Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
OTA Int ; 5(4): e210, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36569107

RESUMO

Objective: To determine whether local aqueous tobramycin injection in combination with systemic perioperative IV antibiotic prophylaxis will reduce the rate of fracture-related infection (FRI) after open fracture fixation. Other Outcomes of Interest: (1) To compare fracture nonunion rates and report differences between treatment and control groups and (2) compare bacterial speciation and antibiotic sensitivity among groups that develop FRI. Design: Phase 3 prospective, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Two level 1 trauma centers. Participants: Six hundred subjects (300 in study/tobramycin group and 300 in control/standard practice group) will be enrolled and assigned to the study group or control group using a randomization table. Patients with open extremity fractures that receive definitive internal surgical fixation will be considered. Intervention: Aqueous local tobramycin will be injected into the wound cavity (down to bone) after debridement, irrigation, and fixation, following closure. Main Outcome Measurements: Outcomes will look at the presence or absence of FRI, the rate of fracture nonunion, and determine speciation of gram-negative and Staph bacteria in each group with a FRI. Results: Not applicable. Conclusion: The proposed work will determine whether local tobramycin delivery plus perioperative standard antibiotic synergism will minimize the occurrence of open extremity FRI. Level of Evidence: Level 1.

2.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(5): 1002-1008, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFFs) is often complicated by poor bone quality and limited bone stock making fixation attempts challenging and prone to failure. Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is being used to treat such injuries although outcome data are mostly from small case series. We sought to systematically review the literature on DFR for PDFF to summarize their outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Database were searched to identify reports of PDFFs treated with DFR. Articles reporting on 5 or more knees were systematically reviewed for clinical function, complications, and mortality. Random effects meta-analysis was used to create summary estimates and publication bias also assessed. RESULTS: Of 287 identified and screened articles, 15 were included, 14 retrospective, reporting on 352 knees. Following DFR, 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-95) of patients were able to ambulate. The mean postoperative Knee Society Score was 80 (95% CI 77-84). The risk of periprosthetic joint infection was 4.3% (95% CI 2.2-8.2). One-year postoperative mortality rate was 10% (95% CI 6-18). There was some evidence of publication bias with a trend toward smaller studies reporting lower infection risk and mortality. CONCLUSION: DFR for PDFFs is associated with high functional outcomes and a relatively modest risk of infection. The periprosthetic joint infection and 1-year mortality rates reported here should be considered lower bounds estimates due to publication bias and loss to follow-up. Further investigation of long-term outcomes following DFR for PDFFs is warranted though short-term functional outcomes are promising.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/complicações , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(7): e283-e288, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34962234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pre-existing psychiatric disorder is associated with potentially unnecessary fasciotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS: All the patients with orthopaedic trauma undergoing leg fasciotomy at an academic Level I trauma center from 2006 to 2020. INTERVENTION: Pre-existing diagnosis of psychiatric disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Early primary wound closure and delayed primary wound closure. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients were included. Twenty-seven patients (23%) had a pre-existing diagnosis of psychiatric disorder with 13 having anxiety, 14 depression, 5 bipolar disorder, and 2 ADHD. Several patients had multiple diagnoses. Fifty-one patients (44%) had early primary closure (EPC), and 65 patients (56%) had delayed primary closure. Of patients with a psychiatric disorder, 52% received EPC compared with 42% of patients without a disorder, P = 0.38. This lack of a strong association did not seem to vary across specific psychiatric conditions. After adjusting for sex, age, injury type, and substance abuse, there was still no significant association between a psychiatric disorder and EPC with an odds ratio of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.43-2.75). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with orthopaedic trauma undergoing emergent fasciotomy for acute compartment syndrome, a psychiatric disorder was not associated with a significantly increased rate of possibly unnecessary fasciotomy. Given the potential for a psychiatric condition to complicate the diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome, this data is somewhat reassuring; however, there remains a need for continued vigilance in treating patients with psychiatric conditions and research in this area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Síndromes Compartimentais , Transtornos Mentais , Síndromes Compartimentais/diagnóstico , Síndromes Compartimentais/cirurgia , Fasciotomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
JBJS Rev ; 9(10)2021 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637409

RESUMO

¼: Hypercoagulable disorders (HCDs) can be inherited or acquired. An HCD of either etiology increases the chance of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). ¼: Patients with an HCD often have the condition discovered only after surgical complications. ¼: We recommend that patients with a concern for or a known HCD be referred to the appropriate hematological specialist for workup and treatment. ¼: Tourniquet use in the orthopaedic patient with an HCD is understudied and controversial. We recommend that tourniquets be avoided in the surgical management of patients with an HCD, if possible. When tourniquets are applied to patients with unknown HCD status, close follow-up and vigilant postoperative examinations should be undertaken.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Torniquetes/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...