[Evaluation of the use of a simulation software in the learning of cardiopulmonary auscultation in undergraduate medical students]. / Evaluation de l'utilisation d'un logiciel de simulation dans l'apprentissage de l'auscultation cardio-pulmonaire chez les étudiants en premier cycle d'études médicales.

INTRODUCTION: Medsounds™ software allows to create an auscultation learning platform, by providing real pre-recorded cardiopulmonary sounds on virtual chests. The study aimed at comparing the skills in cardiopulmonary auscultation between students who benefited from this platform and students who did not have access to it. METHODS: A controlled trial was conducted with 2nd year medical students randomised into three groups. Groups A, B and C received 10 h of cardiopulmonary clinical training. In addition, group B benefited from an online access to the educative platform, and group C had a demonstration of the platform during their clinical training, then an online access. The main outcome was a 3-point multiple-choice questionnaire based on 2 original case vignettes about the description of cardiopulmonary sounds. The secondary outcome was the faculty exam on high-fidelity cardiopulmonary simulator. RESULTS: Groups A and B included 127 students, and group C 117. Students in group C had a significantly higher score than those in group A (1.72/3 versus 1.48/3; p = 0.02), without difference between the groups B and C. Students who actually had a demonstration of the platform and used it at home had a higher score than those who did not use it (1.87 versus 1.51; p = 0.01). Students who had a demonstration of the platform before using it performed a better pulmonary examination on high-fidelity simulators. CONCLUSION: The supervised use of an online auscultation simulation software in addition to the traditional clinical training seems to improve the auscultation performances of undergraduated medical students.

Virtual versus traditional classroom on facial traumatology learning: Evaluation of medical student's knowledge acquisition and satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: The high rate of absenteeism in the courses led us to offer virtual classrooms to better meet the expectations of students who may have geographical constraints. The objectives of this study were: to compare student's knowledge acquisition and satisfaction between virtual and traditional face-to-face classroom and to determine potential factors that may correlate with the level of knowledge acquisition following both type of courses. METHODS: Our study included fifth-year medical students attending the course of facial traumatology, who voluntarily participated either in virtual or traditional classroom. Students' knowledge acquisition was evaluated through a multiple-choice questions test. A second questionnaire aimed to determine factors potentially correlated with students' knowledge acquisition and to evaluate their satisfaction. Results of questionnaire no 1 were compared between virtual and traditional classroom. Additionally, a correlation study was performed between the results of questionnaire no 1 and the factors listed in questionnaire no 2. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six students participated to the course (virtual: 64, traditional: 72). Knowledge acquisition and concentration level didn't significantly differ between the two groups. Knowledge acquisition was positively correlated with the intensity of study of the course topic prior to the class only in traditional classroom (P<10-2). The main listed advantage of the virtual classroom was its flexibility particularly for students with geographical constraints (15/28). CONCLUSION: Considering there is no noticeable difference in knowledge acquisition between virtual and traditional classroom, we will continue virtual classroom in parallel with traditional classroom and extend it to the other courses of our field.