RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vascular access site complications are the most frequent complications of percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Whether arterial/venous vascular closure devices (VCDs) prevent vascular complications is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the benefit of VCDs in patients undergoing CA of VAs. METHODS: Consecutive CA of VAs were included (2018-2022). Vascular accesses were obtained with ultrasound guidance. At the discretion of the operator, arterial and/or venous VCDs were used. Cases were divided into 3 groups: no use of VCDs for any arterial/venous accesses (manual compression [MC]), use of VCDs for some but not all accesses (Partial-VCDs), and use of VCDs for all accesses (Complete-VCDs). Vascular complications were classified as minor if they did not require intervention or major if they required intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1016 procedures were performed in 872 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years; mean body mass index 30 ± 6 kg/m2; 27% female) during the study period. Femoral arterial access was obtained in 887 procedures (875 single access: 7.4 ± 1.5 F size; 12 two accesses: 7.3 ± 3 and 6.9 ± 1.8 F). Femoral venous access was obtained in 1014 procedures (unilateral in 17%; bilateral in 83%; mean number of access sites per patient 2.6 ± 0.7; mean size 8.4 ± 1.3 F). Hemostasis was achieved with MC in 192 procedures (19%), with Partial-VCD in 275 (27%), and with Complete-VCD in 549 (54%). A vascular complication occurred in 52 procedures (5.1%), including a minor hematoma in 3.9% and/or a major complication in 1.7%. The rate of vascular complications was 6.8% (5.2% minor and 1.6% major) in the MC group, 7.6% (5.1% minor and 3.3% major) in the Partial-VCD group, and 3.3% (2.9% minor and 0.9% major) in the Complete-VCD group (P = .014 for comparison). In multivariable analysis, Complete-VCD remained independently associated with a lower risk of vascular complications (odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.96; P = .036). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing CA of VAs, Complete-VCD is associated with lower rates of vascular-related complications compared with MC or Partial-VCD.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous genetic heart disease with an estimated prevalence in the general population of 0.2% to 0.6%. Clinically, HCM can range from no symptoms to severe symptoms such as heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Currently, the management of HCM involves lifestyle modifications, familial screening, genetic counseling, pharmacotherapy to manage symptoms, sudden cardiac death risk assessment, septal reduction therapy, and heart transplantation for specific patients. Multicenter randomized controlled trials have only recently explored the potential of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) such as mavacamten as a directed pharmacological approach for managing HCM. AREAS COVERED: We will assess the existing medical treatments for HCM: beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, disopyramide, and different CMIs. We will also discuss future HCM pharmacotherapy guidelines and underline this patient population's unfulfilled needs. EXPERT OPINION: Mavacamten is the first-in-class CMI approved by the FDA to target HCM pathophysiology specifically. Mavacamten should be incorporated into the standard therapy for oHCM in case of symptom persistence despite using maximally tolerated beta blockers and/or calcium channel blockers. Potential drug-drug interactions should be assessed before initiating this drug. More studies are needed on the use of CMIs in patients with kidney and/or liver failure and pregnant/breastfeeding patients.