Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Chemother ; 34(2): 103-109, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424136

RESUMO

Recent studies have shown that the incidence of nephrotoxicity increases when vancomycin is combined with a beta-lactam antibiotic. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients who received vancomycin with either piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT), cefepime (VC), or meropenem (VM). This was a single center retrospective chart review. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, received 48 hours of combination therapy and antibiotics were started within 24 hours of each other. Exclusion criteria were receiving more than one combination of antibiotics, serum creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, AKI at the time of inclusion, or any form of renal replacement therapy. Two hundred patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 (13%) patients experienced AKI. The incidence of AKI was 21.6%, 9%, and 7.4% in the VPT, VC and VM groups, respectively. A patient who received VPT was 5 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to a patient who received VC (adjusted OR 5.09 95% CI (1.51-17.08), p = 0.008) and 7 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to VM (adjusted OR 7.03 95% CI (1.97-28.08), p = 0.002). This study found a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AKI in patient receiving VPT when compared to VC or VM. This finding supports the need for careful monitoring of renal function in patients receiving VPT therapy and routine evaluation for de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Vancomicina , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Cefepima/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Incidência , Meropeném/efeitos adversos , Piperacilina/efeitos adversos , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos
2.
J Perioper Pract ; 32(11): 286-294, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34301162

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a wide ranging incidence of venous thromboembolism after surgery and it continues to be a major cause of morbidity after spinal procedures.This study's aim was to investigate the relationship between timing and administration of venous thromboembolism (VTE) pharmacologic chemoprophylaxis after spinal surgery and the resulting VTE and bleeding complications by reviewing current practices and outcomes at a high-volume single institution to better define opportunities for perioperative intervention to prevent VTE without increasing bleeding complications. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective one or two-stage lumbar spinal fusion procedures were identified. A logistic regression was used to evaluate (1) risk of symptomatic VTE within 30 days of surgery and (2) bleeding-related complications. The odds of developing a VTE as well as bleeding-related complications were compared among the three treatment groups: no chemoprophylaxis, chemoprophylaxis < 24h of surgery and chemoprophylaxis given > 24h post-surgery. RESULTS: When adjusted for doses administered, the odds of developing a postoperative VTE within 30 days were 0.189 (95% confidence interval (0.044, 0.808)) in patients who received anticoagulation < 24h postoperatively, compared to those who received no anticoagulation (p = 0.025). There was no difference in bleeding rates. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective spinal surgery who received anticoagulation within 24h of the conclusion of their procedure had an 81% reduction in the odds of developing a deep vein thrombosis within 30 days with no significant difference in bleeding complications.


Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Medição de Risco
3.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 84(8): ajpe7534, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32934381

RESUMO

Objective. To measure Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' confidence and assess their performance when processing inpatient medication orders, and to determine students' opinions regarding electronic health record (EHR) technology. Methods. Using an EHR platform, students processed inpatient medication orders during two laboratory sessions and one assessment. Each student was assigned one unique patient per session and was given three inpatient orders to process. Medication errors were randomly imbedded in the medication orders. Students needed to determine if the order was acceptable or required flagging because of an identified error. Pre- and post-activity surveys were administered to assess students' level of confidence and perceptions regarding the simulated EHR activities. Aggregate performance scores were compared between a cohort of PharmD students that used an EHR for the activity versus those who completed the activity the previous year using a paper-based medication form. Results. One hundred eight of 158 students (68%) in the course had pre- and post-activity survey data that could be paired. Less than one quarter (24%) of students had prior work experience in a hospital setting. For the medication verification questions, the confidence levels of students who used the EHR doubled and in some cases tripled pre- and post-EHR implementation. In each of the areas surveyed, results for all medication order processing statements were significant. Student performance improved significantly compared with that of those who completed the activity the previous year using a paper-based medication form. Post-EHR implementation, a significantly lower number of students felt that learning to use EHR technology would prepare them for advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Conclusion. Exposure to EHR technology improved PharmD students' confidence and performance scores related to processing inpatient medication orders. These findings support the continued use of an EHR platform in skills-based activities.


Assuntos
Educação em Farmácia/métodos , Educação em Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Estudantes de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Currículo , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Aprendizagem , Assistência Farmacêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tecnologia/métodos
4.
A A Pract ; 13(3): 96-98, 2019 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920426

RESUMO

Intravenous lidocaine is increasingly being utilized as an opioid-sparing analgesic. A 55-year-old man with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus on highly active antiretroviral therapy was prescribed a lidocaine infusion at 1 mg/kg/h for postoperative pain. On postoperative day 2, the patient experienced 4 unresponsive episodes with tachycardia, hypertension, and oxygen desaturation. Serum lidocaine level was available 2 days later (high 6.3 µg/mL, therapeutic range 2.5-3.5 µg/mL). There is significant pharmacokinetic interaction between lidocaine and this patient's human immunodeficiency virus medications. This case highlights the need for a readily accessible list of medications that caution against lidocaine. We propose in-house serum lidocaine levels to monitor patients at an increased risk for toxicity.


Assuntos
Anestésicos/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Anestésicos/sangue , Anestésicos/farmacocinética , Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacocinética , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Lidocaína/sangue , Lidocaína/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório
5.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 80(8): 137, 2016 Oct 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27899833

RESUMO

Objective. To implement and assess the perceived impact of a program designed to engage postgraduate year-2 (PGY2) pharmacy residents in formal co-evaluation of platform presentations at a regional residency conference. Design. A PGY2 formal co-evaluator program was designed and conducted over two years. Postgraduate year-2 residents were paired with a preceptor for modeling, coaching, and facilitating. To assess the perceived usefulness of this program, a 2-question presurvey and an 11-question postsurvey were distributed to participating residents. Assessment. Eighty-two residents completed the program and pre/postsurveys (response rate=94.3%). The percentage of residents who rated themselves as skilled in critically evaluating a platform presentation increased from 56.1% to 100%, while the percentage of residents who rated themselves as skilled in providing constructive feedback increased from 67.1% to 98.8%. Conclusion. This novel program, which was designed to engage PGY2 pharmacy residents in formal platform presentation co-evaluation, was well received and improved resident self-reported skills.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Farmácia/métodos , Internato não Médico/métodos , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Avaliação Educacional , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Mentores , Modelos Educacionais , Farmacêuticos , Preceptoria , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...