Accuracy of one-dimensional templating on linear EOS radiography allows template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Templating for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is routinely performed on two-dimensional standard X-ray images and allows template-directed instrumentation. To date, there is no report on one-dimensional (1D) anteroposterior (AP) templating not requiring specific templating software. We aim to describe a novel technique and explore its reliability, accuracy and potential cost-savings. METHODS: We investigated a consecutive series of TKAs at one institution between January and July 2019. Patients with preoperative low-dose linear AP EOS radiography images were included. Implant component sizes were retrospectively templated on the AP view with the hospitals imaging viewing software by two observers who were blinded to the definitive implant size. Planning accuracy as well as inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated. Cost-savings were estimated based on the reduction of trays indicated by the 1D templating size estimations. RESULTS: A total of 141 consecutive TKAs in 113 patients were included. Accuracy of 1D templating was as follows: exact match in 53% femoral and 63% tibial components, within one size in 96% femoral and 98% tibial components. Overall 58% of TKA components were planned correctly and 97% within one size. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was good (κ = 0.66) and very good (κ = 0.82), respectively. This templating process can reduce instrumentation from six to three trays per case and therefore halve sterilisation costs. CONCLUSIONS: The new 1D templating method using EOS AP imaging predicts component sizes in TKA within one size 97% of the time and can halve the number of instrumentation trays and sterilisation costs.

Erector spinae plane block combined with local infiltration analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: A randomized, placebo controlled, clinical trial.

The erector spinae plane block is an emerging analgesic technique, which is gaining popularity for a large number of procedures. The majority of publications are at the thoracic level and almost all indicate some benefit to patients. However, there have been relatively few randomized controlled trials and even fewer studies at the lumbar level. The aim of this study was to assess whether the erector spinae plane block at the lumbar level would confer early analgesic benefits and improve the quality of recovery in patients undergoing elective unilateral primary hip arthroplasty. Sixty-four patients were randomized to receive an erector spinae plane block at the third lumbar vertebra with either 30milliliters (ml) of 0.2% ropivacaine or 30 ml of 0.9% saline. The patient, anesthetist and assessor were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome was pain on movement at 6 h (numeric rating scale 0-10) with a reduction of 2 points considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery (QoR-15 score), mobilization and length of stay. In this study there was no appreciable analgesic benefit to adding an erector spinae plane block to patients who already receive neuraxial blocks, local anesthetic infiltration and oral multimodal analgesia for elective primary total hip arthroplasty. Both groups were found to have relatively low pain scores and a high quality of recovery with no significant difference in mobilization or length of stay.