Age as a predictive factor for in-patient admission following day-case shoulder arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression - a district general hospital audit.

INTRODUCTION: Admission following day-case surgery can be problematic for both the patient and the health service. The purpose of this study was to identify any factors predictive of admission following arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression (ASAD) of the shoulder planned as day-case procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A postal questionnaire provided data for 27 patients undergoing ASAD as a day-case procedure between June 2002 and June 2004. RESULTS: Eighteen (66.7%) questionnaires were returned. Of respondents, 38.9% (mean age, 58 years) felt the procedure required in-patient admission due to postoperative pain. These patients had an older mean age than those (61.1%) content with a day-case procedure (mean age, 49 years; P = 0.04). Of patients 55 years and older, 67% felt that the procedure should have an in-patient admission due to postoperative pain compared to 11% of patients under the age of 55 years (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patient age may be useful as a predictor of the likelihood of postoperative admission for pain control following day-case shoulder surgery and should be taken into account when planning day case lists.

Use of the Abbreviated Mental Test Score by junior doctors on patients with fractured neck of femur.

INTRODUCTION: The mental state of patients with fractured neck of femur is important as a predictor of post-operative outcome. The Hodgkinson Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) is a validated and simple method of assessing the pre-operative mental state of patients with fractured neck of femur. This survey investigated whether or not orthopaedic junior doctors (SHOs) appreciated the importance of mental state assessment in patients with fractured neck of femur and whether they were able to recall the questions used in the AMTS. METHOD: A total of 47 on-call orthopaedic and trauma SHOs from the UK were randomly contacted by telephone and agreed to answer questions from a standard questionnaire to assess awareness of the ten-question AMTS. RESULTS: A total of 96% of SHOs claimed awareness of the importance of mental state assessment; 89% used the AMTS in their practice, of which 26% were aided by a pro forma. A mean of five (out of the ten) standard questions on the AMTS were correctly identified (95% CI = 0.68); 11% correctly identified all 10 questions. There was no correlation between use of a pro forma and correct identification of questions. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fractured neck of femur and low AMTS have higher morbidity and mortality. If the AMTS is to be used as an assessment tool in this setting, then SHOs need to be better informed and educated as to its use. Furthermore, the validity of data collection for research and audit purposes is potentially flawed; as data collected using such scoring systems may be inaccurate.

Learning curves in orthopaedic surgery: a case for super-specialisation?

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess if there is a significant learning curve in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We followed up cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by a single surgeon over a 12-year period. There were 96 cases, 56 treated by open reduction and 40 treated by closed reduction. Assessment was made of the incidence and degree of avascular necrosis in the treated hips, as a radiological outcome measure. RESULTS: Plotting the cumulative percentage of satisfactory outcomes demonstrated an increasingly high percentage of satisfactory results with increasing number of procedures performed, i.e. as the surgeon progressed up the 'learning curve'. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a learning curve in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. It may be possible to draw parallels to other treatments, and also support for the growing trend to specialisation.