Correction: Validation of a Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Do moderate psychometric properties affect its clinical utility?

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249211.].

Validation of a Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Do moderate psychometric properties affect its clinical utility?

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a validated tool for assessing the severity of stroke. It has been adapted into several languages; however, a Polish version with large-scale psychometric validation, including repeatability and separate assessments of anterior and posterior stroke, has not been developed. We aimed to adapt and validate a Polish version of the NIHSS (PL-NIHSS) while focusing on the psychometric properties and site of stroke. METHODS: The study included 225 patients with ischemic stroke (102 anterior and 123 posterior circulation stroke). Four NIHSS-certified researchers estimated stroke severity using the most appropriate scales to assess the psychometric properties (including internal consistency, homogeneity, scalability, and discriminatory power of individual items) and ultimately determine the reliability, repeatability, and validity of the PL-NIHSS. RESULTS: The PL-NIHSS achieved Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.6885, which indicates moderate internal consistency and homogeneity. Slightly more than half of the individual items provided sufficient discriminatory power (r > 0.3). A favorable coefficient of repeatability (0.6267; 95% confidence interval: 0.5737-0.6904), narrow limits of inter-rater agreement, and excellent intraclass correlation coefficients or weighted kappa values (> 0.90), demonstrated high reliability of PL-NIHSS. Highly significant correlations with other tools confirmed the validity and predictive value of the PL-NIHSS. In posterior stroke, the PL-NIHSS achieved the required Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.71070). Additionally, stroke location did not affect other psychometric features or instrument reliability and validity. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a valid and reliable tool for assessing stroke severity in Polish-speaking participants. Moderate psychometric features were emphasized without limiting its clinical applications.

Introducing Adam's Scale of Posterior Stroke (ASPOS): A Novel Validated Tool to Assess and Predict Posterior Circulation Strokes.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the severity of posterior circulation strokes, due to the variety of symptoms, is a significant clinical problem. Current clinimetric scales show lower accuracy in the measurement of posterior stroke severity, compared with that of anterior strokes. The aim of the study was to design a validated tool, termed Adam's Scale of Posterior Stroke (ASPOS), for better assessment and prediction of posterior stroke. METHODS: This prospective, observational study involved 126 posterior circulation ischemic stroke subjects. Four researchers, previously trained in ASPOS, randomized the stroke severity using a novel tool and other appropriate stroke scales (The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale-NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale-mRS, Glasgow Coma Scale, Barthel Index, or Israeli Vertebrobasilar Stroke Scale-IVBSS) to assess the psychometric properties, reliability, and validity of ASPOS and investigate its predictive value. RESULTS: ASPOS reached a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.7449, indicating good internal consistency. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a good coefficient of repeatability (CR) of 0.46, a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.41-0.53, and excellent intraclass correlation coefficients or weighted kappa values (>0.90), reflecting high reliability and reproducibility. Highly significant correlations with other scales confirmed the construct and predictive validity of ASPOS. A total ASPOS score of three points indicated a significantly increased probability of severe stroke based on the NIHSS, compared to a total ASPOS of 1-2 points (odds ratio (OR) 141; 95% CI: 6.72-2977.66; p = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel, valid, and reliable tool to assess posterior circulation strokes. This can contribute to a more comprehensive estimation of posterior stroke and, additionally, due to its predictive properties, it can be used to more accurately select candidates for specific treatments.

Validation of a Polish version of the Israeli Vertebrobasilar Stroke Scale - An attempt to more accurately assess posterior Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior circulation stroke, in contrast to anterior circulation stroke, has a greater complexity and variability of clinical symptoms. This could be responsible for delayed diagnosis and treatment time and, as a consequence, worse prognosis. Certain blame in this respect can also be attributed to the clinimetric scales used to assess stroke severity, which are characterized by significantly lower accuracy than with anterior strokes. The Israeli Vertebrobasilar Stroke Scale (IVBSS) was the first attempt dedicated to posterior strokes and was devised for better measurement of clinical condition. We aimed to develop a Polish version of the IVBSS (PL-IVBSS) to assess the reliability, validity and psychometric properties of the tool to confirm its clinical utility. METHODS: We enrolled 126 posterior circulation ischemic stroke subjects. Four researchers estimated stroke severity using appropriate and widely accepted devices (the modified Rankin Scale - mRS, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale - NIHSS, the Barthel Index, and the Glasgow Coma Scale - GCS) and compared with the PL-IVBSS. We analyzed inter- and intrarater agreements, repeatability, concurrent and predictive validity, internal consistency, scalability and homogeneity, reflecting the psychometric features of a validated instrument. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.67, and the median inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.22, indicating moderate internal consistency and insufficient homogeneity. A total of 63.6% of the individual items obtained required discriminatory power (r > 0.3), showing moderate scalability. The PL-IVBSS achieved a good coefficient of repeatability (CR = 1.21 95%CI 1.08-1.38) and narrow limits of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis, emphasizing the accuracy and high reproducibility. Excellent intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted kappa values (all >0.90) underlined the high reliability of the PL-IVBSS. Highly significant correlations with other relevant devices (all r > 0.5, p < 0.0001) highlighted the satisfactory concurrent and predictive validity of a validated clinimetric tool. CONCLUSION: We devised a validated version of the IVBSS, indicating the high reproducibility, repeatability and accuracy of the PL-IVBSS and confirming its clinical utility. Despite moderate psychometric properties, our findings support the need for its clinical application and widespread use in stroke units for a reliable assessment of posterior stroke severity.