time to reach maximum blood level (T(max)), and trough blood concentrations. RESULTS: Trough whole blood levels, area under the concentration-time curve, T(max), and C(max) after oral and sublingual administration of tacrolimus were not significantly different (10.4 ± 7.4 vs 11.2 ± 11.3 ng/mL for trough blood concentration, 181.5 ± 114.1 vs 160.8 ± 115.9 ng.h/mL for AUC, 1.9 ± 1.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.7 h for T(max), and 19.9 ± 10.8 vs 17.2 ± 11.7 ng/mL for C(max)). A double-peak phenomenon was observed in some concentration-time profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual tacrolimus administration does provide therapeutic drug concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients. Therefore, sublingual tacrolimus may confidently be considered as an alternative route to oral administration in patients who are unable to swallow their drugs.