Clinicians navigating moral accountability when discussing parental behaviors in the care of the child in the hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore how moral accountability is navigated when clinicians talk about parental behaviors to support the health of the hospitalized child. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 74 conversations during daily rounds video recorded as part of a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to advance family-centered rounds in one children's hospital. Conversations involving children under the age 18 who were cared for by a pediatric hospitalist service, pulmonary service, or hematology/oncology service were recorded. We used conversation analysis to analyze sequences in which physicians engaged in talk that had implications for parent behavior. RESULTS: Two phenomena were apparent in how physicians and parents navigated moral accountability. First, physicians avoided or delayed parental agency in their references to parent behaviors. Second, parents demonstrated and clinicians reassured parental competence of parents caring for their children. CONCLUSION: Physicians appeared to be oriented toward the potential moral implications of asking about parental behavior. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Avoiding attributions of agency and moral accountability as well as providing reassurance for the parents' competence may be useful for clinicians to maintain a good relationship with the parents of children in their care in the hospital setting.

Shame in patient-health professional encounters: A scoping review.

Shame can arise during patient-health professional encounters when discussing traumatising and stigmatising topics and can contribute to negative patient outcomes. This review aims to summarise what is known regarding shame in patient-health professional encounters. We conducted a scoping review using Levac and colleagues' approach and reported the findings using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched four databases (CINAHL, PsychINFO, PubMed and SocINDEX) for empirical studies that involved shame in patient-health professional encounters contextualised by trauma or stigma and were published in English. We categorised what is known regarding shame in empirical studies using inductive content analysis. We also collected stakeholders' perspectives on the review findings through an online survey. Our initial search yielded 3658 articles, of which 37 were included. We summarised the literature into four categories: (1) What health professionals say they do in patient-health professional encounters, (2) What health professionals think patients feel in patient-health professional encounters, (3) Patients' descriptions of their own shame during patient-health professional encounters and (4) Health professionals' descriptions of their own shame during patient-health professional encounters. Shame can arise in a variety of circumstances during patient-health professional encounters. More research is needed to identify what specific communication strategies used by health professionals during patient-health professional encounters contribute to or avoid patient shame.

Decoding context memories for threat in large-scale neural networks.

Humans are often tasked with determining the degree to which a given situation poses threat. Salient cues present during prior events help bring online memories for context, which plays an informative role in this process. However, it is relatively unknown whether and how individuals use features of the environment to retrieve context memories for threat, enabling accurate inferences about the current level of danger/threat (i.e. retrieve appropriate memory) when there is a degree of ambiguity surrounding the present context. We leveraged computational neuroscience approaches (i.e. independent component analysis and multivariate pattern analyses) to decode large-scale neural network activity patterns engaged during learning and inferring threat context during a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging task. Here, we report that individuals accurately infer threat contexts under ambiguous conditions through neural reinstatement of large-scale network activity patterns (specifically striatum, salience, and frontoparietal networks) that track the signal value of environmental cues, which, in turn, allows reinstatement of a mental representation, primarily within a ventral visual network, of the previously learned threat context. These results provide novel insight into distinct, but overlapping, neural mechanisms by which individuals may utilize prior learning to effectively make decisions about ambiguous threat-related contexts as they navigate the environment.

"I am not a junkie": Social categorization and differentiation among people who use drugs.

BACKGROUND: Substance use stigma is a form of group-based exclusion, and delineating pathways from stigma to poor health requires a deeper understanding of the social dynamics of people who use drugs (PWUD). Outside of recovery, scant research has examined the role of social identity in addiction. Framed by Social Identity Theory/Self-Categorization Theory, this qualitative study investigated strategies of within-group categorization and differentiation among PWUD and the roles these social categories may play in shaping intragroup attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors. METHODS: Data come from the Rural Opioid Initiative, a multi-site study of the overdose epidemic in rural United States. We conducted in-depth interviews with people who reported using opioids or injecting any drug (n=355) living in 65 counties across 10 states. Interviews focused on participants' biographical histories, past and current drug use, risk behaviors, and experiences with healthcare providers and law enforcement. Social categories and dimensions along which categories were evaluated were inductively identified using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified seven social categories that were commonly appraised by participants along eight evaluative dimensions. Categories included drug of choice, route of administration, method of attainment, gender, age, genesis of use, and recovery approach. Categories were evaluated by participants based on ascribed characteristics of morality, destructiveness, aversiveness, control, functionality, victimhood, recklessness, and determination. Participants performed nuanced identity work during interviews, including reifying social categories, defining 'addict' prototypicality, reflexively comparing self to other, and disidentifying from the PWUD supra-category. CONCLUSION: We identify several facets of identity, both behavioral and demographic, along which people who use drugs perceive salient social boundaries. Beyond an addiction-recovery binary, identity is shaped by multiple aspects of the social self in substance use. Patterns of categorization and differentiation revealed negative intragroup attitudes, including stigma, that may hinder solidary-building and collective action in this marginalized group.

Concept analysis of shame in nursing.

Nurses can facilitate opportunities for patients who feel shame to experience healing in their mental health. Disciplines such as psychology have extensive shame research, yet nursing may provide a unique perspective to bolster research on shame. The objective of this analysis is to examine the use of shame as a concept in nursing literature. This review was guided by Beth Rodgers' Evolutionary approach to concept analysis. Rodgers' approach entails investigating attributes, related terms, surrogate terms, antecedents, and consequences of shame; and examining the use of the concept shame over time to determine if its use changed. Sampled literature came from Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus with Full Text, PubMed, Web of Science, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition. The final sample used for analysis included 334 sources published between 1993 and 2020. The use of shame did not change during these years. Attributes were negative sense of self, feeling worthless, and feeling vulnerable. There were no surrogate terms and three related terms: guilt, humiliation, and embarrassment. Antecedents were trauma, stigma, and perception of moral wrongdoing. Consequences included healthcare avoidance, social withdrawal or isolation, negative coping mechanisms, resilience, lifestyle changes, and healthy coping. There is a discrepancy between the conceptualization and use of shame in nursing and other disciplines. Other disciplines, such as psychology, provide more direction about how interpersonal interactions can elicit or alleviate feelings of shame. Nurses can apply this conceptualization in their clinical practice to support patients experiencing shame.