Do racial and ethnic disparities lead to the undertreatment of pain? Are there solutions?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review aims to empower anesthesiologists, specifically pain medicine specialists, to become leaders in ensuring equitable care. RECENT FINDINGS: Disparities in both acute and chronic pain medicine lead to increased morbidity for patients of color. Gaps in care include misdiagnosis or under diagnosis of chronic pain disease states, undertreatment of sickle cell disease and other conditions that are common in minorities, under prescription of opioids, and lack of access to novel opioid sparing treatments. While the causes of these disparities are multifactorial, care team implicit bias and lack of representation are two of the major factors. Solutions are challenging, but the authors suggest an inside out solution. We believe that this practice will have far-reaching downstream effects, including improving diversity in our field and quality of care for our patients. SUMMARY: The current article reviews disparities in both acute and chronic pain treatment for underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. The authors examine whether implicit bias and lack of representation are a contributing factor for these disparities. Lastly, we will discuss potential solutions.

Workforce solutions to address health disparities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on physician workforce racial & ethnic diversity as a solution to improve perioperative and peripartum health equity. RECENT FINDINGS: Black, Indigenous, and Hispanic physicians remain underrepresented in medicine (URiM) and anesthesiology, and efforts to expand this workforce have had limited impact. Psychological forces, including implicit bias, aversive racism, outgroup bias, racial attention bias, stereotype threat, and imposter syndrome all act to reinforce structural racism and decrease opportunity for advancement. Evidence based solutions are emerging, but require institutional commitment and widespread engagement of the entire medical community. SUMMARY: Academic medicine has recognized the need to diversify the physician workforce for more than 50 years, and yet Black, Indigenous, and Hispanic physicians remain URiM. Foundational assumptions and power structures in medicine limit entry, advancement, and retention of URiM physicians. Solutions require leadership and institutional commitment to change the policies, procedures, priorities, and culture of academic medicine.

Peripartum considerations in sickle cell disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pregnancy exacerbates sickle cell disease (SCD) and is associated with increased frequency and severity of complications resulting in high levels of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. We review recent recommendations for managing SCD in pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: An updated pathobiological model of SCD now attributes the clinical picture to a vicious cycle of four major cellular disturbances. Management decisions should be guided by an understanding of this upgraded model. Red cell transfusions are a key therapeutic intervention used in managing several acute and chronic complications. Transfusion however has significant drawbacks. The American Society of Hematology recently published transfusion guidelines to support care providers. SUMMARY: Patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary and experienced team. The perioperative episode is a recognized period of disease exacerbation and informed anesthetic management can contribute to improved patient outcomes.

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Mortality.

Racism in America has deep roots that impact maternal health, particularly through pervasive inequities among Black women as compared with White, although other racial and ethnic groups also suffer. Health care providers caring for pregnant women are optimally positioned to maintain vigilance for these disparities in maternal care, and to intervene with their diverse skillsets and knowledge. By increasing awareness of how structural racism drives inequities in health, these providers can encourage hospitals and practices to develop and implement national bundles for patient safety, and use bias training and team-based training practices aimed at improving care for racially diverse mothers.

Racial Differences in Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Mortality.

Racism in the United States has deep roots that affect maternal health, particularly through pervasive inequalities among black women compared with white. Anesthesiologists are optimally positioned to maintain vigilance for these disparities in maternal care, and to intervene with their unique acute critical care skills and knowledge. As leaders in patient safety, anesthesiologists should drive hospitals and practices to develop and implement national bundles for patient safety, as well as using team-based training practices designed to improve hospitals that care for racially diverse mothers.

Healthcare provider perceptions of disparities in perioperative care.

INTRODUCTION: Many strategies to alleviate racial/ethnic disparities in surgical care target healthcare providers. Yet limited data exists about the perception of disparities among the range of clinical staff who work in perioperative settings. Such information could help initiate conversations about disparities in perioperative care and, if necessary, implement interventions to alleviate them. Our aim was to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics, clinical position (physicians and non-physicians) and perception of perioperative disparities at a large tertiary care center. METHODS: We surveyed perioperative staff at the institution using an anonymous online survey. Primary outcome was respondents' perception of disparities in perioperative care at the institution due to patients' insurance status/type, ability to speak English, education, and racial/ethnic minority status. The association between clinical position (physician vs. non-physician) and perception of disparities was assessed in bivariate and then multivariable analysis, adjusting for respondents' race, sex, age, and years at the institution. Secondary outcomes included perception of disparities in perioperative care in the United States due to patients' insurance status/type, ability to speak English, education, and racial/ethnic minority status. RESULTS: 217 completed questions that could be analyzed. Among these responders, 101 were physicians (46.5%), 165 (76.0%) were white, and 144 (66.4.%) were female. Bivariate and multivariate analysis revealed that physicians had higher perception of disparities in perioperative care at the institution based on patients' ability to speak English, education, and racial/ethnic minority status. Physicians also had higher perceptions of disparities in perioperative care in the United States than non-physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported higher perceptions of disparities in perioperative care than non-physicians, potentially explained by differences in training or contact with patients. Such findings serve as a first step at examining and discussing disparities in perioperative care and warrant further study.

Over-screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea among urban women age ≥25 years.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) in older women who are at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) based on community STI prevalence. Additionally, we explored the associations between STI risk factors and CT/NG to determine the percentage of women who were over-screened. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective chart review of women ≥25 years old who were either tested or screened for CT/NG during a gynecology visit at an urban teaching institution. Pregnancy and HIV infection were exclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Of 658 eligible women, the median age of those positive for CT/NG was 30 years (range, 26-41 years). Chlamydia and gonorrhea prevalence was 1.7% (11/658 women) and 0.3% (2/658 women), respectively. All positive results were captured by testing women of any age who reported symptoms or an STI exposure and by screening women who were ≤40 years old. After adjustment of data for age, we found that symptomatic women were 3 times more likely to test positive for CT/NG (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-10.3) and that STI-exposed women were 10 times more likely to test positive for CT/NG (adjusted odds ratio, 10; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-52.5). In asymptomatic non-STI-exposed women, nonmonogamous relationship (P = 1.0), abnormal examination results (P = 1.0), and previous STI (P = .35) were not associated with CT/NG. Over-screening occurred in 21% of women (141/658), all of whom were menopausal, had a hysterectomy, or were >40 years old. CONCLUSION: CT/NG prevalence among older women was low, even in a community of high STI prevalence. More than 20% of women could have avoided CT/NG evaluation without impacting the detection of positive results in our clinic cohort. Over-screening occurred among asymptomatic, non-STI-exposed women who were menopausal, had a hysterectomy, and were >40 years old.