An active electronic bidirectional interface for high resolution interrogation of the spinal cord.

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown promise as both a clinical therapeutic tool and research aid in the study of nervous system function. However, available clinical paddles are limited to using a small number of contacts due to the burden of wires necessary to connect each contact to the therapeutic device. Here, we introduce for the first time the integration of a hermetic active electronic multiplexer onto the electrode paddle array itself, removing this interconnect limitation. We evaluated the chronic implantation of an active electronic 60-contact paddle (the HD64) on the lumbosacral spinal cord of two sheep. The HD64 was implanted for 13 months and 15 months, with no device-related malfunctions or adverse events. We identified increased selectivity in EES-evoked motor responses using dense stimulating bipoles. Further, we found that dense recording bipoles decreased the spatial correlation between channels during recordings. Finally, spatial electrode encoding enabled a neural network to accurately perform EES parameter inference for unseen stimulation electrodes, reducing training data requirements. A high-density EES paddle, containing active electronics safely integrated into neural interfaces, opens new avenues for the study of nervous system function and new therapies to treat neural injury and dysfunction.

Improved Selectivity in Eliciting Evoked Electromyography Responses With High-Resolution Spinal Cord Stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offers a therapy for increasing numbers of patients with chronic pain and spinal cord injury, it becomes increasingly important to better understand its somatotopy. In this prospective study, we investigate whether high-resolution SCS (HR-SCS) offers improved selectivity assessed through elicitation of evoked electromyography (EMG) responses as compared with commercial paddle leads. METHODS: Vertical tripole configurations were used to elicit EMG responses in both types of paddles placed for standard-of-care indications between T6 and T10. In HR-SCS, evoked EMG responses in lower extremity/abdominal muscle groups were monitored at 6 to 8 mediolateral sites. All commercial paddle columns were tested. Percentage change in the maximum root mean square value was calculated at a group level. Heat maps were generated to identify responders for each muscle group. Responders were considered patients who had a >50% change in root mean square over baseline. RESULTS: We demonstrated significantly greater motor responses across medial and lateral contacts and greater responder rates consistently at the T6 and T9 levels with HR-SCS as compared with commercial paddles in 18 patients. Distal muscle groups (gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior) and proximal muscle groups (biceps femoris and quadriceps) were selectively activated at both levels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that HR-SCS has greater selectivity in eliciting evoked EMG responses in an intraoperative setting. HR-SCS offers recruitment of muscle groups at lateral contacts concurrently with medial contacts. We provide data that HR-SCS may provide higher spatial resolution, which has the potential to allow for personalization of care and treatment of pain syndromes/symptoms which to date have not been effectively treated.