Occlusal Instability Results in Increased Complication Rates After Treatment of Mandibular Fractures.

PURPOSE: It is important to understand the factors that can increase the incidence of complications after mandibular fracture (MF) treatment. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether occlusal stability influences the occurrence of postoperative complications in MFs treated with internal rigid fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of patients treated for MF by osteosynthesis with plate and screw fixation. The primary predictor variable was the occlusal stability (yes vs no). Occlusion was scored as stable (group 1) if the patients had all their teeth and no free ends in either dental arch. Occlusion was coded as unstable (group 2) if the patients were partially edentulous with free ends in either dental arch or had edentulism involving more than 6 dental elements. The primary outcome variable was postoperative complication (yes vs no). The secondary outcome variables were the osteosynthesis system used (2.0 or 2.4 mm), local factors, age, and gender. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2 statistical test at 5% significance. RESULTS: Of 115 patients with 121 MFs, 73 (63.48%) had stable occlusion (group 1) and 42 (36.52%) had unstable occlusion (group 2). The mean age was 34.11 years, and 71.3% were men. The postoperative complication rate was 8.70% (10 patients). Of the 10 patients with complications, 3 (2.6%) were in group 1 and 7 (6.1%) were in group 2 (P = .021 and P < .05, respectively). The 2.0-mm system was used in 107 cases (93%). All the complications were associated with use of the 2.0-mm osteosynthesis plates, occurring in 3 of 69 patients in group 1 (4.34%) and 7 of 38 patients in group 2 (18.42%; P = .032 and P < .05, respectively). The greatest number of complications was associated with unilateral MF (9 of 109). The occurrence of postoperative complications in angle and symphysis/parasymphysis fracture sites was equal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that unstable occlusion could increase the rate of postoperative complications in MFs treated with plates and screws. Future studies are required with occlusal stability included as a variable.

Cirugía de elevación del seno asociada con pseudoquiste antral y mucocele / Sinus lifting surgery associated with antral pseudocyst and mucocele

Introducción: pseudoquistes y quistes verdaderos de los maxilares son contraindicaciones para cirugías de aumento de volumen óseo en la región posterior de la maxila. Objetivo: describir dos casos de pacientes con transtornos en los senos maxilares (pseudoquiste y quiste verdadero del maxilar) en senos maxilares neumatizados que necesitaban reconstrucción ósea, para posterior rehabilitacion con implantes oseointegrados. Presentación de casos: se presentan dos casos clínicos en que la planificación quirúrgica consistió en la remoción de la lesión y simultánea elevación del suelo del seno maxilar. En el primer caso, pseudoquiste antral, se procedió a la aspiración del contenido quístico previamente a la elevación de la membrana de Schneider. En el segundo caso, quiste verdadero del seno maxilar, se realizó la remoción completa de la lesión quística. En ambos casos no hubo perforación de la membrana, y el hueso bovino inorgánico fue utilizado como material de relleno. La instalación de los implantes fueron después de 7 meses de la cirugía de elevación de seno. Los controles clínicos y tomográficos mostraron adecuada oseointegración de los implantes y ausencia de recidiva y/o restos de la lesión. Conclusiones: el quiste verdadero del seno maxilar causa la destrucción de las paredes óseas y debe ser removido previamente a las cirugías de elevación sinusal. Ningún tratamiento es indicado para el pseudoquiste antral, teniendo claro que la lesión no representa necesariamente una contraindicación para la elevación de la membrana sinusal y colocación de injerto óseo para implantes. Mientras tanto, la aspiración previa de contenido líquido del pseudoquiste evita posibles complicaciones infecciosas posoperatorias(AU)

Introduction: maxillary pseudocysts and true cysts are contraindications for bone volume augmentation surgery in the posterior maxillary region. Objective: describe two cases of patients with maxillary sinus disorders (pseudocyst and true cyst) in pneumatized maxillary sinuses requiring bone reconstruction with a view to eventual rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants. Case presentation: two clinical cases are presented in which surgical planning consisted in lesion removal and simultaneous maxillary sinus floor elevation. In the first case, antral pseudocyst, aspiration was performed of the cystic content before elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. In the second case, true cyst of the maxillary sinus, total removal of the cystic lesion was performed. Membrane perforation did not occur in either case. Inorganic bovine bone was used as filler in both. Implantation was performed 7 months after sinus lifting surgery. Clinical and tomographic examination showed adequate implant osseointegration and absence of recurrence and/or lesion remnants. Conclusions: true maxillary sinus cysts cause bone wall destruction, and should be removed before performing sinus lifting surgery. No treatment is indicated for antral pseudocyst, for the lesion does not necessarily constitute a contraindication for sinus membrane lifting and bone graft placement for implantation. On the other hand, previous aspiration of the liquid content of the pseudocyst prevents possible postoperative infectious complications(AU)

Cirugía de elevación del seno asociada con pseudoquiste antral y mucocele / Sinus lifting surgery associated with antral pseudocyst and mucocele

Introducción: pseudoquistes y quistes verdaderos de los maxilares son contraindicaciones para cirugías de aumento de volumen óseo en la región posterior de la maxila. Objetivo: describir dos casos de pacientes con transtornos en los senos maxilares (pseudoquiste y quiste verdadero del maxilar) en senos maxilares neumatizados que necesitaban reconstrucción ósea, para posterior rehabilitacion con implantes oseointegrados. Presentación de casos: se presentan dos casos clínicos en que la planificación quirúrgica consistió en la remoción de la lesión y simultánea elevación del suelo del seno maxilar. En el primer caso, pseudoquiste antral, se procedió a la aspiración del contenido quístico previamente a la elevación de la membrana de Schneider. En el segundo caso, quiste verdadero del seno maxilar, se realizó la remoción completa de la lesión quística. En ambos casos no hubo perforación de la membrana, y el hueso bovino inorgánico fue utilizado como material de relleno. La instalación de los implantes fueron después de 7 meses de la cirugía de elevación de seno. Los controles clínicos y tomográficos mostraron adecuada oseointegración de los implantes y ausencia de recidiva y/o restos de la lesión. Conclusiones: el quiste verdadero del seno maxilar causa la destrucción de las paredes óseas y debe ser removido previamente a las cirugías de elevación sinusal. Ningún tratamiento es indicado para el pseudoquiste antral, teniendo claro que la lesión no representa necesariamente una contraindicación para la elevación de la membrana sinusal y colocación de injerto óseo para implantes. Mientras tanto, la aspiración previa de contenido líquido del pseudoquiste evita posibles complicaciones infecciosas posoperatorias(AU)

Introduction: maxillary pseudocysts and true cysts are contraindications for bone volume augmentation surgery in the posterior maxillary region. Objective: describe two cases of patients with maxillary sinus disorders (pseudocyst and true cyst) in pneumatized maxillary sinuses requiring bone reconstruction with a view to eventual rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants. Case presentation: two clinical cases are presented in which surgical planning consisted in lesion removal and simultaneous maxillary sinus floor elevation. In the first case, antral pseudocyst, aspiration was performed of the cystic content before elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. In the second case, true cyst of the maxillary sinus, total removal of the cystic lesion was performed. Membrane perforation did not occur in either case. Inorganic bovine bone was used as filler in both. Implantation was performed 7 months after sinus lifting surgery. Clinical and tomographic examination showed adequate implant osseointegration and absence of recurrence and/or lesion remnants. Conclusions: true maxillary sinus cysts cause bone wall destruction, and should be removed before performing sinus lifting surgery. No treatment is indicated for antral pseudocyst, for the lesion does not necessarily constitute a contraindication for sinus membrane lifting and bone graft placement for implantation. On the other hand, previous aspiration of the liquid content of the pseudocyst prevents possible postoperative infectious complications(AU)