Disparities in Indications and Outcomes Reporting for Spinal Column Shortening for Tethered Cord Syndrome: The Need for a Standardized Approach.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To identify commonly reported indications and outcomes in spinal column shortening (SCS) procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SCS is a surgical procedure used in patients with tethered cord syndrome (TCS)-characterized by abnormal attachment of neural components to surrounding tissues-to shorten the vertebral column, release tension on the spinal cord/neural elements, and alleviate associated symptoms. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE searches captured SCS literature published between 1950 and 2023. Prospective/retrospective cohort studies and case series were included without age limit or required follow-up period. Review articles without new patient presentations, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, conference abstracts, and letters were excluded. Studies included adult and pediatric patients. RESULTS: The 29 identified studies represented 278 patients (age 5-76 y). In 24.1% of studies, patients underwent primary TCS intervention via SCS. In 41.4% of studies, patients underwent SCS after failed previous primary detethering (24.1% of studies were mixed and 10.3% were unspecified). The most commonly reported non-genitourinary/bowel surgical indications were back pain (55.2%), lower-extremity pain (48.3%), lower-extremity weakness (48.3%), lower-extremity numbness (34.5%), and lower-extremity motor dysfunction (34.5%). Genitourinary/bowel symptoms were most often described as nonspecific bladder dysfunction (58.6%), bladder incontinence (34.5%), and bowel dysfunction (31.0%). After SCS, non-genitourinary/bowel outcomes included lower-extremity pain (44.8%), back pain (31.0%), and lower-extremity sensory and motor function (both 31.0%). Bladder dysfunction (79.3%), bowel dysfunction (34.5%), and bladder incontinence (13.8%) were commonly reported genitourinary/bowel outcomes. In total, 40 presenting surgical indication categories and 33 unique outcome measures were reported across studies. Seventeen of the 278 patients (6.1%) experienced a complication. CONCLUSION: The SCS surgical literature displays variability in operative indications and postoperative outcomes. The lack of common reporting mechanisms impedes higher-level analysis. A standardized outcomes measurement tool, encompassing both patient-reported outcome measures and objective metrics, is necessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Pre-op considerations in neuromuscular scoliosis deformity surgery: proceedings of the half day course at the 58th annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society.

Scoliosis is a common complication of neuromuscular disorders. These patients are frequently recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment. When treated surgically, they have the highest risk of complications of all forms of scoliosis. While recent studies have shown an improvement in the rate of complications, they still remain high ranging from 6.3 to 75% depending upon the underlying etiology and the treatment center (Mohamad et al. in J Pediatr Orthop 27:392-397, 2007; McElroy et al. in Spine, 2012; Toll et al. in J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:207-213, 2018; Cognetti et al. in Neurosurg Focus 43:E10, 2017). For those patients who are able to recover from the perioperative period without major complications, several recent studies have shown decreased long-term mortality and improved health-related quality of life in neuromuscular patients who have undergone spine fusion (Bohtz et al. in J Pediatr Orthop 31:668-673, 2011; Ahonen et al. in Neurology 101:e1787-e1792, 2023; Jain et al. in JBJS 98:1821-1828, 2016). It is critically important to optimize patients preoperatively to minimize the risk of post-operative complications and maximize long-term outcomes. In order to do so, one must familiarize themselves with the common complications and their treatment. The most common complications are pulmonary in nature. With reported rates as high as 23-29%, pre-operative optimization should be employed for these patients to minimize the risk of post-operative complications (Sharma et al. in Eur Spine J 22:1230-1249, 2013; Rumalla et al. in J Neurosurg Spine 25:500-508, 2016). The next most common cause of complications are implant related, with 13-23% of patients experiencing an implant-related complication that may require a second procedure (Toll et al. in J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:207-213, 2018; Sharma et al. in Eur Spine J 22:1230-1249, 2013) Therefore optimization of bone quality prior to surgical intervention is important to help minimize the risk of instrumentation failure. Optimization of muscle tone and spasticity may help to decrease the risk of instrumentation complications, but may also contribute to the progression of scoliosis. While only 3% of patients have neurologic complication, significant equipoise remains regarding whether or not patients should undergo prophylactic detethering procedures to minimize those risks (Sharma et al. in Eur Spine J 22:1230-1249, 2013). Although only 1.8% of complications are classified as cardiac related, they can be among the most devastating (Rumalla et al. in J Neurosurg Spine 25:500-508, 2016). Simply understanding the underlying etiology and the potential risks associated with each condition (i.e., conduction abnormalities in a patient with Rett syndrome or cardiomyopathies patients with muscular dystrophy) can be lifesaving. The following article is a summation of the half day course on neuromuscular scoliosis from the 58th annual SRS annual meeting, summarizing the recommendations from some of the world's experts on medical considerations in surgical treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis.

Timing of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) recovery and clinical recovery after termination of pediatric spinal deformity surgery due to loss of IONM signals.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to reduce the risk of spinal cord injury during pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Significant reduction and/or loss of IONM signals without immediate recovery may lead the surgeon to acutely abort the case. The timing of when monitorable signals return remains largely unknown. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the correlation between IONM signal loss, clinical examination, and subsequent normalization of IONM signals after aborted pediatric spinal deformity surgery to help determine when it is safe to return to the operating room. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a multicenter, multidisciplinary, retrospective study of pediatric patients (<18 years old) undergoing spinal deformity surgery whose surgery was aborted due to a significant reduction or loss of IONM potentials. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-six patients less than 18 years old who underwent spinal deformity surgery that was aborted due to IONM signal loss were enrolled into the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: IONM data, operative reports, and clinical examinations were investigated to determine the relationship between IONM loss, clinical examination, recovery of IONM signals, and clinical outcome. METHODS: Information regarding patient demographics, deformity type, clinical history, neurologic and ambulation status, operative details, IONM information (eg, quality of loss [SSEPs, MEPs], laterality, any recovery of signals, etc.), intraoperative wake-up test, postoperative neurologic exam, postoperative imaging, and time to return to the operating were all collected. All factors were analyzed and compared with univariate and multivariate analysis using appropriate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled with a median age of 13 years [IQR 11-14], and the most common sex was female (42/66, 63.6%). Most patients had idiopathic scoliosis (33/66, 50%). The most common causes of IONM loss were screw placement (27/66, 40.9%) followed by rod correction (19/66, 28.8%). All patients had either complete bilateral (39/66, 59.0%), partial bilateral (10/66, 15.2%) or unilateral (17/66, 25.8%) MEP loss leading to termination of the case. Overall, when patients were returned to the operating room 2 weeks postoperatively, nearly 75% (40/55) had monitorable IONM signals. Univariate analysis demonstrated that bilateral SSEP loss (p=.019), bilateral SSEP and MEP loss (p=.022) and delayed clinical neurologic recovery (p=.008) were significantly associated with having unmonitorable IONM signals at repeat surgery. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that delayed clinical neurologic recovery (> 72 hours) was significantly associated with unmonitorable IONM signals when returned to the operating room (p=.006). All patients ultimately made a full neurologic recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In children whose spinal deformity surgery was aborted due to intraoperative IONM loss, there was a strong correlation between combined intraoperative SSEP/MEP loss, the magnitude of IONM loss, the timing of clinical recovery, and the time of electrophysiological IONM recovery. The highest likelihood of having a prolonged postoperative neurological deficit and undetectable IONM signals upon return to the OR occurs with bilateral complete loss of SSEPs and MEPs.

The Sensitivity of Limited-Sequence MRI in Identifying Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury: A Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical clearance of a child's cervical spine after trauma is often challenging due to impaired mental status or an unreliable neurologic examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for excluding ligamentous injury in children but is constrained by long image acquisition times and frequent need for anesthesia. Limited-sequence MRI (LSMRI) is used in evaluating the evolution of traumatic brain injury and may also be useful for cervical spine clearance while potentially avoiding the need for anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and negative predictive value of LSMRI as compared to gold standard full-sequence MRI as a screening tool to rule out clinically significant ligamentous cervical spine injury. METHODS: We conducted a ten-center, five-year retrospective cohort study (2017-2021) of all children (0-18y) with a cervical spine MRI after blunt trauma. MRI images were re-reviewed by a study pediatric radiologist at each site to determine if the presence of an injury could be identified on limited sequences alone. Unstable cervical spine injury was determined by study neurosurgeon review at each site. RESULTS: We identified 2,663 children less than 18 years of age who underwent an MRI of the cervical spine with 1,008 injuries detected on full-sequence studies. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of LSMRI were both >99% for detecting any injury and 100% for detecting any unstable injury. Young children (age < 5 years) were more likely to be electively intubated or sedated for cervical spine MRI. CONCLUSION: LSMRI is reliably detects clinically significant ligamentous injury in children after blunt trauma. To decrease anesthesia use and minimize MRI time, trauma centers should develop LSMRI screening protocols for children without a reliable neurologic exam. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (Diagnostic Tests or Criteria).

Frequency and predictors of complication clustering within 30 days of spinal fusion surgery: a study of children with neuromuscular scoliosis.

PURPOSE: There is limited information on the clustering or co-occurrence of complications after spinal fusion surgery for neuromuscular disease in children. We aimed to identify the frequency and predictive factors of co-occurring perioperative complications in these children. METHODS: In this retrospective database cohort study, we identified children (ages 10-18 years) with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent elective spinal fusion in 2012-2020 from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. The rates of co-occurring complications within 30 days were calculated, and associated factors were identified by logistic regression analysis. Correlation between a number of complications and outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Approximately 11% (709/6677 children with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion had co-occurring complications: 7% experienced two complications and 4% experienced ≥ 3. The most common complication was bleeding/transfusion (80%), which most frequently co-occurred with pneumonia (24%) and reintubation (18%). Surgical time ≥ 400 min (odds ratio (OR) 1.49 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.75]), fusion ≥ 13 levels (1.42 [1.13-1.79]), and pelvic fixation (OR 1.21 [1.01, 1.44]) were identified as procedural factors that independently predicted concurrent complications. Clinical risk factors for co-occurring complications included an American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification ≥ 3 (1.73 [1.27-2.37]), structural pulmonary/airway abnormalities (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), impaired cognitive status (1.80 [1.41-2.30]), seizure disorder (1.36 [1.12-1.67]), hematologic disorder (1.40 [1.03-1.91], preoperative nutritional support (1.34 [1.08-1.72]), and congenital malformations (1.20 [1.01-1.44]). Preoperative tracheostomy was protective against concurrent complications (0.62 [0.43-0.89]). Significant correlations were found between number of complications and length of stay, non-home discharge, readmissions, and death. CONCLUSION: Longer surgical time (≥ 400 min), fusion ≥ 13 levels and pelvic fixation are surgical risk factors independently associated with co-occurring complications, which were associated with poorer patient outcomes. Recognizing identified nonmodifiable risk factors might also be important for preoperative planning and risk stratification of children with neuromuscular scoliosis requiring spinal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV evidence.

Morphological and ultrastructural investigation of the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane: Comparing children with Chiari malformation type I and controls.

INTRODUCTION: The fibrous posterior atlanto-occipital membrane (PAOM) at the craniocervical junction is typically removed during decompression surgery for Chiari malformation type I (CM-I); however, its importance and ultrastructural architecture have not been investigated in children. We hypothesized that there are structural differences in the PAOM of patients with CM-I and those without. METHODS: In this prospective study, blinded pathological analysis was performed on PAOM specimens from children who had surgery for CM-I and children who had surgery for posterior fossa tumors (controls). Clinical and radiographic data were collected. Statistical analysis included comparisons between the CM-I and control cohorts and correlations with imaging measures. RESULTS: A total of 35 children (mean age at surgery 10.7 years; 94.3% white) with viable specimens for evaluation were enrolled: 24 with CM-I and 11 controls. There were no statistical demographic differences between the two cohorts. Four children had a family history of CM-I and five had a syndromic condition. The cohorts had similar measurements of tonsillar descent, syringomyelia, basion to C2, and condylar-to-C2 vertical axis (all p>0.05). The clival-axial angle was lower in patients with CM-I (138.1 vs. 149.3 degrees, p = 0.016). Morphologically, the PAOM demonstrated statistically higher proportions of disorganized architecture in patients with CM-I (75.0% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.012). There were no differences in PAOM fat, elastin, or collagen percentages overall and no differences in imaging or ultrastructural findings between male and female patients. Posterior fossa volume was lower in children with CM-I (163,234 mm3 vs. 218,305 mm3, p<0.001), a difference that persisted after normalizing for patient height (129.9 vs. 160.9, p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CM-I, the PAOM demonstrates disorganized architecture compared with that of control patients. This likely represents an anatomic adaptation in the presence of CM-I rather than a pathologic contribution.

Disparities in indications and outcomes reporting for pediatric tethered cord surgery: The need for a standardized outcome assessment tool.

PURPOSE: Tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is characterized by abnormal attachment of the spinal cord neural elements to surrounding tissues. The most common symptoms include pain, motor or sensory dysfunction, and urologic deficits. Although TCS is common in children, there is a significant heterogeneity in outcomes reporting. We systematically reviewed surgical indications and postoperative outcomes to assess the need for a grading/classification system. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE searches identified pediatric TCS literature published between 1950 and 2023. Studies reporting surgical interventions, ≥ 6-month follow-up, and ≥ 5 patients were included. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies representing 3798 patients were included. The most commonly reported non-urologic symptoms were nonspecific lower-extremity motor disturbances (36.4% of studies), lower-extremity/back pain (32.7%), nonspecific lower-extremity sensory disturbances (29.1%), gait abnormalities (29.1%), and nonspecific bowel dysfunction/fecal incontinence (25.5%). Urologic symptoms were most commonly reported as nonspecific complaints (40.0%). After detethering surgery, retethering was the most widely reported non-urologic outcome (40.0%), followed by other nonspecific findings: motor deficits (32.7%), lower-extremity/back/perianal pain (18.2%), gait/ambulation function (18.2%), sensory deficits (12.7%), and bowel deficits/fecal incontinence (12.7%). Commonly reported urologic outcomes included nonspecific bladder/urinary deficits (27.3%), bladder capacity (20.0%), bladder compliance (18.2%), urinary incontinence/enuresis/neurogenic bladder (18.2%), and nonspecific urodynamics/urodynamics score change (16.4%). CONCLUSION: TCS surgical literature is highly variable regarding surgical indications and reporting of postsurgical outcomes. The lack of common data elements and consistent quantitative measures inhibits higher-level analysis. The development and validation of a standardized outcomes measurement tool-ideally encompassing both patient-reported outcome and objective measures-would significantly benefit future TCS research and surgical management.

Pediatric cervical spine clearance: A 10-year evaluation of multidetector computed tomography at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.

INTRODUCTION: Efficient and accurate evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine (c-spine) for both injury identification and posttraumatic clearance remains a challenge. We aimed to determine the sensitivity of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for identification of cervical spine injuries (CSIs) in pediatric blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2012 to 2021. All pediatric trauma patients age younger than 18 years who underwent c-spine imaging (plain radiograph, MDCT, and/or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were included. All patients with abnormal MRIs but normal MDCTs were reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon to assess specific injury characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 4,477 patients underwent c-spine imaging, and 60 (1.3%) were diagnosed with a clinically significant CSI that required surgery or a halo. These patients were older, more likely to be intubated, have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of <14, and more likely to be transferred in from a referring hospital. One patient with a fracture on radiography and neurologic symptoms got an MRI and no MDCT before operative repair. All other patients who underwent surgery including halo placement for a clinically significant CSI had their injury diagnosed by MDCT, representing a sensitivity of 100%. There were 17 patients with abnormal MRIs and normal MDCTs; none underwent surgery or halo placement. Imaging from these patients was reviewed by a pediatric spine surgeon, and no unstable injuries were identified. CONCLUSION: Multidetector computed tomography appears to have 100% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant CSIs in pediatric trauma patients, regardless of age or mental status. Forthcoming prospective data will be useful to confirm these results and inform recommendations for whether pediatric c-spine clearance can be safely performed based on the results of a normal MDCT alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

Hanging and Strangulation Injuries: An Institutional Review From a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the incidence and outcomes of pediatric hanging and strangulation injuries to inform best practices for trauma triage and management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted that included all patients who presented after hanging or strangulation to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center from 2011 through 2021. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. All imaging modalities of the head and neck were reviewed to determine if a bony fracture or vascular injury was present. RESULTS: Over the 11-year study period, 128 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age of the cohort was 13 years [IQR: 8.5-15], most patients were male (60.9%), and the median GCS was 11 [3, 15]. There were 96 cases (75%) that were intentional injuries. 76 patients (59.4%) received imaging in the form of plain radiographs, CT, or MRI of the neck and cervical spine. No fractures were identified and there were 0 clinically significant cervical spine injuries. CT angiograms of the neck identified no cerebral vascular injuries. Mortality was high (32%), and 25% of patients with nonaccidental injuries had a documented prior suicide attempt. CONCLUSION: We identified no cervical spine fractures and no blunt cerebral vascular injuries after a hanging or strangulation in over 10 years at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. Use of CT and CT angiography of the neck and cervical spine should be minimized in this patient population without high clinical index of suspicion and/or significant mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Younger age at spinal cord detethering is potentially associated with a reduced risk of curve progression in children with early onset scoliosis.

PURPOSE: In children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who have tethered spinal cord (TSC), spinal cord detethering is commonly performed prior to spinal deformity correction (SDC). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether age or curve magnitude at the time of detethering is associated with curve progression at a follow-up of at least 2 years. It was hypothesized that patients who undergo detethering at a younger age, or those with a smaller curve magnitude, would experience a reduced rate of curve progression when compared with those who are older or with larger curves. METHODS: Patients with EOS who underwent detethering at least 2 years prior to SDC were identified in a multicenter international registry. Radiographs were assessed just prior to the detethering procedure (pre-detether) and at the most recent visit prior to SDC (most recent post-detether). The rate of curve progression > 10° was examined. Owing to unequal follow-up in individual patients, Cox regression was used to investigate associations between primary variables (age and magnitude of major coronal curve) and rate of curve progression. RESULTS: 37 patients met inclusion criteria and 18 (mean age: 3.7 ± 2.9 years, 66.7% female, mean follow-up: 3.4 ± 1.3 years) had radiographic data available for analysis. Pre-detether and most recent post-detether major coronal curves were 44.8° ± 18.5° and 47.6° ± 23.9°, respectively. 5 (27.8%) patients had curve progression > 10° at a follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.2 years. Patients with progression > 10° were older at the time of detethering when compared with those without (5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 3 ± 2.7 years, p = 0.084). Regression analysis demonstrated that as age at detethering increased by 1 year, the rate of curve progression > 10° increased by 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.899; 1.839, p = 0.169]. There was no evidence of an association between pre-detethering curve magnitude and rate of curve progression > 10° [HR: 1.027, 95% CI 0.977; 1.079, p = 0.297]. CONCLUSION: In a small multicenter cohort of EOS patients with TSC, younger age, but not curve size, at the time of detethering was associated with a lower rate of scoliosis progression. Although these results indicate a potential role for early spinal cord detethering in the EOS population, they require further prospective investigation with a larger number of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection in pediatric patients: Otolaryngologic considerations to airway management, endoscopic exposure, and complication management.

BACKGROUND: Anterior brainstem compression from odontoid pathology can occur in patients with craniocervical disorders. Occasionally, odontoid resection is required. In adults, odontoid resection has evolved toward transnasal-only endoscopic techniques. Pediatric patients, however, pose special challenges due to abnormal anatomy and smaller working spaces. A combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection (TN/TO EOR) can overcome this limitation. We present a case series with emphasis on otolaryngologic considerations to airway management, endoscopic approach, and management of complications. METHODS: A single center, retrospective review of patients aged ≤18 undergoing combined transnasal/transoral endoscopic odontoid resection between 2011 and 2022 is presented. Clinical and surgical variables consisting of diagnosis, intubation approach, other airway procedures performed, symptoms, complications, blood loss, and time to extubation, return to oral feeding, and discharge were recorded. RESULTS: 19 patients aged 10.7 ± 4.3 (range: 3-18) were included. Diagnoses included congenital syndrome (n = 6), complex Chiari malformation (n = 11), and congenital syndrome with Chiari (n = 2). Patients commonly required indirect videolaryngoscopy for intubation, with or without fiberoptic endoscopic assistance. Seven underwent adenoidectomy, two underwent adenotonsillectomy, and one required adenoidectomy with midline palatal split and inferior turbinate outfracture. Four patients had undergone prior adenotonsillectomy. Presenting symptoms included extremity weakness (n = 9), dysphagia (n = 8), velopharyngeal insufficiency (n = 4), sleep disturbance (n = 5), and headaches (n = 8). Four patients had complications, including one re-operation for residual odontoid, one flap dehiscence, one cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repaired primarily, and one complicated course including temporary spinal cord injury. Blood loss was 50 ± 43 cc (median 30). Time to extubation was 1.1 ± 2.1 days (median 0; one patient underwent tracheotomy for respiratory failure), time to oral intake was 2.9 ± 3.7 days (median 1), and time to discharge was 7.1 ± 7.5 days (median 4). CONCLUSIONS: A combined transnasal/transoral approach can be successfully used in pediatric patients to overcome difficult endoscopic access. Although complications exist, early extubation and return to oral intake occurs in the vast majority of cases. For pediatric TN/TO EOR, the otolaryngologist plays a key role in preoperative assessment, airway management, endoscopic exposure, and complication management.

Development of consensus-based best practice guidelines for response to intraoperative neuromonitoring events in high-risk spinal deformity surgery.

PURPOSE: To expand on previously described intraoperative aids by developing consensus-based best practice guidelines to optimize the approach to intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) events associated with "high-risk" spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Consensus was established among a group of experienced spinal deformity surgeons by way of the Delphi method. Through a series of iterative surveys and a final virtual consensus meeting, participants expressed their agreement (strongly agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree) with various items. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement ("strongly agree" or "agree"). Near-consensus was defined as ≥ 60% but < 80%. Equipoise was ≥ 20% but < 60%, and consensus to exclude was < 20%. RESULTS: 15 out of 15 (100%) invited surgeons agreed to participate. Final consensus supported inclusion of 105 items (53 in Response Algorithm, 13 in Ongoing Consideration of Etiology, 31 in Real-Time Data Scenarios, 8 in Patterns of IONM Loss), which were organized into a final set of best practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: Detailed consensus-based best practice guidelines and aids were successfully created with the intention to help organize and direct the surgical team in exploring and responding to neurological complications during high-risk spinal deformity surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: This current systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all current research-based spine surgery applications of AI/ML in optimizing preoperative patient selection, as well as predicting and managing postoperative outcomes and complications. METHODS: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 41 studies were included in this review. Bayesian networks had the highest average AUC (.80), and neural networks had the best accuracy (83.0%), sensitivity (81.5%), and specificity (71.8%). Preoperative planning/cost prediction models (.89,82.2%) and discharge/length of stay models (.80,78.0%) each reported significantly higher average AUC and accuracy compared to readmissions/reoperation prediction models (.67,70.2%) (P < .001, P = .005, respectively). Model performance also significantly varied across postoperative management applications for average AUC and accuracy values (P < .001, P < .027, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Generally, authors of the reviewed studies concluded that AI/ML offers a potentially beneficial tool for providers to optimize patient care and improve cost-efficiency. More specifically, AI/ML models performed best, on average, when optimizing preoperative patient selection and planning and predicting costs, hospital discharge, and length of stay. However, models were not as accurate in predicting postoperative complications, adverse events, and readmissions and reoperations. An understanding of AI/ML-based applications is becoming increasingly important, particularly in spine surgery, as the volume of reported literature, technology accessibility, and clinical applications continue to rapidly expand.

Establishing consensus: determinants of high-risk and preventative strategies for neurological events in complex spinal deformity surgery.

PURPOSE: To establish expert consensus on various parameters that constitute elevated risk during spinal deformity surgery and potential preventative strategies that may minimize the risk of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) events and postoperative neurological deficits. METHODS: Through a series of surveys and a final virtual consensus meeting, the Delphi method was utilized to establish consensus among a group of expert spinal deformity surgeons. During iterative rounds of voting, participants were asked to express their agreement (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree) to include items in a final set of guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% agreement among participants. Near-consensus was ≥ 60% but < 80% agreement, equipoise was ≥ 20% but < 60%, and consensus to exclude was < 20%. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 15 (100%) invited expert spinal deformity surgeons agreed to participate. There was consensus to include 22 determinants of high-risk (8 patient factors, 8 curve and spinal cord factors, and 6 surgical factors) and 21 preventative strategies (4 preoperative, 14 intraoperative, and 3 postoperative) in the final set of best practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: A resource highlighting several salient clinical factors found in high-risk spinal deformity patients as well as strategies to prevent neurological events was successfully created through expert consensus. This is intended to serve as a reference for surgeons and other clinicians involved in the care of spinal deformity patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Distal adding-on in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in diminished health-related quality of life at 10 years following posterior spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between the various definitions of adding-on identified in the literature and HRQoL at 10 years following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to identify a clinically relevant definition. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with Lenke type 1 or 2 AIS with 10-year follow-up after PSF were identified in a multicenter registry. Adding-on was identified independently using 5 published definitions and expert spine surgeons' visual confirmation. Worsening of HRQoL was defined as a preoperative to 10-year postoperative decrease in SRS-22 domain score ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included, and 118 had HRQoL data available for the main analysis. Worsening pain was noted in 49 (41.5%) patients, appearance in 1 (0.8%), and activity in 70 (59.3%) from preoperative to postoperative. 4 of the 5 definitions of adding-on demonstrated no evidence of association with worsening HRQoL. By Cho's definition (either 1. ≥ 5° increase in Cobb angle AND increase in number of vertebrae in curve distally, or 2. ≥ 5° increase in angulation of 1st disc below LIV), adding-on (27 patients, 22.9%) was associated with an increased risk of worsening pain (59.3% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.033) and activity (77.8% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.026). There was no evidence of association with changes in appearance. Risk of worsening pain and activity was increased by 1.75 and 1.51 times (p = 0.023 and p = 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: Cho's definition of adding-on was associated with worsening HRQoL at 10 years following PSF for Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS. Consistent use of this definition will allow us to compare studies and obtain meaningful information in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Neurosurgical Considerations of Neurocutaneous Syndromes.

The phakomatoses are a group of genetic and acquired disorders characterized by neurologic, cutaneous, and often ocular manifestations, thus commonly referred to as neurocutaneous syndromes. In several of these conditions the underlying genetic pathophysiology has been elucidated, which will continue to play an important role in advancing therapeutic techniques. This article focuses on several examples of such neurocutaneous syndromes, with special attention to the relevant neurosurgical considerations of these patients.

Endoscope-assisted microsurgical retrosigmoid approach to the lateral posterior fossa: Cadaveric model and a review of literature.

BACKGROUND: The advancement of endoscopic techniques in the past decade has improved the surgical management of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. Endoscope-assisted microsurgery improves the ability to evaluate the extent of resection, achieve safe tumor resection and reduce the risk of surgery-related morbidity. METHODS: In this study, we used a cadaveric model to demonstrate a step by step endoscope-assisted microsurgery of the retrosigmoid approach to the lateral posterior fossa. RESULTS: Retrosigmoid craniotomies were performed on four latex-injected cadaver heads (eight CPAs). Microsurgical exposures were performed to identify neurovascular structures in each segment. 0° and 30° rigid endoscope lenses were subsequently introduced into each corridor and views were compared in this manner. The endoscopic images were compared with the standard microscopic views to determine the degree of visualization with each technique. In each case, better visualization was provided by both the 0° and 30° endoscope lenses. Endoscopic views frequently clarified neurovascular relationships in obscured anatomic regions. CONCLUSION: Endoscope-assisted microsurgery could allow better visualization of various regions of the posterior fossa. Surgical planning for posterior fossa lesions should include consideration of this combined approach.

Real-time navigation guidance with intraoperative CT imaging for pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head-mounted display: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of instrumentation placement in spinal fusion surgery, increasing patient safety and outcomes, optimizing ergonomics in the surgical suite, and ultimately lowering procedural costs. The authors sought to describe the use of a commercial prototype Spine AR platform (SpineAR) that provides a commercial AR head-mounted display (ARHMD) user interface for navigation-guided spine surgery incorporating real-time navigation images from intraoperative imaging with a 3D-reconstructed model in the surgeon's field of view, and to assess screw placement accuracy via this method. METHODS: Pedicle screw placement accuracy was assessed and compared with literature-reported data of the freehand (FH) technique. Accuracy with SpineAR was also compared between participants of varying spine surgical experience. Eleven operators without prior experience with AR-assisted pedicle screw placement took part in the study: 5 attending neurosurgeons and 6 trainees (1 neurosurgical fellow, 1 senior orthopedic resident, 3 neurosurgical residents, and 1 medical student). Commercially available 3D-printed lumbar spine models were utilized as surrogates of human anatomy. Among the operators, a total of 192 screws were instrumented bilaterally from L2-5 using SpineAR in 24 lumbar spine models. All but one trainee also inserted 8 screws using the FH method. In addition to accuracy scoring using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading scale, axial trajectory was assessed, and user feedback on experience with SpineAR was collected. RESULTS: Based on the Gertzbein-Robbins grading scale, the overall screw placement accuracy using SpineAR among all users was 98.4% (192 screws). Accuracy for attendings and trainees was 99.1% (112 screws) and 97.5% (80 screws), respectively. Accuracy rates were higher compared with literature-reported lumbar screw placement accuracy using FH for attendings (99.1% vs 94.32%; p = 0.0212) and all users (98.4% vs 94.32%; p = 0.0099). The percentage of total inserted screws with a minimum of 5° medial angulation was 100%. No differences were observed between attendings and trainees or between the two methods. User feedback on SpineAR was generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Screw placement was feasible and accurate using SpineAR, an ARHMD platform with real-time navigation guidance that provided a favorable surgeon-user experience.

A multicenter validation of the condylar-C2 sagittal vertical alignment in Chiari malformation type I: a study using the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: The condylar-C2 sagittal vertical alignment (C-C2SVA) describes the relationship between the occipitoatlantal joint and C2 in patients with Chiari malformation type I (CM-I). It has been suggested that a C-C2SVA ≥ 5 mm is predictive of the need for occipitocervical fusion (OCF) or ventral brainstem decompression (VBD). The authors' objective was to validate the predictive utility of the C-C2SVA by using a large, multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS: This validation study used a cohort of patients derived from the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium; patients < 21 years old with CM-I and syringomyelia treated from June 2011 to May 2016 were identified. The primary outcome was the need for OCF and/or VBD. After patients who required OCF and/or VBD were identified, 10 age- and sex-matched controls served as comparisons for each OCF/VBD patient. The C-C2SVA (defined as the position of a plumb line from the midpoint of the O-C1 joint relative to the posterior aspect of the C2-3 disc space), pBC2 (a line perpendicular to a line from the basion to the posteroinferior aspect of the C2 body), and clival-axial angle (CXA) were measured on sagittal MRI. The secondary outcome was the need for ≥ 2 CM-related operations. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients identified, 20 underwent OCF/VBD and 14 underwent repeat posterior fossa decompression. A C-C2SVA ≥ 5 mm was 100% sensitive and 86% specific for requiring OCF/VBD, with a 12.6% misclassification rate, whereas CXA < 125° was 55% sensitive and 99% specific, and pBC2 ≥ 9 was 20% sensitive and 88% specific. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that there was a significantly shorter time to second decompression in children with C-C2SVA ≥ 5 mm (p = 0.0039). The mean C-C2SVA was greater (6.13 ± 1.28 vs 3.13 ± 1.95 mm, p < 0.0001), CXA was lower (126° ± 15.4° vs 145° ± 10.7°, p < 0.05), and pBC2 was similar (7.65 ± 1.79 vs 7.02 ± 1.26 mm, p = 0.31) among those who underwent OCF/VBD versus decompression only. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the continuous measurement of C-C2SVA was 0.52; the kappa value was 0.47 for the binary categorization of C-C2SVA ≥ 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These results validated the C-C2SVA using a large, multicenter, external cohort with 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and a 12.6% misclassification rate. A C-C2SVA ≥ 5 mm is highly predictive of the need for OCF/VBD in patients with CM-I. The authors recommend that this measurement be considered among the tools to identify the "high-risk" CM-I phenotype.

Endoscopic transnasal/transoral odontoid resection in children: results of a combined neurosurgical and otolaryngological protocolized, institutional approach.

OBJECTIVE: Odontogenic ventral brainstem compression can be a source of significant morbidity in patients with craniocervical disease. The most common methods for odontoidectomy are the transoral and endoscopic endonasal routes. In this study, the authors investigated the use of an institutional protocol for endoscopic transnasal/transoral odontoidectomy in the pediatric population. METHODS: From 2007 to 2017, a multidisciplinary institutional protocol was developed and refined for the evaluation and treatment of pediatric patients requiring odontoidectomy. Preoperative assessment included airway evaluation, a sleep study (if indicated), discussion of possible tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy, and thorough imaging review by the neurosurgery and otolaryngology teams. Further preoperative anesthesia consultation was obtained for difficult airways. Intraoperatively, adenoidectomy was performed at the discretion of otolaryngology. The odontoidectomy was performed as a combined procedure. Primary posterior pharyngeal closure was performed by the otolaryngologist. The postoperative protocol called for immediate extubation, advancement to a soft diet at 24 hours, and no postoperative antibiotics. Outcome variables included time to extubation, operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients underwent combined endoscopic transoral/transnasal odontoid resection with at least 3 years of follow-up. All patients had stable to improved neurological function in the postoperative setting. All patients were extubated immediately after the procedure. The average operative length was 201 ± 46 minutes, and the average estimated blood loss was 44.6 ± 40.0 ml. Nine of 13 patients underwent simultaneous tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. The average hospital length of stay was 6.6 ± 5 days. The first patient in the series required revision surgery for removal of a small residual odontoid. One patient experienced pharyngeal flap dehiscence requiring revision. CONCLUSIONS: A protocolized, institutional approach for endoscopic transoral/transnasal odontoidectomy is described. The use of a combined, multidisciplinary approach leads to streamlined patient management and favorable outcomes in this complex patient population.