Perfil de eficacia y seguridad de Echinacea purpurea en la prevención de episodios de resfriado común: estudio clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego y controlado con placebo / Safety and efficacy profile of Echinacea purpurea to prevent common cold episodes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objetivo: Investigar la seguridad y la eficacia de un extracto de Echinacea purpurea en la prevención del resfriado común en una amplia población durante un período de 4 meses. Método: 755 sujetos sanos recibieron un extracto etanólico de E. purpurea(95% parte aérea florida y 5% de raíz) fresca o placebo. A los participantes se les solicitó registrar en un diario los acontecimientos adversos y evaluar los síntomas relacionados con el resfriado, durante todo el período del estudio. Se tomaron muestras de las secreciones nasales de los participantes que padecieron resfriados agudos y fueron examinadas en busca de virus. Resultados: Ocurrieron un total de 293 acontecimientos adversos en el grupo al que se le asignó la equinácea y 306 en el grupo placebo. El 9% de los participantes experimentó acontecimientos adversos, que se consideraron al menos posiblemente, relacionados con el extracto (reacciones adversas), frente al 10% en el grupo placebo. Por lo tanto, la seguridad de la equinácea no fue inferior a la del placebo. La equinácea redujo el número total de episodios de resfriados, los días acumulados de resfriado y los episodios comedicados con analgésicos y antiinflamatorios. Asimismo inhibió los resfriados virales confirmados por deteccion del virus y previno especialmente las infecciones de los virus con membrana (p<0,05) La equinácea demostró mayor eficacia en las infecciones recurrentes y los efectos preventivos aumentaron cuando se cumplió estrictamente con el tratamiento y con el protocolo. Conclusión: La toma profiláctica de E. purpurea durante un período de 4 meses proporcionó una relación beneficio/riesgo positiva (AU)

Objective: To investigate the safety (risk) and efficacy (benefit) of Echinacea purpurea extract in the prevention of common cold episodes in a large population over a 4-month period. Methods: 755 healthy subjects were allocated to receive either an alcohol extract from freshly harvested E. purpurea (95% herba and 5% root) or placebo. Participants were required to record adverse events and to rate cold-related issues in a diary throughout the investigation period. Nasal secretions were sampled at acute colds and screened for viruses. Results: A total of 293 adverse events occurred with Echinacea and 306 with placebo treatment. Nine and 10% of participants experienced adverse events, which were at least possibly related to the study drug (adverse drug reactions).Thus, the safety of Echinacea was noninferior to placebo. Echinacea reduced the total number of cold episodes, cumulated episode days within the group, and pain-killer medicated episodes. Echinacea inhibited virally confirmed colds and especially prevented enveloped virus infections (p < 0.05). Echinacea showed maximal effects on recurrent infections, and preventive effects increased with therapy compliance and adherence to the protocol. Conclusions: Compliant prophylactic intake of E. purpurea over a 4-month period appeared to provide a positive risk to benefit ratio (AU)

A double-blind, randomised, crossover study of two doses of a single-tablet combination of ibuprofen/paracetamol and placebo for primary dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy of pain relief may potentially be enhanced by combining two or more analgesics with different mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a novel single-tablet combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol compared with placebo in females experiencing moderate-to-severe pain due to primary dysmenorrhoea, a prevalent, recurrent condition characterised by pain at the time of menses. METHODS: This was a phase II/III, double-blind, randomised, cross-over, single-dose study in 94 women with moderate-to-severe dysmenorrhoea, examining the efficacy and tolerability of one or two tablets of a single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg compared with placebo. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN42521357 RESULTS: Total pain relief over 6 hours post-dose (TOTPAR(0-6h)) was significantly greater following administration of two tablets of the single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg compared with placebo (LS means: 2.35, 1.85, respectively; p = 0.0001) and approached significance for one tablet (LS mean: 2.10; p = 0.054). Statistically superior pain relief and reductions in pain intensity were achieved from 2 hours and 90 minutes post-dose, respectively, with the higher dose combination, and from 4 hours with the lower dose combination compared with placebo. Overall effectiveness (sum of pain intensity difference and pain relief score [SPRID] over 6 hours) were statistically superior to placebo for both one and two tablets of the ibuprofen/paracetamol combination (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.03, respectively). Both dose combinations were well-tolerated. Adverse events were minor and their frequency and nature did not differ with either treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: One or two tablets of a single-tablet combination of ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg is well-tolerated and provides superior analgesic efficacy to placebo in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea.

Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold.

BACKGROUND: The common cold, the most prevalent contagious viral disease in humans still lacks a safe and effective antiviral treatment. Iota-Carrageenan is broadly active against respiratory viruses in-vitro and has an excellent safety profile. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of an Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold symptoms. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory trial, 35 human subjects suffering from early symptoms of common cold received Iota-Carrageenan (0.12%) in a saline solution three times daily for 4 days, compared to placebo. RESULTS: Administration of Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray reduced the symptoms of common cold (p = 0.046) and the viral load in nasal lavages (p = 0.009) in patients with early symptoms of common cold. Pro-inflammatory mediators FGF-2, Fractalkine, GRO, G-CSF, IL-8, IL-1alpha, IP-10, IL-10, and IFN-alpha2 were reduced in the Iota-Carrageenan group. CONCLUSIONS: Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray appears to be a promising treatment for safe and effective treatment of early symptoms of common cold. Larger trials are indicated to confirm the results.

Efficacy and safety of single and multiple doses of pseudoephedrine in the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoephedrine (60 mg) is widely used as an oral decongestant taken in tablet or syrup formulations every 4-6 hours for the treatment of nasal congestion associated with common cold and allergy. However, there are relatively few studies in the literature that have used objective measures of nasal airway resistance (NAR) to assess the efficacy of pseudoephedrine, and most studies use only a single dose of medication. The present study has the aims of studying the safety and efficacy of a new pseudoephedrine formulation after single and multiple doses in patients with URTI. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted over three study days at a single center. Patients suffering from nasal congestion associated with common cold were recruited and total NAR was measured by the technique of posterior rhinomanometry. NAR and subjective scores of nasal congestion were measured at baseline and after dosing with study medication, every hour over a four-hour period on day 1 after a single dose, and on day 3 after multiple doses of medication. Subjective scores of congestion/stuffiness were also made as a summary score at the end of each day of treatment. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with nasal congestion associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), mean age 20 years, were recruited to the study and received treatment. After a single dose on day 1 the pseudoephedrine group had a statistically significant lower area under the NAR curve than placebo (p = 0.006) for the primary efficacy variable area under the NAR curve from 0-3 hours (NAR AUC 0-3h), and similarly for the secondary efficacy variable NAR AUC 0-4h (p = 0.001). On day three after multiple doses, the pseudoephedrine group had a statistically significant lower NAR AUC 0-3h and AUC 0-4h than placebo (p < 0.001), On day 1, the pseudoephedrine group had significantly lower subjective scores for congestion than placebo visual analog scale (VAS) AUC 0-3h (p = 0.029) and similarly for VAS AUC 0-4h (p = 0.021). On day 3, the differences in subjective scores were not significantly different. The mean decrease from baseline of the summary score for congestion/stuffiness over the duration of the study was greater in the pseudoephedrine group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.016). On average, heart rate was between two and four beats per minute greater in the pseudoephedrine group compared to placebo. Five adverse events were reported in both treatment groups and these were deemed to be unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that pseudoephedrine is a safe and effective treatment for nasal congestion associated with URTI. The results from the laboratory study on day 1 demonstrate by both objective and subjective measures of nasal congestion that a single dose of 60 mg pseudoephedrine is superior to placebo treatment. Support for the decongestant efficacy of multiple doses of pseudoephedrine is provided by objective measures on day 3 and subjective measures made over three days, but not by the VAS scores on day 3.

Effects of acetylsalicylic acid on sore throat pain and other pain symptoms associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection.

OBJECTIVE: Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been widely used for over a century to treat pain and fever associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), but there is a lack of clinical data to support the efficacy of ASA in this disease state. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ASA for the treatment of sore throat pain associated with URTI. DESIGN: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group design. Two hundred seventy-two patients (mean age: 25 years) with sore throat pain associated with URTI were recruited at two centers. Pain scores were made during a 2-hour laboratory phase and continued for secondary objectives during a 4-hour home phase. Patients were treated with either two effervescent tablets of ASA 400 mg in water or matched placebo tablets. Patients took medication as required over a 3-day home phase. RESULTS: ASA was found to be superior to placebo for: The primary efficacy parameter predefined in the protocol, reduction in sore throat pain intensity over 2 hours (P < 0.001), and for secondary efficacy parameters, reduction in sore throat pain intensity over 4 and 6 hours, relief of sore throat pain over 2, 4, and 6 hours, reduction in intensity of pain associated with headache, and reduction in muscle aches and pains over a 2-hour time period (P < 0.01). No safety problems were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ASA was shown to provide relief from sore throat pain, headache, and muscle aches and pains associated with URTI.