Evaluation of electrocardiographic repolarization parameters after administration of trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, detomidine, or their combination in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether administration of trimethoprim-sulfadiazine (TMS), detomidine (DET), or TMS plus DET would be associated with changes in ECG repolarization parameters in horses. ANIMALS: 9 healthy adult horses. PROCEDURES: Each horse received 4 treatments in a blinded, randomized, crossover study design as follows: TMS, 16 to 24 mg/kg, IV; DET, 0.015 to 0.02 mg/kg, IV; TMS plus DET; and saline (0.9% NaCl) solution. Surface ECG traces were obtained over 24 hours, and repolarization parameters were measured at predefined time points after each treatment and compared with a 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures. RESULTS: Heart rate-corrected QT intervals (QTc) were significantly increased after administration of DET (mean ± SD difference in QTc, 36.57 ± 23.07 milliseconds; increase of 7%) and TMS plus DET (44.96 ± 29.16 milliseconds; increase of 9%), compared with baseline (before treatment) values and values after administration of saline solution. Saline solution and TMS alone did not affect QTc. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of DET or TMS plus DET was associated with a significant and possibly clinically relevant prolongation of QTc, with prolongation of 7% to 9%, a range that is considered as a risk factor for the development of cardiac arrhythmias in people. Results were unexpected because DET is considered to be a safe sedative for horses.

Histologic changes and gene expression patterns in biopsy specimens from bacteria-inoculated and noninoculated excisional body and limb wounds in horses healing by second intention.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate histologic changes and gene expression patterns in body and limb wounds in horses in response to bacterial inoculation. SAMPLE: Wound biopsy specimens from 6 horses collected on days 7, 14, 21, and 27 after excisional wounds (20 wounds/horse) were created over the metacarpal and metatarsal region and lateral thoracic region (body) and then inoculated or not inoculated on day 4 with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PROCEDURES: Specimens were histologically scored for the amount of inflammation, edema, angiogenesis, fibrosis organization, and epithelialization. Quantitative PCR assays were performed to quantify gene expression of 10 inflammatory, proteolytic, fibrotic, and hypoxia-related markers involved in wound healing. RESULTS: Except for gene expression of interleukin-6 on day 27 and tumor necrosis factor-α on day 14, bacterial inoculation had no significant effect on histologic scores and gene expression. Gene expression of interleukin-1ß and -6, serum amyloid A, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 was higher in limb wounds versus body wounds by day 27. Gene expression of cellular communication network factor 1 was higher in limb wounds versus body wounds throughout the observation period. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lack of clear markers of wound infection in this study reflected well-known difficulties in detecting wound infections in horses. Changes consistent with protracted inflammation were evident in limb wounds, and gene expression patterns of limb wounds shared similarities with those of chronic wounds in humans. Cellular communication network factor warrants further investigation and may be useful in elucidating the mechanisms underlying poor limb wound healing in horses.