Health care setting and severity, symptom burden, and complications in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): a comparison between university hospitals, community hospitals, and office-based physicians.

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) comprise a heterogeneous group of chronic hematological malignancies with significant variations in clinical characteristics. Due to the long survival and the feasibility of oral or subcutaneous therapy, these patients are frequently treated outside of larger academic centers. This analysis was performed to elucidate differences in MPN patients in three different health care settings: university hospitals (UH), community hospitals (CH), and office-based physicians (OBP). The MPN registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia is a non-interventional prospective study including adult patients with an MPN according to WHO criteria (2008). For statistical analysis, descriptive methods and tests for significant differences were used. Besides a different distribution of MPN subtypes between the settings, patients contributed by UH showed an impaired medical condition, a higher comorbidity burden, and more vascular complications. In the risk group analyses, the majority of polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients from UH were classified into the high-risk category due to previous vascular events, while for PV and ET patients in the CH and OBP settings, age was the major parameter for a high-risk categorization. Regarding MPN-directed therapy, PV patients from the UH setting were more likely to receive ruxolitinib within the framework of a clinical trial. In summary, the characteristics and management of patients differed significantly between the three health care settings with a higher burden of vascular events and comorbidities in patients contributed by UH. These differences need to be taken into account for further analyses and design of clinical trials.

Bleeding, thrombosis, and anticoagulation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): analysis from the German SAL-MPN-registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), such as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are at increased risk for thrombosis/thromboembolism and major bleeding. Due to the morbidity and mortality of these events, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents are commonly employed as primary and/or secondary prophylaxis. On the other hand, disease-related bleeding complications (i.e., from esophageal varices) are common in patients with MPN. This analysis was performed to define the frequency of such events, identify risk factors, and assess antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy in a cohort of patients with MPN. METHODS: The MPN registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia is a non-interventional prospective study including adult patients with an MPN according to WHO criteria (2008). For statistical analysis, descriptive methods and tests for significant differences as well as contingency tables were used to identify the odds of potential risk factors for vascular events. RESULTS: MPN subgroups significantly differed in sex distribution, age at diagnosis, blood counts, LDH levels, JAK2V617F positivity, and spleen size (length). While most thromboembolic events occurred around the time of MPN diagnosis, one third of these events occurred after that date. Splanchnic vein thrombosis was most frequent in post-PV-MF and MPN-U patients. The chance of developing a thromboembolic event was significantly elevated if patients suffered from post-PV-MF (OR 3.43; 95% CI = 1.39-8.48) and splenomegaly (OR 1.76; 95% CI = 1.15-2.71). Significant odds for major bleeding were previous thromboembolic events (OR = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.36-5.40), splenomegaly (OR = 2.22; 95% CI 1.01-4.89), and the administration of heparin (OR = 5.64; 95% CI = 1.84-17.34). Major bleeding episodes were significantly less frequent in ET patients compared to other MPN subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Together, this report on an unselected "real-world" cohort of German MPN patients reveals important data on the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of thromboembolic and major bleeding complications of MPN.

Novel and emerging drugs for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

During the last decades advanced treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia have enabled the shift from rather ineffective palliative treatment to therapies that are aiming for long lasting complete remission and prolongation of survival. This remarkable progress was achieved by combining conventional chemotherapy with monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab and alemtuzumab. Despite this improvement, CLL remains an incurable disease and all patients will eventually relapse and become refractory to treatment. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative option but is feasible only in a minority of patients due to the comorbidity and impaired physical fitness of many patients, since the mean age at first diagnosis lies between 70 and 75 years. Therefore, novel less-toxic therapeutic agents are needed, particularly for patients with comorbidities or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Research in the field of CLL and growing understanding of the pathogenesis of B-cell lymphomas has produced a wide variety of new substances for different targets, e.g. different novel monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents and inhibitors targeting different kinases of B-cell receptor signalling cascade, such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K). This article reviews novel drugs that were recently developed for the use in CLL. The agents discussed in this article were selected for having already shown preliminary evidence of clinical activity.