Combined Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy and Cesarean Delivery in BRCA1/2 Alteration Carriers : A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The cumulative lifetime risk of ovarian cancer is 16-68% and 11-30% in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene alteration carriers, respectively. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the only proven way to reduce ovarian cancer mortality. We report a series of patients who underwent risk-reducing surgery at the time of planned obstetric-indicated cesarean delivery. CASES: This is a case series of four women carrying a pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alteration who underwent RRSO at the time of cesarean delivery between March 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022. All women were referred during pregnancy to the University College London Hospitals Familial Cancer Clinic for consideration of RRSO at the time of obstetric-indicated cesarean delivery. Women were considered eligible for RRSO if they had a proven pathogenic germline alteration, would have completed childbearing after the cesarean delivery, and were older than age 35 or 40 years with BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations, respectively. Operating time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, complications, and ability to breastfeed were assessed and, where possible, compared with the institutional means for similar patients who underwent cesarean delivery only, to determine whether RRSO was associated with increased morbidity. Women were contacted 11-59 months postprocedure to assess satisfaction. The mean blood loss was 687 mL (range 400-1,000 mL), mean operating time was 68 minutes, mean length of hospital stay was 3 days, and mean change in hemoglobin was -1 g/dL. No patient required a transfusion, had internal organ damage, returned to the operating room, or was readmitted. One of two women with intact breast tissue successfully breastfed, and the other chose to bottle feed. The mean contemporaneous institutional blood loss for cesarean delivery was not significantly different at 681 mL for singleton pregnancies and 872 mL for twin pregnancies. All four women reported a high level of satisfaction with the combined procedure. CONCLUSION: Our results show that RRSO can be performed at the time of cesarean delivery with high patient satisfaction. This approach can be offered to appropriately counseled individuals, with the benefit of avoiding the need for two separate procedures, with potentially reduced patient morbidity and health care costs.

Patient-centred consent in women's health: does it really work in antenatal and intra-partum care?

BACKGROUND: Legal and social changes mean that information sharing and consent in antenatal and intrapartum settings is contentious, poorly understood and uncertain for healthcare professionals. This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' views and experiences of the consent process in antenatal and intrapartum care. METHODS: Qualitative research performed in a large urban teaching hospital in London. Fifteen healthcare professionals (obstetricians and midwives) participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Data were collectively analysed to identify themes in the experiences of the consent process. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) Shared decision-making and shared responsibility -engaging women in dialogue is often difficult and, even when achieved, women are not always able or do not wish to share responsibility for decisions (2) Second-guessing women - assessing what is important to a woman is inherently difficult so healthcare professionals sometimes feel forced to anticipate a woman's views (3) Challenging professional contexts - healthcare professionals are disquieted by consent practice in the Labour ward setting which is often at odds with legal and professional guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is a mismatch between what is required of healthcare professionals to effect an antenatal or intrapartum consent process concordant with current legal and professional guidance and what can be achieved in practice. If consent, as currently articulated, is to remain the barometer for current practice, healthcare professionals need more support in ways of enabling women to make decisions which healthcare professionals feel confident are autonomous whatever the circumstances of the consultation.

Consent in pregnancy - an observational study of ante-natal care in the context of Montgomery: all about risk?

BACKGROUND: How to best support pregnant women in making truly autonomous decisions which accord with current consent law is poorly understood and problematic for them and their healthcare professionals. This observational study examined a range of ante-natal consultations where consent for an intervention took place to determine key themes during the encounter. METHODS: Qualitative research in a large urban teaching hospital in London. Sixteen consultations between pregnant women and their healthcare professionals (nine obstetricians and three midwives) where ante-natal interventions were discussed and consent was documented were directly observed. Data were collectively analysed to identify key themes characterising the consent process. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: 1) Clinical framing - by framing the consultation in terms of the clinical decision to be made HCPs miss the opportunity to assess what really matters to a pregnant woman. For many women the opportunity to feel that their previous experiences had been 'heard' was an important but sometimes neglected prelude to the ensuing consultation; 2) Clinical risk dominated narrative - all consultations were dominated by information related to risk; discussion of reasonable alternatives was not always observed and women's understanding of information was seldom verified making compliance with current law questionable; 3) Parallel narrative - woman-centred experience - for pregnant women social factors such as the place of birth and partner influences were as or more important than considerations of clinical risk yet were often missed by HCPs; 4) Cross cutting narrative - genuine dialogue - we observed variably effective interaction between the clinical (2) and patient (3) narratives influenced by trust and empathy and explicit empowering language by HCPs. CONCLUSION: We found that ante-natal consultations that include consent for interventions are dominated by clinical framing and risk, and explore the woman-centred narrative less well. Current UK law requires consent consultations to include explicit effort to gauge a woman's preferences and values, yet consultations seem to fail to achieve such understanding. At the very least, consultations may be improved by the addition of opening questions along the lines of 'what matters to you most?'

Consent in pregnancy: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of women and their healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Consent in antenatal settings is contentious, poorly understood and recognised as problematic for pregnant women. This study aimed to investigate participants' views and experiences of the consent process. DESIGN: Qualitative research performed in a large urban teaching hospital in London. Sixteen pregnant women and fifteen healthcare professionals (obstetricians and midwives) participated. Consent consultations were observed and in-depth interviews carried out with healthcare professionals and pregnant women using semi-structured interview guides. Data were collectively analysed to identify themes in the experiences of the consent process. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: 1) Choice and shared decision-making. Pregnant women do not always experience consent in a choice-making way and often do not understand information provided to them. 2) Contextualising information disclosure. What is important to women is not only the information but the relational context in which consent is obtained. 3) Quality of HCP-woman relationship. Trust in their healthcare professional sometimes makes women seek less information and conversely. Individualised information is desired by women but professionals found it difficult to ensure that women receive this in practice. 4) Law and professional practice. Doctors are more aware of legal developments in consent related to the Montgomery case than their midwifery colleagues, but they are not always certain of the implications. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that an effective antenatal consent process which empowers pregnant women requires their understanding of provided information to be elicited. There is a delicate balance to be struck between the trust of a patient in their professional and information-based consent, rather than a simple focus on improving information provision. Whilst recognising women's desire for bespoke consent professionals acknowledged the difficulty of ensuring this in practice. If consent is to remain the legal yardstick of autonomous choice-making, women's understanding and that shared with their healthcare professional needs to be more explicitly addressed.

Postpartum Pyomyoma, a Rare Complication of Sepsis Associated with Chorioamnionitis and Massive Postpartum Haemorrhage Treated with an Intrauterine Balloon.

We report the successful treatment of a postpartum pyomyoma, a rare but serious complication of uterine leiomyomata in a 28-year-old primigravida. The patient was treated for an Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) urinary tract infection (UTI) at 16 weeks of gestation. She had asymptomatic short cervical length on ultrasound scan at 20 weeks that was managed conservatively due to the presence of further UTI and received antibiotics. She was known to have a left sided intramural leiomyoma. She presented with abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding at 23(+1) weeks of gestation and the next day she had spontaneous vaginal delivery and collapsed with E. Coli septic shock, massive postpartum haemorrhage, and disseminated intravascular coagulation and was successfully treated with oxytocic drugs, a Rusch intrauterine balloon, and intravenous antibiotics. Eleven days postnatally she re-presented with systemic sepsis and was treated for retained products of conception. Sepsis persisted and investigations showed a postpartum pyomyoma that was initially managed with intravenous antibiotics to avoid surgery. Ultimately she required laparotomy, drainage of pyomyoma, and myomectomy. Postoperative recovery was good and the patient had a successful pregnancy two years later.

Gastroschisis with intestinal atresia--predictive value of antenatal diagnosis and outcome of postnatal treatment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate (1) the predictive value of fetal bowel dilatation (FBD) for intestinal atresia in gastroschisis and (2) the postnatal management and outcome of this condition. METHODS: A retrospective review of all gastroschisis cases diagnosed in our fetal medicine unit between 1992 and 2010 and treated postnatally in our center was performed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty cases had full postnatal data available. Intestinal atresia was found at surgery in 14 neonates (jejunum, n = 6; ileum, n = 3; ascending colon, n = 3; multiple, n = 2). Polyhydramnios and FBD were more likely in the atresia group compared with infants with no atresia (P = .0003 and P = .005, respectively). Fetal bowel dilatation had 99% negative predictive value (95% confidence interval, 0.9-0.99) and 17% positive predictive value (95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.3) for atresia. Treatment of intestinal atresia included primary anastomosis (n = 5), delayed anastomosis (n = 2), and stoma formation followed by anastomosis (n = 7). Infants with atresia had longer duration of parenteral nutrition, higher incidence of sepsis, and cholestasis compared with infants with no atresia (P = .0003). However, the presence of atresia did not increase mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Polyhydramnios and FBD are associated with atresia. Absence of FBD in gastroschisis excludes intestinal atresia. In our experience, atresia is associated with a longer duration of parenteral nutrition but does not influence mortality. These findings may be relevant for antenatal counseling.