[Bone protection in corticosteroid treated patients]. / Indagine sulla terapia di prevenzione del danno osseo nei pazienti trattati con corticosteroidi in Piemonte e valle d'Aosta.

The Piedmont Group of Clinical Nephrology compared the activity of 15 nephrology centers in Piedmont and Aosta Valley as regards bone protection in patients on corticosteroids therapy. Fracture prevalence shows great variability: in 4/15 centers (27%) no fractures were found, in 6/15 centers (40%) fractures were present in 1-4% of cases, in 1 center in 18% of patients. Clinical risk of fracture was based on sex, age and postmenopausal status in 11/14 of the centers (79%), history of fractures and bone disease in 4/14 centers (27%), smoking and alcohol consumption in 3 and 2 centers respectively, glucocorticoid dose and duration in 4, in children bone age and calcium phosphorus status. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed in 12 centers based on risk factors, in 8 (57%) DXA was performed during the follow-up, in 4 it was performed after 12 months and in 2 after 2-3 years. DXA is not prescribed in children. Only in one center, risk assessment is based on FRAX. Most of the patients are treated with vitamin D supplementation at a dose of steroids of 5 mg/d (80%). Calcium carbonate is used in 9 centers (60%), in two it is used only in the presence of low ionized calcium or bone mineral density. Bisphosphonates are used following AIFA prescription, in particular alendronate in all centers, risedronate in seven and denosumab in one. The analysis shows the great variability of the clinical and therapeutic approach regarding bone protection in patients on corticosteroids therapy, in Piedmont and Aosta Valley.

[What if it is not an acute pyelonephritis? A monocentric experience of renal infarcts]. / Quando non è una pielonefrite acuta: esperienza monocentrica di infarti renali.

BACKGROUND: Often the reduced contrast enhancement on CT renal imaging is radiologically interpreted as acute pyelonephritis (PNA), but it is the task of the clinician to assess a possible differential diagnosis such as a renal infarct and look for a cause. METHODS: In our experience (2010-2013), we hospitalized 51 patients with radiological imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis in native kidneys. However, three of these cases result, after a second look, to be ischemic lesions, only sometimes complicated by over-infections (Tabella 1). FIRST CASE: a woman hospitalized for fever and flank pain with blood culture positive for Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Antibiotic therapy allowed a clinical-laboratory improvement, but after 45 days persisted a focal wedge to the CT scan. The labs showed a anemia due to a sickle cell disease (SLC). The overview was finally interpreted as a renal infarct secondary to a sickle cell anemia, initially complicated by over-infection. SECOND CASE: a men hospitalized for a acute flank pain. The CT scan showed a left renal infarct and a partial renal artery thrombosis, resulting in abuse of cannabinoids and LAC positivity.Third case: a woman hospitalized for flank pain and slight movement of inflammatory markers. CT showed a cuneiform area in the right kidney not vascularized, that did not resolved after prolonged antibiotic therapy. The labs evidence a heterozygous mutation of prothrombin and MTHFR causing the renal infarction. CONCLUSIONS: 6% of radiographic imaging consistent with acute pyelonephritis concealed an underlying infarct, due to a unknown state of thrombophilia. The presence of hypovascular imaging to the TC scan, therefore, requires a differential diagnosis between PNA and infarct, especially in the case of atypical development.

Calcium-sensing-related gene mutations in hypercalcaemic hypocalciuric patients as differential diagnosis from primary hyperparathyroidism: detection of two novel inactivating mutations in an Italian population.

BACKGROUND: Inactivating mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), of the G-protein subunit α11 (GNA11) and of the adaptor-related protein complex 2, sigma 1 subunit (AP2S1) genes are responsible for familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH). The aim of this study was to analyse prevalence and pathogenicity of CaSR, GNA11 and AP2S1 mutations in patients with an FHH phenotype and to compare them with a sample of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in order to identify the most useful laboratory parameter for a differential diagnosis. METHODS: Patients with an FHH phenotype were studied with polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing of the entire CaSR, GNA11 and AP2S1 coding sequences. Novel mutations were introduced in a Myc-tagged human wild-type (WT) CaSR cDNA-expressing vector, and functional assay was performed on human embryonic kidney cells evaluating expression and function of mutated proteins. RESULTS: Among 16 FHH patients, none had an inactivating GNA11 or AP2S1 mutation while 3 (18.8%) carried a CaSR mutation and 10 (62.5%) at least one CaSR polymorphism. Within the latter group, 7 of 10 patients had more than one polymorphism (4.1 ± 2.1 per patient). Two novel CaSR mutations [c.2120A>T (E707V) and c.2320G>A (G774S)] were identified: the E707V mutation prevented CaSR expression (western blot), whereas the G774S mutation determined a reduced receptor sensitivity to calcium (IP3 assay). PHPT patients showed significantly (P < 0.001) higher serum calcium, parathyroid hormone, urinary calcium and calcium-creatinine clearance ratio (CCCR) and significantly lower serum phosphate than FHH ones. CONCLUSIONS: FHH should be clearly differentiated by PHPT to avoid unnecessary surgery: CCCR could be a useful screening tool while genetic analysis should include the two novel CaSR mutations herein described. The role of multiple polymorphisms deserves further investigation in patients with an FHH phenotype.

Unexpectedly high prevalence of rare genetic disorders in kidney transplant recipients with an unknown causal nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a rare genetic disease may receive renal transplantation (KTx) without a correct diagnosis of causal nephropathy and therefore develop unexpected and even severe complications. The aim of the study was to describe the cases of rare genetic disorders diagnosed after KTx, in order to draw clinical lessons for the transplant physician. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all patients who had received a diagnosis of a rare genetic disorder after KTx. RESULTS: In our center, more than 30% (278/911) of kidney transplant (KTx) recipients were diagnosed with a causal nephropathy: Prevalence of rare genetic disorders in this group was 4.32% (12/278), including 2,8-dihydroxyadeninuria (2,8-DHA) disease (n = 2), HNF-1B-associated nephropathy (n = 2), UMOD-related nephropathy (n = 5), Fabry disease (n = 1), INF2 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 1), and Senior-Løken syndrome (n = 1). 2,8-DHA nephropathy relapsed in both patients causing an acute renal failure and jeopardizing the graft. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients without a diagnosis of causal nephropathy appear to be a selected population in which rare genetic diseases might be more common than expected. As even a belated diagnosis after KTx can have a significant impact on graft and patient survival and on other family members, this possibility should be evaluated in KTx recipients without a known causal nephropathy.

Letter to the Editor re: Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections?

UNLABELLED: In a recent paper, the authors oppose the opinion that " intra-arterial administration of iodinated-based contrast media (CM) appears to pose a greater risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) than intravenous administration" . As nephrologists, we are happy to have the opportunity to offer our expertise in the setting of renal disease aimed at optimizing diagnostic algorithm and preventive strategies. Our comment relies on the fact that, from a nephrologist's point of view, there is no doubt that renal damage following CM intra-venous administration in patients not in intensive care or emergency department and treated with conventional preventive strategies not only occurs with low frequency, but also appears of negligible clinical impact; it is confined to an asymptomatic increase of serum creatinine of 25% or 0.5 mg/dL lacking any prognostic negative impact, and in some case not significantly different from controls.True CIN, just related to intravenous CM injection for diagnostic purpose, has to be differentiated from all the other cause of renal involvement in people stricken with sudden and acute illness also receiving intra-arterial CM injection, in order to avoid patients being denied necessary radiological examinations due to an inappropriate fear of risk. KEY POINTS: • Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is not any nephropathy following contrast medium(CM). • CIN should only refer to renal damage strictly due to CM infusion. • True CIN following CM intravenous infusion is a clinically insignificant event. • Renal damage following intra-arterial CM infusion in compromised patients is not CIN. • Patients should not forego necessary radiological examinations for inappropriate understanding about risk.

Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Although many patients undergoing kidney transplant are exposed to multiple examinations that increase cumulative effective doses (CEDs) of ionizing radiation, no data are available characterizing their total longitudinal radiation burden and relating radiation burden with risk factors for more exposure. METHODS: We did a retrospective cohort study of 92 patients (mean age 52 years; range: 20-75 years) who underwent kidney transplant at University Hospital, Novara, Italy, that evaluated all following medical imaging procedures involving ionizing radiation undergone beginning June 2007, and all subsequent procedures through August 2011, at the centre. RESULTS: The mean and median annual CED were 17.2 and 4.9 millisieverts (mSv) per patient-year. The mean and median total CED per patient over the study period were 46.1 and 17.3 mSv, respectively. Twenty-eight and 12% of patients had total CED >50 and 100 mSv, values which are associated with a good or strong evidence of an increased cancer mortality risk, respectively. Computed tomography scanning accounted for 73% of the total CED. The annual CED was significantly higher in incident patients and in patients with ischaemic heart disease and cancer. CONCLUSION: In this institution, multiple testing of kidney transplant patients was common in many patients associated with high cumulative estimated doses of ionizing radiation.