Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 104: 71-80, 2023 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454900

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Life-long follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is costly and burdensome to the patient. Follow-up should be stratified based on the risk of EVAR failure. Aneurysm neck is thought to be the single most important risk factor. This study investigated neck anatomy as a predictor of neck-related adverse events after EVAR. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included consecutive patients undergoing elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between 2011 and 2016 (n = 222) who were followed with yearly imaging until December 2020. Hostile neck was defined as neck length ≤15 mm, width ≥28 mm, angulation ≥60°, calcification, or thrombus ≥50% of circumference or conical neck based on preoperative computed tomography angiography. Neck-related adverse event was defined as aneurysm rupture, any neck-related reintervention or type 1a endoleak during follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety (41%) patients had hostile neck and 132 (59%) had friendly neck. There were no differences in 30-day mortality (1% vs. 1%, P = 0.78), major adverse events (20% vs. 16%, P = 0.43) or reinterventions during the hospital stay (8% vs. 4%, P = 0.20) between patients with hostile and friendly neck. Estimated survival at 1 year was 89 ± 3% for hostile neck and 95 ± 2% for friendly neck patients (P < 0.01). Five-year survival estimates were 51 ± 6% and 66 ± 4%, respectively. Aneurysm-related mortality was higher after 6 years in patients with hostile neck (P < 0.01). Twenty-four patients (11%) suffered neck-related adverse events with mean time-to-event of 3.3 ± 2.8 years; there were no differences between the groups stratified by neck anatomy. Incidentally, preoperative aneurysm diameter was found to be an independent risk factor for neck-related adverse events and aneurysm-related mortality; 53 patients (24%) had aneurysm diameter ≥70 mm, which was associated with nearly 4-fold risk of neck-related complications during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Friendly neck anatomy may not protect from neck-related adverse events after EVAR in the long-term. Especially patients with large aneurysms should be followed closely.

2.
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra ; 4(2): 122-31, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25076957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cerebral white matter lesions (WMLs) predict long-term survival of conservatively treated acute stroke patients with etiology other than carotid stenosis. In carotid endarterectomy patients, WMLs are associated with severe carotid stenosis and unstable plaques, with the risk of perioperative complications and with increased 30-day perioperative risk of death. However, no data exist on their effect on postoperative long-term survival, a factor important when considering the net benefit from carotid endarterectomy. Whether this effect is independent of classical risk factors and indications for surgery is not known either. We hypothesized that WMLs could be evaluated from preoperative routine computed tomography (CT) scans and are predictors of postoperative survival, independent of classical cardiovascular risk factors, indication category and degree of carotid stenosis. METHODS: A total of 353 of 481 (73.4%) consecutive patients subjected to carotid endarterectomy due to different indications, i.e. asymptomatic stenosis (n = 28, 7.9%), amaurosis fugax (n = 52, 14.7%), transient ischemic attack (n = 135, 38.2%) or ischemic stroke (n = 138, 39.1%), from prospective vascular registries during the years 2001-2010 with digital preoperative CT scans, were included in the study. WMLs were rated by a radiologist (Wahlund criteria) in a blinded fashion. Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses were angiographically graded (<50, 50-69, 70-99 and 100%). Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) are reported (ORs and HRs ≤1 indicate a beneficial effect). The median follow-up time was 67 months (interquartile range 45.5, range 0-129 months). Spearman's rho was used to estimate intraobserver agreement. Binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the association of risk factors with WMLs. Cox regression proportional hazards analysis was used to study the effect of different factors on survival. RESULTS: WML severity could be assessed with a substantial intraobserver agreement (Spearman's rho 0.843, p < 0.0001). Only age (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15; p < 0.0001 per year), degree of ipsilateral ICA stenosis (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.08-4.55; p < 0.05 per stenosis grade) and indication category (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19-2.24; p < 0.01 per category) remained independently associated with WMLs. Age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p < 0.05 per year), diabetes (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.49; p < 0.05), peripheral arterial disease (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.46-4.15; p < 0.01), degree of ipsilateral ICA stenosis (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.12-5.87; p < 0.05 per stenosis grade) and WMLs (HR 3.83, 95% CI 1.17-12.5; p < 0.05) remained independently associated with increased long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: WMLs in a preoperative CT scan provide a substantially reliable estimate of postoperative long-term survival of carotid endarterectomy patients independent of currently used criteria, i.e. cardiovascular risk factors, indication category and degree of ipsilateral ICA stenosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...