Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.

The objective of this study was to determine if any significant differences existed with regard to dental and skeletal asymmetries between subjects with Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions and subjects with normal occlusions. The sample consisted of 30 subjects in each of the 2 groups. Each possessed a full complement of permanent teeth, including first molars. The average age of subjects was 15.76 years in the Class II subdivision group and 22.42 years in the normal occlusion group. Measurements were obtained with the use of submentovertex, posteroanterior, and corrected oblique cephalometric radiographs. In the submentovertex radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides in both anteroposterior and transverse dimensions. Coordinate systems were used to represent the mandible, cranial floor, and the maxilla. In the posteroanterior radiographs, symmetry was assessed similarly by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides. In the corrected oblique radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the differences in size of dental and skeletal structures between the right and the left sides. Variables were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the primary contributor to the differences between the 2 groups was the distal positioning of the mandibular first molars on the Class II side in patients whose mandibles showed no unusual skeletal or positional asymmetries. A secondary contributor was the mesial positioning of the maxillary first molars on the Class II side. Furthermore, the posteroanterior radiographic analysis showed that the more frequent distal positioning of the mandibular molars on the Class II side, compared with the mesial positioning of the maxillary molars on that side resulted in mandibular dental midline deviation to the Class II side more frequently than the maxillary dental midline to the opposite side.

A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with 3 different fixed appliance techniques.

Apical root resorption is an undesirable, but frequent side effect of orthodontic treatment, and therefore improvements in orthodontic techniques and materials are in constant development to decrease it. One of the most recently developed orthodontic techniques is the Bioefficient Therapy that uses contemporary orthodontic materials. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the amount of root resorption after orthodontic treatment between the simplified standard edgewise technique (group 1), the edgewise straight wire system (group 2), and the Bioefficient Therapy (group 3). It was also the purpose of this investigation to evaluate the amount of root resorption in the whole sample studied and the prevalence of root resorption in the upper and lower incisors. Thus, periapical radiographs were obtained with the long cone paralleling technique for the upper and lower incisors from 30 patients for each group. Root resorption was ranked by scores by 2 examiners who had an excellent intra and interexaminer calibration by Kendall concordance coefficient. Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that group 3 (Bioefficient Therapy) presented less root resorption than the others. It was speculated that the factors responsible for the lesser resorption in this technique were the use of heat-activated and superelastic wires with the bracket design in this technique as well as the use of a smaller rectangular stainless steel wire (0.018 x 0.025 inch) in a 0.022 x 0.028 inch slot during incisor retraction and the finishing stages, as compared to the other techniques. Considering the whole sample, there was no root resorption in 2.25% of the analyzed teeth. There was only a slight resorption in 42.56%, a moderate resorption in 53.37%, an accentuated resorption in 1.40% and an extreme root resorption in only 0.42% of the teeth. The prevalence of resorption for each incisor indicated, in decreasing order, a greater resorption for the upper centrals, followed by the upper laterals, lower centrals, and lastly the lower lateral incisors.

Eruption Guidance Appliance effects in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.

The objective of this research was to cephalometrically evaluate the possible effects of the Eruption Guidance Appliance on the craniofacial complex in a sample of 30 patients, over a treatment period of 26 months. The experimental sample consisted of 30 patients (13 females and 17 males), 27 of which presented with a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion and 3 with a Class I malocclusion. The mean initial chronologic age was 9 years; the treatment period lasted 26 months. A control group was used for comparison and consisted of 30 subjects (13 females and 17 males) of similar ages and spanned a similar observation period. Twenty-six subjects of this control group had Class II, Division 1 malocclusions, and 4 had Class I malocclusions. Lateral cephalometric headplates were obtained for the experimental group initially and after 26 months of treatment. The subjects in the control group were randomly selected from a serial growth study sample from the Orthodontic Department at Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, for whom cephalometric headplates were obtained annually from 4 to 18 years of age. Comparative statistics were used to assess possible differences between the experimental and control groups during the 26-month period of observation. Results demonstrated statistically significant increases in mandibular growth, degree of mandibular protrusion, lower anterior and total anterior face height, mesial migration of the lower molars, and mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height. There was also lingual tipping and retrusion of the upper incisors, linear protrusion of the lower incisors, improvement in the maxillomandibular relationship and in molar relationship, as well as a significant decrease in the overjet and overbite and an inhibition of the vertical development of the upper incisors. The study demonstrated no significant changes in maxillary growth during the evaluation period. It was concluded from these results that the effects of the Eruption Guidance Appliance during this time period were mostly dentoalveolar, with a smaller, but significant, skeletal effect.

Nickel hypersensitivity reaction before, during, and after orthodontic therapy.

Nickel is a strong biological sensitizer and consequently may induce a delayed hypersensitivity reaction (type IV immune response). Because nickel is a component of the majority of the orthodontic alloys, the objectives of this cross-sectional study were to determine the prevalence of nickel hypersensitivity reaction before, during, and after orthodontic therapy with conventional stainless steel brackets and wires; to evidence the induction of this reaction by the orthodontic appliances; and to characterize the nickel hypersensitive persons. Nickel patch tests and a questionnaire were used to evaluate the hypersensitivity to this metal. The total sample consisted of 170 patients, 105 females and 65 males, from the orthodontic department at Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. They were divided into three groups as follows: A (n = 60), patients before the beginning of orthodontic therapy; B (n = 66), patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment, and C (n = 44), patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment previously. The chi-square test (chi2) showed an allergic reaction in 28.3% of the total sample with 23% female and 5.3% male. This indicated a gender difference (chi2 = 10.75, p < 0.001). There was a positive association between nickel hypersensitivity and previous personal allergic history to metals (chi2 = 34.88, p < 0.0001) as well as with the daily use of metal objects (chi2 = 11.95, p < 0.0005). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of contact dermatitis among the three groups (chi2 = 0.39, p = 0.848). This suggests that orthodontic therapy with conventional stainless steel appliances does not initiate or aggravate a nickel hypersensitivity reaction.

Dental maturation in subjects with extreme vertical facial types.

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether there is a difference in dental maturation between skeletal open bite and skeletal deep bite subjects of the same chronological age. The material consisted of 40 lateral headfilms and 40 panoramic radiographs of 20 male and 20 female white subjects, with a mean chronological age of 9 years and 2 months (range: 7 years 6 months to 10 years 11 months). These subjects were selected on the basis of lower anterior face height as a percentage of total face height and on the amount of open or deep-bite from a total sample of 400 subjects. The persons exhibiting the most extreme values at both ends of the distribution were selected to create two groups with 20 subjects in each (10 males and 10 females). Thus, the groups represented subjects with either a large lower anterior face height associated with an open bite or a small lower anterior face height associated with a deep bite. A double blind determination of dental maturation, expressed by dental age, for each subject was performed on the panoramic radiographs using the system of Demirjian et al. (1973). A covariance analysis was used to eliminate variability introduced by the large age range of the sample. The skeletal open bite and deep bite groups presented mean dental ages of 120.48 and 114.00 months, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated that this difference was statistically significant at P < 0.05. Therefore, it seems that skeletal open bite subjects presented a slight tendency to have an advanced dental maturation, expressed by dental age, as compared with skeletal deep bite subjects.

Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.

Maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimensions were evaluated in subjects who had excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face height in relation to upper face height. Sexual dimorphism was also investigated. The dentoalveolar heights were compared between Class I and Class II, dental and skeletal malocclusions. The sample was drawn from the Burlington Growth Centre sample and consisted of 188 male and 156 female subjects at age 12 years, for whom lateral head films were available. This sample was classified into excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face height, using the ratio upper anterior face height/lower anterior face height (UAFH/LAFH). The results showed that the dentoalveolar heights are significantly different between faces with excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face heights, except for the lower posterior dental height, which showed no difference between short and normal lower anterior face height subjects. All dentoalveolar heights are larger for male subjects except for the upper posterior dental height. Dentoalveolar heights are similar between Class I and Class II dental and skeletal malocclusions. The upper teeth present a higher correlation to the UAFH/LAFH ratio than the lower teeth. Stepwise regression analysis shows that 22% of the variation in the ratio is explained by the maxillary and mandibular molars and 41% is explained by the maxillary and mandibular incisors.