Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccination for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel and Celiac Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend measuring antibody (Ab) titers to hepatitis B virus (HBV) after vaccination for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or celiac disease (CD) ("patients with IBD/CD") and revaccinating when titers are low. Few data, however, support this recommendation. We aimed to compare effectiveness of HBV vaccination (immunity and infection rates) for patients with IBD/CD vs matched referents. METHODS: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients first diagnosed with IBD/CD (index date) while residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2019. HBV screening results were obtained from health records. RESULTS: In 1264 incident cases of IBD/CD, only 6 HBV infections were diagnosed before the index date. A total of 351 IBD/CD cases had documented receipt of 2 or more HBV vaccines before their index date and had hepatitis B surface antigen Ab (anti-HBs) titers measured after their index date. The proportion of patients with HBV-protective titers (≥10 mIU/mL) decreased with time before plateauing, with protective titer rates of 45% at 5 up to 10 years and 41% at 15 up to 20 years after the last HBV vaccination. The proportion of referents with protective titers also decreased with time and was consistently higher than the levels of patients with IBD/CD within 15 years after the last HBV vaccination. However, no new HBV infection developed in any of 1258 patients with IBD/CD during a median follow-up of 9.4 years (interquartile range, 5.0-14.1 years). CONCLUSIONS: Routine testing of anti-HBs titers may not be indicated for fully vaccinated patients with IBD/CD. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings in other settings and populations.

The Characteristics of Isolated Bulb Celiac Disease in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Mucosal injury in celiac disease (CD) patients can be patchy, and up to 12% of CD patients can have mucosal changes limited to the duodenal bulb. Hence, recent guidelines recommend obtaining bulb biopsies in addition to distal duodenum. This study aimed to describe a cohort of children with isolated bulb CD and assess the benefit of separating bulb biopsies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review between January 2011 and January 2022 at 2 medical centers was conducted. We included children with CD who underwent endoscopy with separated biopsies from the bulb and distal duodenum. A blinded pathologist performed Marsh-Oberhuber grading on selected cases. RESULTS: We identified 224 CD patients, of which 33 (15%) had histologically confirmed isolated bulb CD. Patients with isolated bulb CD were older at diagnosis (10 vs 8 years; P = 0.03). Median anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG IgA) level was lower in isolate bulb CD (2.8 vs 16.7 times the upper limit of normal [ULN], P < 0.001). Almost 88% (29/33) of isolated bulb CD patients had an anti-TTG IgA value of less than 10 times the ULN. Time to anti-TTG IgA normalization (mean 14 months) was similar between the 2 groups. A pathologist review of diagnostic biopsies could not distinguish between the bulb and distal duodenum biopsies in approximately one-third of the reviewed samples. CONCLUSIONS: Separating bulb from distal duodenum biopsies can be considered during CD diagnosis, particularly in children with anti-TTG IgA levels less than 10 times the ULN. Larger prospective cohorts are needed to decide whether isolated bulb CD is a unique cohort or an early stage of the conventional CD.