Does rapid maxillary expansion improve nasal airway obstruction? A computer fluid dynamics study in patients with nasal mucosa hypertrophy and obstructive adenoids.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) expands the maxillary dentition laterally and improves nasal airway obstruction. However, the incidence of nasal airway obstruction improvement after RME is approximately 60%. This study aimed to clarify the beneficial effects of RME on nasal airway obstruction in specific pathologic nasal airway diseases (nasal mucosa hypertrophy and obstructive adenoids) using computer fluid dynamics. METHODS: Sixty subjects (21 boys; mean age 9.1 years) were divided into 3 groups according to their nasal airway condition (control, nasal mucosa hypertrophy, and obstructive adenoids), and those requiring RME had cone-beam computed tomography images taken before and after RME. These data were used to evaluate the nasal airway ventilation condition (pressure) using computer fluid dynamics and measure the cross-sectional area of the nasal airway. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the nasal airway significantly increased after RME in all 3 groups. The pressures in the control and nasal mucosa groups significantly reduced after RME but did not change significantly in the adenoid group. The incidence of improvement in nasal airway obstruction in the control, nasal mucosa, and adenoid groups was 90.0%, 31.6%, and 23.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of improvement in nasal airway obstruction after RME depends on the nasal airway condition (nasal mucosa hypertrophy and obstructive adenoids). In patients with nonpathologic nasal airway conditions, the obstruction may be sufficiently improved with RME. Furthermore, to some extent, RME may be effective in treating nasal mucosa hypertrophy. However, because of obstructive adenoids, RME was ineffective in patients with nasal airway obstruction.

A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of Japanese adults and its usefulness in orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to establish a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis of craniofacial morphology and discuss its theoretical usefulness in orthognathic patients. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of Japanese subjects with skeletal Class I malocclusion before treatment were selected from among 1000 patients so that samples matched a historic 2D cephalometric cohort with normal occlusion using propensity score matching. In each CBCT image, 67 3D measurements were calculated based on manually identified landmarks. The mean and standard deviation of the measurements were calculated and used as the normative range for each sex. To confirm the usefulness of the 3D measurements, pre- and post-treatment CT data of nine jaw deformity patients who underwent orthognathic surgery with two-dimensional planning (2DP) in the past were used. Pre- and post-treatment CT values were evaluated with a paired t-test as well as a Z-score, which was calculated using the aforementioned normative range, and then categorized into five groups ("deteriorated", "no improvement", "over-treatment", "no change", "improvement") with -1 < Z-score < 1 considered normal. Fifty-six patients were matched to normal skeletal 1 subjects. The normative range of 67 items indicating 3D craniofacial morphology of the Japanese was calculated. Postoperatively, the horizontal position of the pogonion to the mid-sagittal plane significantly decreased (p = 0.043) and "improved"; however, the ramus axis on the right side significantly increased (p = 0.005) and "deteriorated". Maxillary yaw and the horizontal position of the gonion also tended to "deteriorated". The normative range for the 3D cephalometric analysis in Japanese has been established. Given findings of deteriorated maxillomandibular yawing after surgery when using conventional 2DP, 3D cephalometric measurements should be used when planning jaw positions after surgery for orthognathic patients.