Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Dairy Res ; 76(1): 6-14, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18922194

RESUMO

There have been increases in the number of organic dairy farms in the UK in recent years. However, there is little information on the impact of organic regulations on cow welfare. As part of a larger study, we aimed to investigate differences between organic and non-organic farms in management practices and winter housing quality. Forty organic and 40 non-organic farms throughout the UK were visited. Organic and non-organic farms were paired for housing type, and as far as possible for herd size, genetic merit and location. A detailed questionnaire covering key aspects of dairy management was carried out with each farmer. On a subset of twenty pairs, an assessment of the quality of the winter housing for both lactating and dry cows was undertaken, covering the parlour, bedding, loafing and feeding areas. Management practices and building conditions varied greatly within farm types and there was considerable overlap between organic and non-organic farms. Milk yield, level and composition of concentrate feed, management of heifers and calving, and use of 'alternative treatments' to prevent and treat mastitis differed between organic and non-organic farms. In all other respects there were no differences between farm types. Building dimensions per cow did not differ, even though organic recommendations advise greater space per cow than recommended for non-organic farms. The similarity between organic and non-organic farms in most respects indicates that cow housing and health, based on both the described management regimes and the farmers' perceptions of disease incidence, on organic dairy farms is neither compromised by the regulations, nor considerably better than on non-organic farms.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Indústria de Laticínios/métodos , Alimentos Orgânicos , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Estações do Ano , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais , Bovinos , Feminino , Incidência , Percepção , Densidade Demográfica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
2.
Vet J ; 180(1): 95-105, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18462961

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the prevalence of lameness on organic and non-organic dairy farms in the United Kingdom (UK) and to assess which cow and farm factors influenced lameness levels. Forty organic and 40 non-organic dairy farms across the UK were repeatedly visited over a 2.5 year period. On each visit all milking cows were locomotion scored, and information about farm housing, management and husbandry practices was recorded on-farm. Over the whole study, the mean herd lameness prevalence was 16.2%, 16.3% and 19.3% in the autumn, winter and spring observation periods, respectively. Lameness prevalence was lower (P=0.012) on organic farms compared to non-organic farms. Numerous specific factors were found to significantly influence the prevalence of lameness. This study provided evidence that organic management reduced herd lameness. It supported previous research which suggested that lameness is a serious problem on many farms in the UK and further emphasised the multi-factorial aetiology of lameness problems.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos/métodos , Bem-Estar do Animal , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Indústria de Laticínios/métodos , Coxeadura Animal/epidemiologia , Criação de Animais Domésticos/normas , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/etiologia , Doenças dos Bovinos/prevenção & controle , Indústria de Laticínios/normas , Feminino , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Coxeadura Animal/etiologia , Coxeadura Animal/prevenção & controle , Locomoção , Fatores de Risco , Estações do Ano , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...