Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most mutilating procedures, with important postoperative morbidity, an altered body image, and long-term physical and psychosocial concerns. This study aimed to assess quality of life (QOL) during the first year after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy performed with curative intent. METHODS: A French multicentric prospective study was performed by including patients who underwent pelvic exenteration. Quality of life by measurement of functional and symptom scales was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires before surgery, at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The study enrolled 97 patients. Quality of life including physical, personal, fatigue, and anorexia reported in the QLQ-C30 was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively and improved at least to baseline level 1 year after the procedure. Body image also was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively. Global health, emotional, dyspnea, and anorexia items were significantly improved 1 year after surgery compared with baseline values. Unlike younger patients, elderly patients did not regain physical and social activities after pelvic exenteration. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic decision on performing a pelvic exenteration can have a severe and permanent impact on all aspects of patients' QOL. Deterioration of QOL was most significant during the first 3 months after surgery. Elderly patients were the only group of patients with permanent decreased physical and social function. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up evaluation should include health-related QOL instruments, counseling by a multidisciplinary team to cover all aspects concerning stoma care, sexual function, and long-term concerns after surgery.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy after concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer compared to laparotomy: A multi institutional prospective pilot study of cost, surgical outcome and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopy allows hysterectomies after chemoradiation to be performed without opening the abdominal wall. We measured the costs and quality of life for locally advanced cervical cancer patients operated on via laparoscopy compared to laparotomy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an observational prospective multicenter study on locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing an extrafascial hysterectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We assessed the costs from the medical visit before surgery up to the first month after surgery from the providers' perspective and measured the quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24 up to six months. RESULTS: Sixty two patients (39 laparoscopy and 23 laparotomy) from December 2008 to November 2011 were included. There was no difference in operative time, or intraoperative and post-operative complication rates between the two groups. Intraoperative transfusion and abdominal drain were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group (respectively, p = 0.04 and p < 0.01), as well as the duration of hospital stay (7.3 d vs. 5.7 d, p < 0.001). All patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy were discharged to home, whereas 4 laparotomy patients used convalescence homes (p = 0.01). Mean costs at one month were €10,991 for laparotomy and €11,267 for laparoscopy (p = 0.76). Sexual activity is better for the laparoscopy group at six months (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy for an extrafascial hysterectomy after CRT in locally advanced cervical cancer patients brought better quality of life with similar costs compared to laparotomy, and should therefore be the first choice for surgeons.

[Quality of life after lipomodelling: retrospective study of 42 patients]. / Qualité de vie après lipomodelage: étude rétrospective à propos de 42 patientes.

OBJECTIVES: Study of the quality of life of 42 patients who underwent a lipofilling in our institution between 2009 and 2010. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Analysis of cosmetic outcomes, side effects, emotional life and preoperative information received by a cohort of 42 patients contacted by anonymous questionnaires. Comparisons between patients with a single prothesis, latissimus dorsi flap with prothesis, autologous latissimus dorsi flap and rectus abdominal flap. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (42 patients). The average volume of fat injected was 80mL. The aspect of the reconstructed breast and the harmony between two breasts were better after lipofilling (P=0.0001, P=0.0005). The evolution of the aesthetic result is satisfying for 64.1% of the patients. In 29% of cases, patients noticed adhesions at the injection site. Apprehension to touch the reconstructed breast and to wear a swimsuit decreases after lipofilling (P=0.0345;P=0.0284). All patients declared to be satisfied with the presurgery information. Half of the patients declare that the final result corresponds to their wishes. DISCUSSION: The side effects of lipofilling were studied from an oncological point of view. Less publications describe the patients quality of life after lipofilling. This surgery improves the breast reconstruction results and helps patients in a social, affective and aesthetic way. Overall, lipofilling improves more consistency in patients reconstructed by single prothesis and improves more appearance in patients reconstructed by single flap. CONCLUSION: Lipofilling improves significantly patients' quality of life. A clinical research protocol (GRATSEC) is currently underway to extend its indications. The lipofilling should not replace a bad indication of breast reconstruction.

Pure tubular carcinoma of the breast and sentinel lymph node biopsy: a retrospective multi-institutional study of 234 cases.

BACKGROUND: Pure Tubular Carcinoma (PTC) of the breast is a rare histological subtype of invasive breast cancer characterized by a low rate of lymph node involvement. Currently there is no consensus on less surgical axillary node staging according to this histological subtype. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-institutional study. Inclusion criteria were PTC, sentinel lymph node detection (SLND) and conservative breast surgery. RESULTS: From January 1999 to December 2006, 234 patients were included in the study from 9 institutions. The median pathological tumor size was 9.59 (1-22) mm. SLN were successfully detected in 98% (229/234) of patients. Among the 234 patients, a macrometastasis was found in 6 cases (2.5%), micrometastasis in 15 cases (6.4%), and isolated cells in 2 cases (0.8%). In the case of patients with SLND macrometastasis, half of them had macrometastasis in the complementary axillary lymphadenectomy, and none in the case of SLN only micrometastasis or isolated cells. Of the 122 patients with a pathological tumor size <10 mm, none had sentinel node macrometastasis. According to a multivariate analysis, pathological tumor size (>10 mm) was the only parameter significatively linked to the risk of lymph node involvement (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In a large multi-institutional series with SLND, we have shown that the risk of axillary lymph node involvement in PTC is very low. In the case of PTC <10 mm, we suggest that surgical axillary evaluation, even with SLND, may not be warranted.

Prognostic factors for patients treated for a recurrent FIGO stage III ovarian cancer: a retrospective study of 108 cases.

AIMS: To determine overall survival of patients treated for a first relapse of FIGO stage III ovarian cancer, outside of randomized trial, with a long term follow-up and to identify prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 108 patients treated for a first relapse of a FIGO stage III ovarian cancer was retrospectively included from December 1999 to November 2004. Each patient was treated with platinum-based chemotherapy in case of late (>6 months) relapse and with salvage chemotherapy without platinum in case of <6 months relapse. For statistical analysis the studied parameters were age, histological subtype, the completeness of initial surgery, disease-free period, localization of the relapse, clinical response to second-line chemotherapy, the completeness of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) when it was performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up from the first relapse was 40 months. From the 108 patients, 35 underwent SCS. Median overall survival from the first relapse was 13 months in case of no SCS or non-optimal SCS and 35 months for patient with an optimal SCS (p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis age, disease-free period, the clinical presentation of the relapse, completeness of SCS and response to second line chemotherapy appeared to be independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors of ovarian cancer relapse are directly or indirectly linked with the feasibility of a complete SCS. Thus in the case of an ovarian cancer relapse, the feasibility of SCS must be considered in order to give the patient the best chance to experience its complete removal.

[Oncologic, functional, and aesthetics results; evaluation of the quality of life after latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. About a retrospective series of 450 patients]. / Résultats oncologiques, fonctionnels et esthétiques ; évaluation de la qualité de vie après reconstruction mammaire par lambeau de muscle grand dorsal. À propos d'une série rétrospective de 450 patientes.

Retrospective assesssment from 1998 to 2005 from women who have a breast reconstruction by autologus latissimus flap or by latissimus flap and silicone breast implant for differed breast reconstruction (DBR) or mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (MIBR). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Analysis of oncologic results on 450 patients. Analysis of aesthetic, functional results and of quality of life by an anonymous questionnaire in the non progressive patients (407): 263 appraisable answers (13 DBR, 127 MIBR). Middle age: 49.8 years. RESULTS ONCOLOGIC: Forty-three patients (9.5%) had a relapse of their disease, 33 patients died (7.2%). The relapse of the disease was done in the form of metastasis alone: 29 (67.4%), metastasis and local recurrence: three (7%), local recurrence only: four (9.3%), not specified: seven (16.3%). The average time between the breast reconstruction and the relapse was 18.25±15.4 months. AESTHETIC RESULTS: The overall assessment is of 7.68/10. There is no statistical difference between immediate reconstruction and delayed reconstruction. A total of 11.2% patients considered it to be bad (<5/10). The symmetry between the two breasts in time is of 6.6/10 and 19.9% patients considered it to be bad (<5/10). The scar ransom, considered to be most important, is mostly in the back (4.1/10) then on the controlateral breast and then the breast reconstruction. This ransom is not easily acceptable in 15 to 20% of the patients. FUNCTIONAL RESULTS: The discomfort and the pain prevail above all in the back (3.56 and 2.59/10). Weaker symptoms in the event of immediate reconstruction than delayed reconstruction. We noted that 77.2% had kinesitherapy after surgery and 18.9% continues to have kinesitherapy, long time after surgery, mainly for massages of the back. The handicap is considered to be overall low 2.5/10 but 10% of the patients keep a feeling of important handicap (>7.5/10). QUALITY OF LIFE RESULTS: Seventy-one of the patients are serene. The discomfort to wear a bathing suit or to look at bare-chested is low (2.59 and 2.44/10). However 8.9% are in a very discomfort to see themselves bare-chested and 17.6% to show themselves to their spouse, with an impact on their emotional and sexual life in 36.4% of the cases. There is no significant difference between MIBR and DBR but on the other hand according to the judgement of the woman of her aesthetic result. A total of 95.7% do not regret having made this breast reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This study makes it possible to concentrate on the group of non satisfied patient for better determining the causes and the improvements of the surgical techniques to bring but also the overall surgical management of the patient even if most of the patients were mainly satisfied with their breast reconstruction.

[Evaluation of an information network and nurse consultation for breast reconstruction]. / Évaluation d'un dispositif d'annonce et d'information adapté à la reconstruction mammaire en cancérologie.

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the installation of a nurse consultation and an interactive support DVD in breast reconstruction. To judge utility of these new tools of information for the patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The nurse consultation is carried out after the initial consultation of the surgeon; during this consultation, a DVD containing of the interviews is given taking again the information given as well as patients' evidence on their path of care. Evaluation of the information given by the surgeon and the nurse (eight items from surgical techniques to convalescence). Evaluation of the interest and comprehensibility. Quotation from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Evaluation by anonymous questionnaire on 110 women, between February and December 2007. Rate of participation: 72.7% (80/110); mean age: 51.5±9.2. Information given is considered to be useful (surgeon: quotation above 9.3/10 in function of the items, nurse: quotation above 9.4) and comprehensible (quotation above 8.7/quotation above 8.9). The information made by the nurse is more comprehensible than that done by the surgeon, for over all items. The nurse consultation is considered to be very useful (9.45). Seventy percent of the patients learned from extra informations, compared to the consultation of the surgeon. This consultation does not have a direct influence on the choice of the technique (5.45/10), the consultation of the surgeon remaining predominant. Fifty percent of the women still learned from new informations, by using the DVD. On the other hand, it has little influence on the choice of the technique (4.84/10). The nurse consultation and the DVD are well conceived because 80% of the women did not need more information. The predominant elements in the choice of the patients are the surgeon consultation, then the nurse consultation and then the DVD. The total index of satisfaction is very good 9.31/10 (surgeon: 9.24, nurse 9.56, DVD 9.11). CONCLUSION: The nurse consultation and the DVD are not replacement components of the surgeon consultation. They are complementary and have an important role in the acquisition of information and the psychological support of the patients. The surgeon initial consultation remains predominent in the decision of choice by the patients, it must remain the most complete possible.

[Patient follow-up after treatment for breast cancer]. / Surveillance d'une femme traitée pour cancer du sein.

Patient follow-up after treatment for a breast cancer is based on the local recurrence risk. Annual mammography remains the main point of this follow-up and tumor markers detection has still no interest. Absence of benefit of an intensive clinical, biological and radiological surveillance has been proved for a long time but expert recommendations still are a subject of discussion although they knew no evolution for more than 10 years. Evolution of those follow-up modalities will depend on the future indications of MRI and PET. About distant recurrence, a better knowledge of the risk is now possible thanks to the tumor biological profile study. Nevertheless, intensification of follow-up for some kind of high-risk tumors will have interest only if we can propose a therapeutic alternative in metastatic situation.

[Surgery for invasive breast cancer]. / Chirurgie des cancers invasifs du sein (à l'exception de la reconstruction mammaire).

As most solid tumors, surgery is often the first step of the multidisciplinary management for breast cancers. Although mastectomy and axillar lymphadenectomy still have indications, conservative treatment and sentinel node detection are commonly used. Thanks to induction chemotherapy and oncoplastic techniques, surgery is conservative in most cases, even for important tumors without overall survival prejudice. There is no consensus about resection margins status but a limit of 2 to 3 mm seems to be reasonable while oncoplastic surgery allows large resection and good cosmetic outcomes. In this overview, we present the state of the art for breast cancer surgery including conservative and radical treatments, axillar lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node detection, margins status, oncoplastic techniques.

[Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer]. / La chimiothérapie intrapéritonéale dans les cancers avancés de l'ovaire.

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consist in complete surgical debulking and intravenous platin and taxane based chemotherapy. Despite research efforts, a lot of patients still die from peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of our work was to present the state of art about intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC): three multi-institutional randomised trials showed that platin based IPC gave better results in term of overall and disease free survival when compared to standard intravenous treatment. Even so, IPC is not yet becoming a new international standard of treatment because a high rate of morbidity. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents an innovative alternative to IPC. HIPEC is based on a complete surgical debulking without any visible mass and an intraperitoneal chemotherapy with synergy of hyperthermia. Phase II trails have shown its feasibility. Randomised trials are needed to assess its efficiency in improving survival.

[Management of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer]. / Cancer de l'ovaire à un stade avancé : la place des curages ganglionnaires.

The standard management for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is optimum cytoreductive surgery followed by aggressive cytotoxic chemotherapy. However retroperitoneal remains controversial. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of disease progression and the histological type. Thus, it is difficult to specify a single node as the sentinel node. In this chapter, we review and discuss the actual benefits of lymph node dissection in patients with ovarian cancer, analysing previously reported and ongoing trials. A recent large randomized trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer revealed that systemic lymphadenectomy had no impact on survival compared with removing only macroscopic lymph nodes but improves progression-free survival significantly. Further studies are needed to balance risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage disease.