Dosimetric Impact of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Delivery Methods Using Voluntary DIBH and Free Breathing Techniques.

Hodgkin lymphomas are radiosensitive and curable tumors that often involve the mediastinum. However, the application of radiation therapy to the mediastinum is associated with late effects including cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and secondary cancers. The adoption of conformal IMRT and deep inspiration breath- hold (DIBH) can reduce the dose to healthy normal tissues (lungs, heart and breast). We compared the dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) using different IMRT techniques for two breathing conditions, i.e., deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing. Twenty-three patients with early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphomas were accrued in the prospective study. The patients were given treatment plans which utilized full arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (F-VMAT), Butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT), and fixed field IMRT (FF-IMRT) techniques for both DIBH and free breathing methods, respectively. All the plans were optimized to deliver 95% of the prescription dose which was 25.2 Gy to 95% of the PTV volume. The mean dose and standard error of the mean for each OAR, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the target using the three planning techniques were calculated and compared using Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric data. The HI and CI of the target was not compromised using the DIBH technique for mediastinal lymphomas. The mean values of CI and HI for both DIBH and FB were comparable. The mean heart doses were reduced by 2.1 Gy, 2.54 Gy, and 2.38 Gy in DIBH compared to FB for the F-VMAT, B-VMAT, and IMRT techniques, respectively. There was a significant reduction in V5Gy, V10Gy, and V15Gy to the heart (p < 0.005) with DIBH. DIBH reduced the mean dose to the total lung by 1.19 Gy, 1.47 Gy, and 1.3 Gy, respectively. Among the 14 female patients, there was a reduction in the mean right breast dose with DIBH compared to FB (4.47 Gy vs. 3.63 Gy, p = 0.004). DIBH results in lower heart, lung, and breast doses than free breathing in mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma. Among the different IMRT techniques, FF-IMRT, B-VMAT, and F-VMAT showed similar PTV coverage, with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the time taken for FF-IMRT was much longer than for the F-VMAT and B-VMAT techniques for both breathing methods. B-VMAT and F-VMAT emerged as the optimal planning techniques able to achieve the best target coverage and lower doses to the OARs, with less time required to deliver the prescribed dose.

Can knowledge based treatment planning of VMAT for post-mastectomy locoregional radiotherapy involving internal mammary chain and supraclavicular fossa improve performance efficiency?

Introduction: To validate and evaluate the performance of knowledge-based treatment planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for post-mastectomy loco-regional radiotherapy. Material and methods: Two knowledge-based planning (KBP) models for different dose prescriptions were built using the Eclipse RapidPlanTM v 16.1 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA) utilising the plans of previously treated patients with left-sided breast cancer who had undergone irradiation of the left chest wall, internal mammary nodal (IMN) region and supra-clavicular fossa (SCF). Plans of 60 and 73 patients were used to generate the KBP models for the prescriptions of 40 Gy in 15 fractions and 26 Gy in 5 fractions, respectively. A blinded review of all the clinical plans (CLI) and KBPs was done by two experienced radiation oncology consultants. Statistical analysis of the two groups was also done using the standard two-tailed paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 20 metrics were compared. The KBPs were found to be either better (6/20) or comparable (10/20) to the CLIs for both the regimens. Dose to heart, contralateral breast,contralateral lung were either better or comparable in the KBP plans except of ipsilateral lung. Mean dose (Gy) for the ipsilateral lung are significantly (p˂0.001) higher in KBP though the values were acceptable clinically. Plans were of similar quality as per the result of the blinded review which was conducted by slice-by-slice evaluation of dose distribution for target coverage, overdose volume and dose to the OARs. However, it was also observed that treatment times in terms of monitoring units (MUs) and complexity indices are more in CLIs as compared with KBPs (p<0.001). Discussion: KBP models for left-sided post-mastectomy loco-regional radiotherapy were developed and validated for clinical use. These models improved the efficiency of treatment delivery as well as work flow for VMAT planning involving both moderately hypo fractionated and ultra-hypo fractionated radiotherapy regimens.

Salvage (Re)radiation in Oligometastatic and Oligorecurrent Cervical Cancer.

PURPOSE: In patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, the median survival time is 13 to 24 months based on the choice of palliative systemic chemotherapy. Evolving evidence suggests that the addition of radiation may lead to improved survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients treated with radiation with or without systemic chemotherapy for oligometastatic or oligorecurrent disease within the period from 2017 to 2020 were included. All patients received systemic chemotherapy consultation and radiation to relapsed or metastatic sites. Progression-free survival (PFS) was determined as the period between diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and the last progression of the disease. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time between the date of diagnosis of relapse or metastasis and follow-up or death. The effect of various prognostic and predictive factors was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients were included. The median time to relapse was 18 months (8-205 months). At the time of first relapse, 34.4% of patients (n = 20) had locoregional relapse, 32.8% (n = 19) had distant nodal metastases, and 32.8% (n = 19) had visceral metastases. The relapse was within previously irradiated portals in 34.5% (n = 20), out of field in 50% (n = 29), and both in 15.5% (n = 9) of patients. Overall, 56% of patients (n = 33) received systemic chemotherapy. The radiation therapy dose in equivalent doses of 2 Gy at the time of retreatment was 44 Gy (31-68 Gy). The median PFS and OS from the date of first relapse were 16 (12-19) and 28 months (2-108), respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients. No patient- or treatment-related factor was identified as predictive of OS on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of potentially radical doses of radiation, including reirradiation at locoregional or distant oligorelapse or metastasis, is associated with encouraging PFS and OS in patients with cervical cancer.

Serial Bone Density Changes in Women Undergoing Pelvic (Chemo) Radiation: Results From the PARCER Trial.

PURPOSE: Pelvic irradiation leads to substantial dose to the pelvic girdle. However, bone density loss as a function of radiation therapy dose and time has not been investigated. This study was undertaken to evaluate such a dose-response relationship. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy for cervix cancer within a phase 3 trial were included. The study necessitated 2 computed tomography imaging sets acquired at least 12 months apart in patients with no evidence of relapse. All images were transferred to the treatment planning system to determine radiation dose and Hounsfield unit (HU). Across the entire lumbopelvic region (lumbar 1-5 [L1-5] vertebrae, pubic symphysis, femur, acetabulum, greater trochanter, and anterior-superior iliac spine) multiple regions were defined to measure radiation therapy dose and HU. Bone health was categorized as normal if >130 HU, osteopenic at 110 to 130 HU, and osteoporotic <110 HU at baseline and follow-up. Univariate analysis was performed to test the effect of various factors on HU. Further interaction among radiation therapy dose, time, and HU was assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Overall, 132 of 300 patients were eligible. The median age was 49 (42-56) years. With a prescription dose of 50 Gy, the L1 and L2 vertebrae received a median dose of 1.2 and 4 Gy, respectively, and L3-5 received 10 to 50 Gy. At 24 months, median HU loss at L4-5 was 45 HU (interquartile range, 34-77 HU). Out of the 132 patients, at baseline 96% had normal bone health. However, at the last follow-up, 3% of patients had normal bone health, 12% developed osteopenia, and 85% developed osteoporosis (P < .001). There were no patient- or treatment-related factors predicted for HU loss on univariate analysis. HU loss >60 to 70 was observed at >45 Gy at L5 vertebra (60-70 HU, P < .02) and >15 Gy at L4 vertebra (33 HU; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-response relationship is observed between radiation dose and bone mineral density loss. Prospective studies are needed to corroborate these observations and design future interventions.

Dose Accumulation for Multicourse Gynecological Reirradiation: A Methodological Narrative and Clinical Examples.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation (re-RT) is a suitable and potentially curative treatment option for in-field locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. Lack of clear guidelines on prescription, dose-response relationship, and clinical outcomes limits its clinical use. This clinical narrative describes the methodology for integration of deformable image registration (DIR) for cumulative dose assessment in the setting of re-RT for gynecologic malignancies, using the tools available within a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients who received re-RT for locoregional recurrence or second cancer within previously irradiated areas for a gynecologic primary were identified. Patient-specific DIR for deformable dose mapping and accumulation was retrospectively performed using intensity-based algorithm provided by the Varian Medical Systems Velocity AI version 4.1. Cumulative equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) delivered to overlapping targets and organs at risk were generated and compared with the physically summated doses. For both approaches, brachytherapy (BT) component was physically summated in cases where the BT applicator caused significant anatomic distortion. RESULTS: The mean maximum cumulative overlapping target dose was 119.4 Gy10 (range, 84.7 Gy10-144.9 Gy10). The mean cumulative doses received by 2 cm3 of bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel were 114.6 Gy3 (101.1-133.4 Gy3), 98.7 Gy3 (67-136.2 Gy3), 92.5 Gy3 (70.4-107 Gy3), and 89.9 Gy3 (81.1-102.8 Gy3), respectively. In the setting of in-field nodal recurrence, DIR-based dose summation was associated with lower cumulative organs at risk doses than those estimated with physical summation, except in one case with a higher bowel dose. In cases where re-RT was given for local recurrence/second primary, variation in sigmoid doses was observed between the 2 dose-summation strategies across all 3 cases, but it was inconsistent with bladder, rectum, or the bowel. CONCLUSIONS: DIR-based dose accumulation can be used to guide re-RT planning and can provide clinically relevant information, especially in cases with nodal recurrences. Registration of BT data sets remain challenging and requires an individualized assessment when applying these algorithms to clinical practice.

Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer - Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.

Background and Purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based target definition in cervix brachytherapy is limited by its availability, logistics and financial implications, therefore, use of computed tomography (CT) and Trans Rectal UltraSonography (TRUS) has been explored. The current study evaluated the dosimetric impact of CT + TRUS based target volumes as compared to gold standard MRI. Methods and Materials: Images of patients (n = 21) who underwent TRUS followed by MRI and CT, were delineated with High-Risk Clinical Target Volume in CT (CTVHR-CT) and in MRI (CTVHR-MR). CTVHR-CT was drawn on CT images with TRUS assistance. For each patient, two treatment plans were made, on MRI and CT, followed by fusion and transfer of CTVHR-MR to the CT images, referred as CTVHR-MRonCT. The agreement between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was evaluated for dosimetric parameters (D90, D98 and D50; Dose received by 90%, 98% and 50% of the volumes) using Bland-Altman plots, linear regression, and Pearson correlation. Results: No statistically significant systematic difference was found between MRI and CT. Mean difference (±1.96 SD) of D90, D98 and D50 between CTVHR-MRonCT and CTVHR-CT was 2.0, 1.2 and 5.6 Gy respectively. The number of patients who have met the dose constraints of D90 > 85 Gy were 90% and 80% in MR and in CT respectively, others were in the borderline, with a minimum dose of 80 Gy. The mean ± SD dose-difference between MR and CT plans for bladder was significant (5 ± 13 Gy; p = 0.12) for D0.1cm3, while others were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: CT + TRUS based delineation of CTVHR appear promising, provide useful information to optimally utilize for brachytherapy planning, however, MRI remains the gold standard.

Development and clinical validation of Knowledge-based planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of cervical cancer including pelvic and para aortic fields.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is based on a model to estimate dose-volume histograms, configured using a library of historical treatment plans to efficiently create high quality plans. The aim was to report configuration and validation of KBP for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A KBP model was configured from the institutional database (n = 125), including lymph node positive (n = 60) and negative (n = 65) patients. KBP Predicted plans were compared with Clinical Plans (CP) and Re-plans (Predicted plan as a base-plan) to validate the model. Model quality was quantified using coefficient of determination R2, mean square error (MSE), standard two-tailed paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Estimation capability of the model was good for the bowel bag (MSE = 0.001, R2 = 0.84), modest for the bladder (MSE = 0.008) and poor for the rectum (MSE = 0.02 R2 = 0.78). KBP resulted in comparable target coverage, superior organ sparing as compared to CP. Re-plans outperformed CP for the bladder, V30 (66 ± 11% vs 74 ± 11%, p < .001), V40 (48 ± 14% vs 52 ± 14%, p < .001), however sparing was modest for the bowel bag V30 (413 ± 191cm3 vs 445 ± 208cm3, p = .037) V40 (199 ± 105cm3 vs 218 ± 127cm3, p = .031). All plans were comparable for rectum, while KBP resulted in significant sparing for spinal cord, kidneys and femoral heads. CONCLUSION: KBP yielded comparable and for some organs superior performance compared to CP resulting in conformal and homogeneous target coverage. Improved organ sparing was observed when individual patient geometry was considered.