Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Blood Res ; 12(4): 156-162, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147607

RESUMO

Avascular necrosis (AVN) is a critical health condition associated with local death of the bone tissue resulting in multifocal osteonecrosis (MFON). After a prior patient's consent, we present a case of sickle cell anemia associated with severe MFON that affected both long bones and short bones. She had a positive history of DVT. Initially, she presented with generalized severe bone pain with fever for seven days that got worse on the day of admission, a picture suggestive of sickle cell anemia-induced vaso-occlusive crisis. She was treated with adequate hydration, morphine, enoxaparin (a low molecular weight heparin), paracetamol and ceftriaxone. She got improved on treatment. On 5th day after admission, she developed sudden severe local tenderness at the distal tibia above the medial malleoli in both legs and she was unable to put a weight on her feet and could not stand up or walk. Plain X-ray films were not diagnostic. Complete liver function tests and kidney function tests were normal. The patient had leukocytosis, high serum urate and high serum LDH (may reflect cellular damage in bone cells). MRI scans revealed an evidence of bilateral multiple avascular necrosis in both femoral heads, left shoulder, left knee, and pelvic bones were evident. The patient's condition was evaluated and the diagnosis of MFON associated with sickle cell crisis was established. This patient responded well to same treatments and her condition got improved. In conclusion, MFON should be considered after vaso-occlusive crisis of sickle cell anemia. Plain X-ray is non-conclusive in diagnosing bony lesions induced by AVN while MRI is diagnostic.

2.
Ann Saudi Med ; 42(4): 246-251, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35933611

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the occurrence of coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19), the global community has witnessed its exponential spread with devastating outcomes within the general population and specifically within hemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVES: Compare the state of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 among hemodialysis patients and staff. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with a prospective follow-up period. SETTING: Hemodialysis centers in Madinah region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in dialysis patients using dialysis centers staff as controls. The participants were tested on four occasions when feasible for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also analyzed factors that might be associated with seropositivity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SARS-CoV-2 positivity using immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels SAMPLE SIZE: 830 participants, 677 patients and 153 dialysis centers staff as controls. RESULTS: Of the total participants, 325 (257 patients and 68 staff) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, for a prevalence of 38.0% and 44.4% among patients and staff, respectively (P=.1379). Participants with a history of COVID-19 or related symptoms were more likely to have positive IgG (P<.0001). Surprisingly, positivity was also center-dependent. In a multivariable logistic regression, a history of infection and related symptoms contributed significantly to developing immunity. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody among hemodialysis patients and previously asymptomatic staff suggested past asymptomatic infection. Some centers showed more immunity effects than others. LIMITATIONS: Unable to collect four samples for each participant; limited to one urban center. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Diálise Renal
3.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10285, 2020 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33047077

RESUMO

Background The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been spreading rapidly across the world. A nucleic acid real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) test of nasopharyngeal samples is the standard method for the diagnosis of an active SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, many limitations of the RQ-PCR tests make them unsuitable for the simple and rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 patients. Moreover, some individuals with COVID-19 present an asymptomatic infection. Thus, assessing the asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19, especially in healthcare workers (HCWs), is crucial for evaluating the efficiency of the current preventive measures. Serological tests such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are needed to quickly identify a large number of asymptomatic carriers to prevent the further spread of the virus and assess level of possible serological immunity in a community. Method Between April 18 and June 17, 2020, 330 HCWs from five Madinah region-affiliated hospitals underwent a seroprevalence screening for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin [Ig]M/IgA and IgG) using indirect ELISA testing. Result Among the 330 samples, 80 (24.24%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgA and/or IgG antibodies. There were no significant differences observed in the seroprevalence among the different occupations of the HCWs (excluding the pharmacists) with respect to the percentage of their seropositive samples. Conclusion The current study presented the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgA and IgG antibodies in HCWs. The regular screening of HCWs for these antibodies is necessary; subsequently, a molecular test is recommended for those with seropositive (IgM, IgA, and IgG) samples to assess their viral load and potential shedding.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...