RESUMO
Endoscopic vein harvest remains underused in single-stage brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula creation. We analyzed our results with the use of this technique in a cohort of predominantly obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) patients. Demographics, intraoperative details, and outcomes for all consecutive patients who underwent single-stage endoscopic-assisted brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula creation between 2020 and 2022 at a single institute were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were technical success, fistula maturation, and primary assisted and secondary patency rates. Of the 11 patients (7 men; mean age, 62 ± 11.6 years), 7 (64%) already required dialysis at referral. The mean body mass index was 34 ± 7 kg/m2, 64% were obese, and an additional 27% were overweight. The medical comorbidities included hypertension in 11 patients (100%), diabetes in 7 (64%), and smoking in 8 (73%). Technical success was 100%, with no intraoperative complications. The median procedural length was 231 minutes (range, 183-302 minutes). Early complications in two patients (18%) included bleeding of the venous side branch requiring ligation and the loss of thrill requiring division of a tethering bridge of a large tributary. The maturation rate was 100%, and the brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula was successfully accessed in all patients who required dialysis. At 12 months, the primary assisted and secondary patency rates were 90% ± 10% and 100%, respectively. Reintervention in seven patients (64%) included successful angioplasty in four, thrombectomy in two, and aneurysm resection with an interposition graft in one patient. Endoscopic vein harvest can be used for single-stage brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula creation with good technical success and favorable maturation and patency rates, even for obese patients.
RESUMO
Background: Cognitive and behavioural difficulties after acquired brain injury (ABI) may lead to reduced engagement in leisure and social activities. Increasing participation is a goal of neuropsychological rehabilitation and assistive and behaviour change technology can play an important role in this. Focus groups and interviews were conductive with brain injury rehabilitation stakeholders (n = 24): people with ABI (n = 9), family members (n = 3) and care providers (n = 12) in order to understand the barriers to engaging in meaningful activities and what helps to overcome these barriers. A collaborative thematic analysis was performed by a multi-disciplinary research team using an approach based on Grounded Theory. Results: Four central, interlinked, barriers were found: Access, Cognitive Difficulties, Anticipation (of Physical or Cognitive Difficulties) and Motivation. To overcome these barriers, participants cited themes such as External Motivation from both Other People and Technology, Maintaining Momentum and different aspects of Being Planful. Conclusions: The results point to future directions for the purposeful development of effective assistive technology for this user group. Technology that is social, persuasive, adapts to individual needs and supports people to plan activities are likely to be particularly useful within neuropsychological rehabilitation.Implications For RehabilitationAdults with ABI and their carers describe problems accessing activities, cognitive difficulties, anticipationof physical or cognitive difficulties and low motivation as the key barriers to undertaking meaningfulactivities.Current solutions are external prompting, maintaining momentum and being planful.This detailed qualitative analysis of a diverse group of carers and service users allows insight into theassistive technologies that could aid rehabilitation.
