Investigation of the risk factors in the development of radionecrosis in patients with brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence, timing, and the factors predictors radionecrosis (RN) development in brain metastases (BMs) undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS: The study evaluated 245 BMs who exclusively received SRT between 2010 and 2020. RN was detected pathologically or radiologically. RESULTS: The median of follow-up was 22.6 months. RN was detected in 18.4% of the metastatic lesions, and 3.3% symptomatic, 15.1% asymptomatic. The median time of RN was 22.8 months (2.5-39.5), and the rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 16.8%, 41.4%, and 66%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that Graded Prognostic Assessment (P = .005), Score Index of Radiosurgery (P = .015), Recursive Partitioning Analysis (P = .011), the presence of primary cancer (P = .004), and localization (P = .048) significantly increased the incidence of RN. No significant relationship between RN and brain-gross tumour volume doses, planning target volume, fractionation, dose (P > .05). Multivariate analysis identified SIR > 6 (OR: 1.30, P = .021), primary of breast tumour (OR: 2.33, P = .031) and supratentorial localization (OR: 3.64, P = .025) as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: SRT is used effectively in BMs. The incidence of RN following SRT is undeniably frequent. It was observed that the incidence rate increased as the follow-up period increased. We showed that brain-GTV doses are not predictive of RN development, unlike other publications. In study, a high SIR score and supratentorial localization were identified as factors that increased the risk of RN. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: RN is still a common complication after SRT. Symptomatic RN is a significant cause of morbidity. The causes of RN are still not clearly identified. In many publications, brain dose and volumes have been found to be effective in RN. But, with this study, we found that brain dose volumes and fractionation did not increase the incidence of RN when brain doses were taken into account. The most important factor in the development of RN was found to be related to long survival after SRT.

Predictors of local control after robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: 10-years-experience after Cyberknife installation.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the factors influencing brain metastases (BM) local control (LC) after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, a cohort of 145 patients (246 BM) treated consecutively with robotic radiosurgery was analysed. RESULTS: Median age was 61 years (range, 29-90 years). Median radiological follow-up of the lesions was 21.7 months (range, 3-115 months). The mean overall survival and LC were 33.0 and 82.7 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, sex, primary cancer site, histological type, use of systemic steroids, maximum diameter, volume, early MRI response, isodose line, number of fractions, BED10 value, and BED10 value proportional to volume and maximum diameter were significant factors for LC. On multivariate analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.10 P: 0.035), adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 6.54 P: 0.001), no steroid use (HR: 3.60 P: 0.001), maximum diameter (≤1 cm) (HR: 2.64 P: 0.018), complete response of lesion at first follow-up MRI compared to stable or progressive disease (HR: 4.20, P = 0.024; HR: 19.15, P < 0.001), isodose line (≥90%) (HR: 2.00 P: 0.036), and tumour volume (PTV ≤2 cc) (HR: 5.19 P: 0.001) were independent factors improving LC. CONCLUSIONS: SRT is an effective treatment for patients with a limited number of BM with a high LC rate. There are many factors related to the patient, tumour, and radiotherapy plan that have an impact on LC after SRT in brain metastases. These results warrant further investigation in a prospective setting.

Is fractionated robotic stereotactic body radiosurgery optional salvage treatment for the re-irradiation of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Purpose: Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after previous radiation therapy is a significant problem. This study was to determine the potential benefits from re-irradiation by fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (FSRT) on survival benefits and effects of severe late toxicities. Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2018, treatment outcomes were evaluated retrospectively in 26 patients with locally recurrent NPC treated using FSRT with CyberKnife. Five patients who had metastatic disease and one who had second recurrence were excluded from the study, and the remaining 20 patients were analyzed. The median age was 52 years (range, 28-80 years); re-treatment T stage was as follows: 6 (30%) - T2, 5 (25%) - T3, and 9 (45%) - T4. The median time from initial RT to recurrence was 22 months (range, 8-159 months). The median re-irradiation FSRT dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions. Results: The median follow-up was 44 months; the overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival, and disease progression-free survival rates at 3 years were 89%, 73%, and 53%, respectively. All patients were evaluated for response after treatment: 9 (45%) had complete, 3 (15%) had partial, and 6 (30%) had no response. Univariate analysis demonstrated that higher cumulative total radiotherapy dose, gross tumor volume, and recurrent time interval were prognostic factors for local failure-free survival. The recurrent time interval was also an independent factor for progression-free survival and OS. The incidence of temporal lobe necrosis and trismus was 10% and 20%, respectively. One patient had Grade 5 toxicity to treatment-related bleeding. Conclusion: Tumor dose coverage is important for treating recurrent NPC, and treatment-related mortality was vascular in nature. FSRT is a promising treatment modality for recurrent NPC.

Prognostic factors in medically inoperable early stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR): Turkish Radiation Oncology Society Multicentric Study.

OBJECTIVE: We identified factors influencing outcomes in patients with medically inoperable early stage lung cancer (MIESLC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) at 14 centers in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 431 patients with stage I-II MIESLC treated with SABR from 2009 through 2017. Age; sex; performance score; imaging technique; tumor histology and size; disease stage radiation dose, fraction and biologically effective dose with an α/ß ratio of 10 (BED10 ); tumor location and treatment center were evaluated for associations with overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and toxicity. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 27 months (range 1-115); median SABR dose was 54 Gy (range 30-70) given in a median three fractions (range 1-10); median BED10 was 151 Gy (range 48-180). Tumors were peripheral in 285 patients (66.1%), central in 69 (16%) and <1 cm from mediastinal structures in 77 (17.9%). Response was evaluated with PET/CT in most cases at a median 3 months after SABR. Response rates were: 48% complete, 36.7% partial, 7.9% stable and 7.4% progression. LC rates were 97.1% at 1 year, 92.6% at 2 years and 91.2% at 3 years; corresponding OS rates were 92.6%, 80.6% and 72.7%. On multivariate analysis, BED10 > 100 Gy (P = .011), adenocarcinoma (P = .025) and complete response on first evaluation (P = .007) predicted favorable LC. BED10 > 120 Gy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.2, P = .019) and tumor size (<2 cm HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-3, P = .003) predicted favorable OS. No grade 4-5 acute side effects were observed; late effects were grade ≤3 pneumonitis (18 [4.2%]), chest wall pain (11 [2.5%]) and rib fracture (1 [0.2%]). CONCLUSION: SABR produced encouraging results, with satisfactory LC and OS and minimal toxicity. BED10 > 120 Gy was needed for better LC and OS for large, non-adenocarcinoma tumors.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Valid Salvage Treatment Option.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease. Recurrence is inevitable despite initial surgery and postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the standard treatment in selected patients. Chemotherapy, biological agents, and re-irradiation are other treatment approaches available. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is nowadays a common treatment as a salvage treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of 132 GBM cases treated between 2010 and 2018. All patients received TMZ and radiotherapy after surgery or biopsy. Among the patients who had recurrence, we identified 42 cases treated with salvage SRT. The CyberKnife robotic system was used to administer SRT. RESULTS: While the median follow-up time for all patients was 16 months (range 1-123), the median follow-up time for patients treated with SRT after initial diagnosis was 26.5 months (range 9-123). The median follow-up time after SRT was 10 months (range 2-107). SRT was performed in a median of 3 fractions (range 2-5). The median prescription dose was 20 Gy (range 18-30). While the median actuarial survival after initial diagnosis for patients treated with salvage SRT was 30 months (range 9-123), it was only 14 months (range 1-111) for patients who could not be treated with salvage SRT (p = 0.001). The median survival time after SRT was 12 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 48 and 9%, respectively. The time to progression after SRT was 5 months (range 1-62), and 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival rates were 50 and 22%, respectively. Patients with longer time to recurrence >12 months had longer overall survival with respect to the ones having recurrence <12 months (p < 0.001). Salvage surgery had been performed in 7 out of 42 patients before SRT. These reoperated patients had significantly worse survival after SRT when compared to the patients who underwent SRT alone (p = 0.02). SRT was well tolerated and there was no grade III/IV toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SRT is a viable salvage treatment option for recurrent GBM. SRT provides acceptable local control and survival benefit for recurrent GBM cases. SRT can be considered especially in patients with long time to recurrence.

Is stereotactic body radiotherapy an alternative to surgery in early stage non small cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE: To determine local control and overall survival of patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. METHODS: Included were a total of 52 patients (7;13% females and 45;87% males) with medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC and who were treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT) by a CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy machine between 2009 and 2017. Depending on tumor size and location, median 45 Gy (30-60) were delivered in median 3 fractions (3-5) to Planning Target Volume. As regards the tumor-tracking system; X-Sight lung tracking system was used in 43 (83%) patients, gold fiducials in 4 (8%) patients, and X-Sight spine tracking system in 5 (9%) patients. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 67 years (54-86). Tumor was staged as cT1 in 38 (73%) patients and cT2 in 14 (27%) patients. Median follow up was found to be 23 months (10-84 months). Median survival time was 38 months and, 1-3-5 year survival rates were respectively 94%-53%-33.6%. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 8 (15%) patients and recurrence was local only in 4 (8%) patients, while it was regional only in 3 (6%) and distant only in 12 (23%) patients. During follow up, local, regional and distant recurrence was detected in 27 (52%) cases and median progression free survival was found to be 25 months. 1-3-5 year progression free survival was 71.2%-39%-26%, respectively. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in only one patient; no grade 4-5 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: A high local control rate with no major toxicity was obtained by SBRT in the patients with medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC. In the near future, SBRT may be an alternative that has growing evidence to support comparable outcomes in selected stage I patients.