Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Euro Surveill ; 24(28)2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31311618

RESUMO

IntroductionSequence-based typing of hepatitis A virus (HAV) is important for outbreak detection, investigation and surveillance. In 2013, sequencing was central to resolving a large European Union (EU)-wide outbreak related to frozen berries. However, as the sequenced HAV genome regions were only partly comparable between countries, results were not always conclusive.AimThe objective was to gather information on HAV surveillance and sequencing in EU/European Economic Area (EEA) countries to find ways to harmonise their procedures, for improvement of cross-border outbreak responses.MethodsIn 2014, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) conducted a survey on HAV surveillance practices in EU/EEA countries. The survey enquired whether a referral system for confirming primary diagnostics of hepatitis A existed as well as a central collection/storage of hepatitis A cases' samples for typing. Questions on HAV sequencing procedures were also asked. Based on the results, an expert consultation proposed harmonised procedures for cross-border outbreak response, in particular regarding sequencing. In 2016, a follow-up survey assessed uptake of suggested methods.ResultsOf 31 EU/EEA countries, 23 (2014) and 27 (2016) participated. Numbers of countries with central collection and storage of HAV positive samples and of those performing sequencing increased from 12 to 15 and 12 to 14 respectively in 2016, with all countries typing an overlapping fragment of 218 nt. However, variation existed in the sequenced genomic regions and their lengths.ConclusionsWhile HAV sequences in EU/EEA countries are comparable for surveillance, collaboration in sharing and comparing these can be further strengthened.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Hepatite A/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite A/diagnóstico , Tipagem Molecular/métodos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , União Europeia , Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Vírus da Hepatite A/genética , Humanos , RNA Viral/análise , Análise de Sequência de DNA
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(6): 1101-1109, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107215

RESUMO

We estimated the economic impact of concurrent measles and rubella outbreaks in Romania during 2011-2012. We collected costs from surveys of 428 case-patients and caretakers, government records, and health staff interviews. We then estimated financial and opportunity costs. During the study period, 12,427 measles cases and 24,627 rubella cases were recorded; 27 infants had congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). The cost of the outbreaks was US $9.9 million. Cost per case was US $439 for measles, US $132 for rubella, and US $44,051 for CRS. Up to 36% of households needed to borrow money to pay for illness treatment. Approximately 17% of patients continued to work while ill to pay their treatment expenses. Our key study findings were that households incurred a high economic burden compared with their incomes, the health sector bore most costs, and CRS costs were substantial and relevant to include in rubella outbreak cost studies.


Assuntos
Coinfecção , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Surtos de Doenças , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Sarampo/história , Sarampo/virologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Romênia/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/história , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/virologia , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/virologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos
3.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 18(7): 769-778, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793823

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cystic echinococcosis is a neglected zoonotic infection that is distributed worldwide and prioritised by WHO for control efforts. The burden of human cystic echinococcosis is poorly understood in most endemic regions, including eastern Europe. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of abdominal cystic echinococcosis in rural areas of Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. METHODS: We did a cross-sectional ultrasound-based survey that recruited volunteers from 50 villages in rural areas of Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. These villages were in provinces with annual hospital incidence of cystic echinococcosis within the mid-range for the respective countries. All people who attended a session were allowed to participate if they agreed to be screened. Abdominal ultrasound screening sessions were hosted in public community structures such as community halls, primary health-care centres, schools, and mosques. Lesions were classified using an adapted WHO classification. We reported the prevalence of abdominal cystic echinococcosis adjusted by sex and age through direct standardisation, using the country's rural population as a reference. FINDINGS: From July 1, 2014, to Aug 3, 2015, 24 693 individuals presented to screening sessions and 24 687 underwent ultrasound screening. We excluded a further six indivduals due to missing data, leaving 24 681 people in our analysis. Abdominal cystic echinococcosis was detected in 31 of 8602 people screened in Bulgaria, 35 of 7461 screened in Romania, and 53 of 8618 screened in Turkey. The age and sex adjusted prevalence of abdominal cystic echinococcosis was 0·41% (95% CI 0·29-0·58) in Bulgaria, 0·41% (0·26-0·65) in Romania, and 0·59% (0·19-1·85) in Turkey. Active cysts were found in people of all ages, including children, and in all investigated provinces. INTERPRETATION: Our results provide population-based estimates of the prevalence of abdominal cystic echinococcosis. These findings should be useful to support the planning of cost-effective interventions, supporting the WHO roadmap for cystic echinococcosis control. FUNDING: European Union Seventh Framework Programme.


Assuntos
Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Equinococose/diagnóstico por imagem , Equinococose/epidemiologia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Zoonoses/epidemiologia , Animais , Bulgária/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Romênia/epidemiologia , Turquia/epidemiologia , Ultrassonografia
4.
Euro Surveill ; 21(38)2016 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27684329

RESUMO

We describe a rubella outbreak that occurred in Romania between September 2011 and December 2012. During this period 24,627 rubella cases, 41.1% (n=10,134) of which female, were notified based on clinical criteria, and a total of 6,182 individuals were found serologically positive for IgM-specific rubella antibody. The median age of notified cases was 18 years (range: <1-65) and the most affected age group 15 to 19 years (n=16,245 cases). Of all notified cases, 24,067 cases (97.7%) reported no history of vaccination. Phylogenetic analysis of 19 sequences (739 nucleotides each), from 10 districts of the country revealed that the outbreak was caused by two distinct rubella virus strains of genotype 2B, which co-circulated with both temporal and geographical overlap. In addition to the 6,182 IgM-positive rubella cases, 28 cases of congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) were identified, including 11 neonatal deaths and one stillbirth. The outbreak underscores the need to encourage higher vaccination uptake in the population, particularly in women of reproductive age, and to strengthen epidemiological and laboratory investigations of suspected rubella cases. Genetic characterisation of wild-type rubella virus is an essential component to enhance surveillance and here we report rubella virus sequences from Romania.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Vírus da Rubéola/genética , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Notificação de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filogenia , Vigilância da População , Romênia/epidemiologia , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Rubéola/isolamento & purificação , Distribuição por Sexo , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 25(1): 25-32, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27014751

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The most recent prevalence data for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Romania came from an ESEN 2 study (2002), and from a Romanian population-based study performed in 2008. Most of the previous studies were regional and performed in specific groups (blood donors, pregnant women, institutionalized people, etc) and had limited representativeness at the national level, both for HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The scarcity of prevalence data for HBV and HCV infection coming from the routine surveillance was also considered. The aim of our study was to obtain overall and age group specific estimates of the prevalence of HBV and HCV infections markers in Romania, in order to recommend evidence-based public health interventions. The main outcome was the proportion of persons with HBV, HCV and HBV+HCV infection markers, overall and by age group and gender. METHODS: Our seroprevalence study ensured national representativeness for the targeted hospitalized population. A prospective collection of serum samples in hospital laboratories was completed between September and November 2013, using a systematic sampling. The study respected the confidentiality of personal data. We calculated the sample size using EpiInfo7 and used Z test - Two-tailed probability for statistical significance. RESULTS: The overall prevalence data estimated in our study were HBc Ab 28%, HBs Ag 4.2%, HBs Ab regardless of titer 64.1%, HBs Ab in titer of at least 10 mUI/ml and negative HBc Ab 17.5%; HCV Ab 5.6%; HBc Ab and HCV Ab 2.8%, as markers of double infection. CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence data estimated in our study for HBs Ag (4.2%) and HCV Ab (5.6%) correspond to a medium endemicity based on the WHO criteria. The estimated prevalence of HBV and HCV infection markers in the study population should represent an opportunity for a better national prevention and control strategy.


Assuntos
Coinfecção , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pacientes Internados , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/imunologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Romênia/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Testes Sorológicos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...