Effect of external urinary collection device implementation on female surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common hospital-acquired infection. Female external urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may be an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters (IUCs), thereby decreasing CAUTIs. However, no study has demonstrated that EUCDs can help reduce CAUTIs in female surgical patients. We sought to compare CAUTI rate and the median number of days an IUC was used before and after availability of this female EUCD for surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult female surgical patients admitted to a single academic institution who received an IUC and/or EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC three months before (PRE) EUCD availability (08/2017-10/2017) were compared to patients receiving an IUC and/or EUCD 12 months after (POST) (11/2017-11/2018). RESULTS: From 906 surgical patients receiving an IUC/EUCD, 127 received an EUCD in the POST cohort. Compared to the PRE, the POST had a higher rate of CAUTIs (infections per 1000 catheter days, 11.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.017) and overall UTI rate (infections per 1000 catheter days, 5.4 vs. 4.8, p = 0.036), whereas IUC days were similar between cohorts (median, two vs. two days, p = 0.18). The POST cohort rate of EUCD UTI was 4.6 infections per 1000 device days. CONCLUSION: While EUCDs appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female surgical patients, this study found increased CAUTIs after introduction of an EUCD. Further research is needed to clarify if female EUCDs are effective in decreasing CAUTI prior to widespread adoption.

A single institution pre-/post-comparison after introduction of an external urinary collection device for female medical patients.

Background: External urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may serve as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) and decrease the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). PureWick® is a novel female EUCD; however, no study has definitively proven benefit regarding reduction of CAUTIs. Aim: We sought to compare the CAUTI rate and IUC days before and after availability of the PureWick® EUCD at a single institution. We provide a descriptive analysis of female medical patients receiving an EUCD. Methods: A retrospective review of adult female patients admitted to a single institution on a medical service who received an IUC and/or an EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC in the 3 months before EUCD availability (PRE) were compared to patients who received an IUC and/or EUCD in the 12 months after (POST). Results: Out of 848 female patients, 292 received an EUCD in the POST cohort and overall, 656 received an IUC (259 (100%) PRE vs. 397 (67.4%) POST). Compared to the PRE cohort, the POST cohort had a higher number of IUC days (median, 3 vs 2 days, p = 0.001) and a higher rate of CAUTI (infections per 1000 catheter days, 9.3 vs 2.3, p = 0.001). The rate of UTI associated with EUCD use was 9.8 infections per 1000 device days. Discussion: While EUCDs might appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female patients, this single center pre-/post-analysis found that both the number of IUC days and the CAUTI rate increased after introduction of a female EUCD.

Female pediatric and adolescent genitalia trauma: a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

PURPOSE: Pediatric genitalia injury represents 0.6% of all pediatric trauma. It is crucial for providers to understand whether pediatric patients are at risk for violent mechanisms, such as rape, assault, or other abuse. Therefore, we sought to perform a large database analysis of pediatric and adolescent female genitalia trauma, comparing mechanisms of injury (i.e., sexual abuse) and need for operative intervention between adolescent and pediatric cohorts. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried (years 2007-2015) for female patients ≤ 16 years old with external genitalia (vaginal or vulvar) trauma. Two groups were compared: pediatrics (< 12 years old) and adolescents (12-16 years old). RESULTS: Out of 303,992 female patients, 3206 (1.1%) were identified to have genitalia trauma with the majority being pediatric patients (92.1%) and with injury to the vagina (62.6%). Pediatric patients with vaginal injury were less likely to be victims of rape (4.1% vs. 17.3%, p < 0.001) and assault (2.1% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001) but more likely to be victims of other abuse (9.5% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.003). More of the adolescent patients with vaginal trauma required repair (58.7% vs. 43.2%, p < 0.001). Pediatric patients with injury to the vulva were less likely to be victims of rape (0.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.01) and motor vehicle accidents (4.2% vs. 11.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Genitalia trauma occurs in 1.1% of pediatric and adolescent trauma cases with the vagina being more commonly injured compared to the vulva. Adolescent patients with vaginal injuries were more likely to be victims of rape and assault and required repair more often, while those with vulvar injuries were more likely due to motor vehicle accidents. Health care providers must be aware of these at-risk populations and the differences between them to identify female victims of violence and provide resources to assist with recovery.

Simulated Mass Casualty Incident Triage Exercise for Training Medical Personnel.

Audience: The target audience is any medical professional who requires training in mass casualty incident (MCI) triage. This could apply to pre-hospital specialists, nurses, medical students, residents, and physicians. Introduction: Emergency medicine specialists must be able to triage patients quickly, especially in an MCI scenario. The simple triage and rapid treatment (START) system allows providers to categorize patients according to the urgency with which patients must access limited resources. Providers should be comfortable utilizing the START triage system before an MCI or disaster so that they can be prepared to implement it if necessary. This exercise uses simulation and gamification as instructional strategies to encourage knowledge of and comfort with the START triage system for emergency providers. Educational Objectives: By the end of this exercise, learners should be able to (1) recite the basic START patient categories (2) discuss the physical exam signs associated with each START category, (3) assign roles to medical providers in a mass casualty scenario, (4) accurately categorize patients into triage categories: green, yellow, red, and black, and (5) manage limited resources when demand exceeds availability. Educational Methods: Gamification is the use of elements of game design in non-game contexts.1 Gamification was implemented in this scenario by assigning participants to roles and teams, while creating an engaging, fun, and competitive environment. The exercise also uses low fidelity simulation (without simulation equipment) to encourage learners to practice using the START triage system in a low stakes environment.2 It is possible for the learners to be divided into two groups that each have the same patients, resources, and objectives. The team that finishes triaging all patients first would be declared the winner. However, in our implementation, we completed the exercise as a single group of learners and patients. Research Methods: Learners were given a survey at the end of implementation and also given the opportunity to discuss feedback with the instructors in a group discussion after completing the exercise. There was no formal assessment completed after the exercise. Results: Informal feedback was collected at the end of the exercise. Residents and medical students all enjoyed the experience. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive. All participants providing feedback stated they would enjoy participating in the exercise again and suggested that it is implemented annually for review of triage topics. We also received informal feedback for suggested changes which we will discuss in this article. An optional, anonymous survey was given to participants at the end of the exercise. There were six responses. Of those surveyed, 100% of participants stated the effectiveness and value of the exercise was outstanding (a rating of five on a scale of one to five). Regarding the quality of the exercise, and whether the participants felt engaged, 100% of responses gave a rating of five. When asked to consider the relevance of the session, 100% of participants selected a score of five ("I loved this session"). Regarding whether the content was applicable to practice of emergency medicine, 80% of respondents stated the session was highly relevant and 20% of responses selected a score of mostly relevant. One question asked for points of improvement for the session to which there were no responses. Discussion: Learners were assigned roles in the exercise by the incident commander, fulfilling objective three. The START categories were discussed at the beginning of the exercise by the lead proctor (using PowerPoint) and then utilized throughout the exercise, thus accomplishing objectives one and two. The residents/students filling the triage roles were primarily responsible for fulfilling objective four; however, all participants assisted in categorization of patients throughout the exercise. Finally, objective five was addressed through the various social situations and complications that can be implemented during the exercise. We chose not to implement the additional "radiation contamination" scenario (details available in the article text) due to time constraints; however, this is an additional option to address objective five. The implementation was effective based on informal feedback from participants and proctors as well as evidenced by the responses to the anonymous survey. Learners found the aspects of resource management, review of START triage, repetition of the START triage system, and medical management of various types of trauma informative and meaningful. We received valuable feedback from both learners and proctors, which we will discuss in this article. Topics: Mass casualty incident, disaster, START, gamification, simulation, emergency medicine, triage, triage category, contamination, teamwork, trauma, projectile trauma, penetrating injury, blunt trauma, intracranial hemorrhage, fracture, trauma in pregnancy, active shooter, radiation, radio communication.

Predictors of discharge against medical advice in adult trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients who leave against medical advice (AMA) have higher readmission rates and mortality. However, little is known about the characteristics of trauma patients that leave AMA. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for leaving AMA in adult trauma patients. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried between 2010 and 2016 for patients ≥18 years of age presenting after trauma. Two groups were compared: those who left AMA and those that did not. Bivariate analysis using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests was performed. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for leaving AMA. RESULTS: Of 1,403,466 trauma patients identified, 10,659 (0.76%) left AMA. Patients that left AMA were younger (median age, 48 vs. 53 years-old, p < 0.001), more often male (82.1% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001), more likely to be black (23.6% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001), and more likely to be uninsured (27.0% vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Patients leaving AMA were more likely to test positive for alcohol (36.1% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001) or drug use (36.0% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001) at time of admission. On multivariable logistic regression, the strongest predictors for leaving AMA were: no insurance (OR 2.00, CI 1.88-2.14, p < 0.001), alcohol use (OR 1.85, CI 1.74-1.96, p < 0.001) or drug use (OR 1.83, CI 1.72-1.94, p < 0.001), male gender (OR 1.83, CI 1.71-1.97, p < 0.001), and stab mechanism of injury (OR 1.58, CI 1.43-1.73, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In adult trauma patients, male gender, stab mechanism of injury, being uninsured, and alcohol/drug use were strong predictors of leaving AMA. The risk factors identified may help in developing strategies aimed at preventing trauma patients from leaving AMA.

No increased risk of acute osteomyelitis associated with closed or open long bone shaft fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Osteomyelitis of the long bones can result from hematogenous spread, direct inoculation or from a contiguous focus of infection. The association of osteomyelitis after long bone fractures has widely been believed to be true by practicing surgeons since the 1950s, even though the evidence has been poor. We hypothesized that long bone shaft fracture and major bone surgery are independent risk factors for osteomyelitis in adult trauma patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried between 2007 and 2015 for patients ≥18 years of age presenting after trauma. Patients with long bone shaft fractures (femur, tibia/fibula, humerus) were identified and rate of acute osteomyelitis was calculated. Univariable logistic regression was performed. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for development of acute osteomyelitis. RESULTS: From 5,494,609 patients, 358,406 were identified to have long bone shaft fractures (6.5%) with the majority being tibia/fibula (44.3%). The osteomyelitis rate in long bone shaft fractures was 0.05%. Independent risk factors for osteomyelitis included major humerus surgery and major tibia/fibula surgery. The strongest risk factor was non-pseudomonas bacteremia. Long bone shaft fractures were not found to be an independent risk factor for osteomyelitis (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Long bone shaft fractures are not independently associated with increased risk for osteomyelitis. Major extremity surgery on the humerus and tibia/fibula, but not femur, are independent risk factors for osteomyelitis. However, the strongest risk factor is non-pseudomonas bacteremia.