Indirect cholecystoduodenal fistula via hepatoduodenal ligament secondary to gangrenous cholecystitis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystoduodenal fistula is an infrequent complication of gallbladder diseases. In the majority of cases, the fistula is formed by direct communication between the gallbladder and duodenum due to gallstone impaction in the gallbladder neck. We herein report a rare case of indirect cholecystoduodenal fistula via the hepatoduodenal ligament secondary to gangrenous cholecystitis. CASE PRESENTATION: An 80-year-old woman suspected of having emphysematous cholecystitis by a previous doctor was referred to our hospital for urgent surgery. The initial diagnosis based on additional examinations was gangrenous cholecystitis penetrating the hepatoduodenal ligament. Since she did not complain of signs of peritonitis and was taking an anticoagulant medicine, we avoided surgery and selected percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) instead. Contrast imaging of the PTGBD tube and upper endoscopy identified the indirect cholecystoduodenal fistula via the hepatoduodenal ligament. Despite repeated attempts at endoscopic fistula closure using clips, the fistula did not close successfully. We therefore performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fistula closure. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful, and she left the hospital on postoperative day 15. The resected gallbladder contained small black stones, and a histological examination revealed gangrenous cholecystitis with no malignant signatures. CONCLUSION: We encountered a rare case of indirect cholecystoduodenal fistula via the hepatoduodenal ligament secondary to gangrenous cholecystitis that was successfully treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fistula closure. It is important to recognize the possible formation of indirect cholecystoduodenal fistula in cases of gangrenous cholecystitis penetrating the hepatoduodenal ligament.

Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. METHODS/DESIGN: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability. DISCUSSION: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021.https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025.

Successful endoscopic diagnosis of angiosarcoma of the small intestine: A case report.

A 51-year-old man had hematochezia, anemia, and an intraabdominal mass. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy showed no significant lesions with intraluminal bleeding, while radiological examinations showed bulky swelling of the lymph nodes around the abdominal aorta and a tumor in the left ischial bone. Small intestine endoscopy detected a dark purpuric protruding tumor of the jejunum and its biopsy specimen brought a definitive diagnosis of primary jejunal epithelioid angiosarcoma from positive staining of AE1/AE3, CD31, and erythroblast transformation specific related gene in immunohistochemical studies. The patient underwent surgical resection with adjuvant chemotherapy but died of progression of metastases 7 months after the diagnosis. Epithelioid angiosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract is an extremely rare malignancy with poor prognosis and it is challenging to distinguish from undifferentiated carcinoma or melanoma. Immunohistochemistry is necessary for a definitive diagnosis. Sufficient biopsy specimen may aid a prompt diagnosis of this disease of the small intestine, which may present as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Do synbiotics really enhance beneficial synbiotics effect on defecation symptoms in healthy adults?: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

GOALS: We examined whether synbiotics enhance improvement by probiotics. BACKGROUND: Probiotics, which are beneficial microbacteria, are a nutritional intervention for treatment of functional constipation or its tendency. Prebiotics, meanwhile, can promote the proliferation of probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract and enhance their beneficial effects. Synbiotics, a combination of probiotics and prebiotics, may be superior to probiotics in the treatment of defecation-related symptoms, but this requires elucidation. STUDY: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 69 healthy adults with constipation tendency. Participants were allocated to either control, probiotics, or synbiotics groups and they recorded details of their defecations and their condition. The first 2 weeks were the observation period and the latter 2 weeks were the intervention period, in which participants took test foods. Probiotic foods included Bifidobacterium longum NT strain (1010 CFU/day), synbiotic foods included the NT strain (1010 CFU/day) and galactooligosaccharide (1 g/day). Placebo foods contained the vehicle only. Participants answered questionnaires (Patient Assessment on Constipation Symptoms [PAC-SYM], and one on dietary history) on the last day of each period. RESULTS: Nine participants withdrew consent, and 2 of the remaining 60 had missing data. Age, body mass index, and sex were not significantly different between the 3 groups. Frequency of bowel movements in the fourth week, the primary endpoint, was not increased in the probiotics or synbiotics groups compared with the control group, and the frequency of bowel movements and days with defecation were not changed by probiotics or synbiotics during the intervention period. Probiotics and synbiotics did not improve stool conditions, although incomplete defecation was improved by probiotics but not by synbiotics compared with placebo. PAC-SYM indicated that stool condition and total scores were improved by probiotics but not by synbiotics during the intervention compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: The probiotic strain Bifidobacterium longum NT can improve constipation symptoms, especially stool condition, but it does not increase bowel movement frequency in healthy adults with constipation tendency. Synbiotics treatment seemed to diminish this improvement of constipation induced by probiotics. This study indicates the possibility of attenuation of beneficial effects from probiotics by the use of synbiotics, contrary to synbiotics theory.

Potential Effectiveness of Tolvaptan to Improve Ascites Unresponsive to Standard Diuretics and Overall Survival in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After tolvaptan was approved for the treatment of cirrhosis patients with ascites, only a few studies have reported its efficacy in the real clinical setting, and no studies have reported its contribution to overall survival. This study clarified the clinical outcomes of tolvaptan treatment in terms of improving ascites unresponsive to standard diuretics (AUS) and overall survival. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 80 decompensated cirrhosis patients with AUS who were administered tolvaptan from October 2012 to December 2014. The patients were divided into two groups according to ascites improvement. We compared laboratory results and overall survival and analyzed factors that affected overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 59 (73.8 %) were male and the median age was 70 years. Thirty-nine (48.8 %) patients were Child-Pugh class C, and 36 (45.0 %) had advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tolvaptan was effective in 48 (60.0 %) patients with an average 3.8 kg weight reduction and ineffective in 32 (40.0 %) patients. The cumulative survival rate differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.0001), with 87.5 and 68.0 % survival at 30 and 90 days, respectively, in the effective group, and 50.0 and 30.5 % survival, respectively, in the ineffective group. Multivariate analysis showed that improvement in AUS, advanced HCC, total bilirubin level, blood urea nitrogen level, and the presence of hyponatremia were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan could possibly improve overall survival in decompensated cirrhosis patients with AUS as long as it was demonstrated to be effective in these patients.

Efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization followed by sorafenib for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients in Japan: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib might prevent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence caused by the promotion of neoangiogenesis after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by sorafenib for treating advanced HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 95 advanced HCC patients treated with TACE between July 2008 and December 2012 at our institution. Twenty-four patients received TACE followed by sorafenib within 14 days (S-TACE) and 71 received TACE alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative survival from the time of non-responsiveness to TACE were compared between groups and predictive factors for PFS were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 72.2 years and 74 patients were male (77.9 %). Although median tumor size was similar between groups, the mean tumor number was significantly higher in the S-TACE versus TACE-alone group (16 vs. 8, P = 0.04). The number of prior treatments was significantly higher in the S-TACE group. Other baseline variables were similar. There were two severe adverse events in the S-TACE group and none in the TACE-alone group. Median PFS (189 vs. 106 days, P = 0.02) and median overall survival time (861 vs. 467 days, P = 0.01) from the time of non-responsiveness to TACE were significantly longer with S-TACE than TACE alone. Adjusting for significant factors in univariate analysis, multivariate analysis indicated that sorafenib administration, tumor size, and alanine transaminase were independent predictors of PFS. CONCLUSION: TACE followed by sorafenib significantly improved PFS and survival in patients with advanced HCC unresponsive to TACE.

Efficacy of tolvaptan in patients with refractory ascites in a clinical setting.

AIM: To elucidate the efficacies of tolvaptan (TLV) as a treatment for refractory ascites compared with conventional treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 120 refractory ascites patients between January 1, 2009 and September 31, 2014. Sixty patients were treated with oral TLV at a starting dose of 3.75 mg/d in addition to sodium restriction (> 7 g/d), albumin infusion (10-20 g/wk), and standard diuretic therapy (20-60 mg/d furosemide and 25-50 mg/d spironolactone) and 60 patients with large volume paracentesis in addition to sodium restriction (less than 7 g/d), albumin infusion (10-20 g/wk), and standard diuretic therapy (20-120 mg/d furosemide and 25-150 mg/d spironolactone). Patient demographics and laboratory data, including liver function, were not matched due to the small number of patients. Continuous variables were analyzed by unpaired t-test or paired t-test. Fisher's exact test was applied in cases comparing two nominal variables. We analyzed factors affecting clinical outcomes using receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariate regression analysis. We also used multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis to elucidate the risk factors that contributed to the increased incidence of ascites. RESULTS: TLV was effective in 38 (63.3%) patients. The best cut-off values for urine output and reduced urine osmolality as measures of refractory ascites improvement were > 1800 mL within the first 24 h and > 30%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that > 25% reduced urine osmolality [odds ratio (OR) = 20.7; P < 0.01] and positive hepatitis C viral antibodies (OR = 5.93; P = 0.05) were positively correlated with an improvement of refractory ascites, while the total bilirubin level per 1.0 mg/dL (OR = 0.57; P = 0.02) was negatively correlated with improvement. In comparing the TLV group and controls, only the serum sodium level was significantly lower in the TLV group (133 mEq/L vs 136 mEq/L; P = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups. The cumulative incidence rate was significantly higher in the control group with a median incidence time of 30 d in the TLV group and 20 d in the control group (P = 0.01). Cox hazard proportional multivariate analysis indicated that the use of TLV (OR = 0.58; P < 0.01), uncontrolled liver neoplasms (OR = 1.92; P < 0.01), total bilirubin level per 1.0 mg/dL (OR = 1.10; P < 0.01), and higher sodium level per 1.0 mEq/L (OR = 0.94; P < 0.01) were independent factors that contributed to incidence. CONCLUSION: Administration of TLV results in better control of refractory ascites and reduced the incidence of additional invasive procedures or hospitalization compared with conventional ascites treatments.