Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a sensory and emotional experience that is influenced by physiologic, sensory, affective, cognitive, socio-cultural, and behavioral factors. Consistent with the perspective to improve the postoperative pain control, the present study has the purpose of assessing the effect of presurgical clinical factors, psychological and demographic characteristics as predictors for reporting moderate to intense acute postoperative pain. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed with 346 inpatients undergoing abdominal elective surgery (ASA physical status I-III, age range 18-60 years). The measuring instruments were Pain Visual Analog Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Multivariate conditional regression modeling was used to determine independent predictors for moderate to intense acute postoperative pain. RESULTS: Moderate to intense acute postoperative pain was associated with status ASA III (odds ratio (OR) = 1.99), age (OR = 4.72), preoperative moderate to intense pain (OR = 2.96), chronic pain (OR = 1.75), high trait-anxiety and depressive mood moderate to intense (OR = 1.74 and OR = 2.00, respectively). Patients undergoing surgery to treat cancer presented lower risk for reporting moderate to intense pain OR = 0.39, as well as those that received the epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia with systemic opioid (OR = 0.09 and OR = 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of predictive factors for intense acute postoperative pain may be useful for designing specific preventive interventions to relieve patient suffering. Especially because few of these variables are accessible for medical intervention, which would improve the clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients at risk of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain.

Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

In a double blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have assessed the effects of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain scores in 112 ASA I-II women, aged 18-65 years, scheduled to undergo total abdominal hysterectomy. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive either oral diazepam 10 mg (n=56) or placebo (n=56) pre-operatively. Postoperative anxiety, pain scores, analgesic consumption, and sedation were evaluated at several time points during the first 24 h following surgery. Postoperative pain scores were found to be significantly higher in the diazepam group. Trait and state anxiety showed a significant effect on pain scores, independent of the treatment group. No difference was found between the groups in morphine consumption, but there was a significant reduction in morphine consumption with time.

Risk factors for postoperative anxiety in adults.

We identified risk factors for postoperative anxiety and quantified their effect on 712 adults between 18 and 60 years of age (ASA I-III physical status) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia, neural blockade or both. The measuring instruments were a structured questionnaire, a pain visual analogue scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, a Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20, and a Self-Perception of Future Questionnaire. Multivariate conditional regression modelling taking into account the hierarchical relationship between risk factors revealed that postoperative anxiety was associated with ASA status III (OR = 1.48), history of smoking (1.62), moderate to intense postoperative pain (OR = 2.62) and high pain rating index (OR = 2.35), minor psychiatric disorders (OR = 1.87), pre-operative state-anxiety (OR = 2.65), and negative future perception (OR = 2.20). Neural block anaesthesia (OR = 0.72), systemic multimodal analgesia (OR = 0.62) and neuroaxial opioids with or without local anaesthesia (OR = 0.63) were found to be protective factors against postoperative anxiety.

Risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo surgery experience acute psychological distress in the preoperative period. The objective of this study was to identify and quantify the effect of risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with 592 inpatients scheduled for elective surgery. Age ranged from 18 to 60 years (ASA physical status I-III). Demographic information was collected using a structured questionnaire. The measuring instruments were a visual analog scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the WHO Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20, and the future self-perception questionnaire. Multivariate conditional regression modeling was used to control confounding factors and to determine independent predictors of preoperative anxiety, taking into account the hierarchical relationship between risk factors. RESULTS: High preoperative anxiety was associated with history of cancer (odds ratio (OR)=2.26) and smoking (OR=7.47), psychiatric disorders (OR=5.93), negative future perception (OR= 2.30), moderate to intense depressive symptoms (3.22), high trait-anxiety (3.83), moderate to intense pain (2.12), medium surgery (OR=1.52), female gender (OR=2.0), ASA category III (OR=3.41), up to 12 years of education (OR=1.36), and more than 12 years of education (OR=1.68). Previous surgery (OR= 0.61) was associated with lower risk for preoperative state-anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: History of cancer and smoking, psychiatric disorders, negative future perception, moderate to intense depressive symptoms, high trait-anxiety, moderate to intense pain, medium surgery, female gender, ASA category III, up to 12 years of education and more than 12 years of education constituted independent risk factors for preoperative state-anxiety. Previous surgery reduced the risk for preoperative anxiety.

Primary health workers in north east Brazil.

One approach to providing primary health care in developing countries is to implement programs which rely on minimally trained primary health workers (PHWs). Originally, such programs were primarily designed for rural areas with intact social structures--where a community--based PHW could easily establish a link between the community and the conventional health services (delivery programs). However, faced with increasing migration of the rural population to urban centers in developing countries, the present need for elementary health care in urban slums raises the question of whether PHWs can also provide health assistance to the population there. This paper deals with the issue of whether PHWs in North East Brazil can improve health care delivery and the health situation of the poor population in rural and urban areas. The investigations covered both PHWs and the population. Questionnaire-guided interviews and participant observation were used as research tools. The conclusion is drawn that the PHW-program there has succeeded, if the PHWs have increased the coverage of the health service delivery and also the level of health-related knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in the population--although with significant differences between rural and urban areas (higher coverage and higher KAP in rural areas). The quality of training and supervision and the characteristics of the area and local framework were also found to influence the quality of the work (performance) of the PHWs.