A comparison of healthy human and swine articular cartilage dynamic indentation mechanics.

Articular cartilage is a multicomponent, poroviscoelastic tissue with nonlinear mechanical properties vital to its function. A consequent goal of repair or replacement of injured cartilage is to achieve mechanical properties in the repair tissue similar to healthy native cartilage. Since fresh healthy human articular cartilage (HC) is not readily available, we tested whether swine cartilage (SC) could serve as a suitable substitute for mechanical comparisons. To a first approximation, cartilage tissue and surgical substitutes can be evaluated mechanically as viscoelastic materials. Stiffness measurements (dynamic modulus, loss angle) are vital to function and are also a non-destructive means of evaluation. Since viscoelastic material stiffness is strongly strain rate dependent, stiffness was tested under different loading conditions related to function. Stiffness of healthy HC and SC specimens was determined and compared using two non-destructive, mm-scale indentation test modes: fast impact and slow sinusoidal deformation. Deformation resistance (dynamic modulus) and energy handling (loss angle) were determined. For equivalent anatomic locations, there was no difference in dynamic modulus. However, the HC loss angle was ~35% lower in fast impact and ~12% higher in slow sinusoidal mode. Differences seem attributable to age (young SC, older HC) but also to species anatomy and biology. Test mode-related differences in human-swine loss angle support use of multiple function-related test modes. Keeping loss angle differences in mind, swine specimens could serve as a standard of comparison for mechanical evaluation of e.g. engineered cartilage or synthetic repair materials.

Tumor incidence in related hematopoietic stem cell donors.

Late malignancies have been discussed as a potential risk for growth factor mobilized donors of hematopoietic stem cells. Little is known about the incidence and potential risk factors. This single center retrospective cohort study evaluated all HLA-identical sibling pairs with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for a hematological malignancy, treated from 1974 to 2001 at the University Hospital of Basel. Three hundred eighteen pairs were identified, 291 donors (92%) could be contacted. Median observation time was 13.8 years (range 5-32 years). Sixteen (5%) donors had developed a total of 18 tumors, 17 recipients a secondary tumor. According to the age- and sex-adapted cancer incidence, 3.3 tumors in male and 6.8 in female donors were expected, 3 (relative risk (RR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.19-2.66) and 4 (RR: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.16-1.48), respectively, were found in donors between 0 and 49 years. Between 50 and 69 years, 4.5 tumors in males and 4.8 in females were expected, 5 (RR: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-2.59) and 6 (RR: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.67), respectively, were observed. Tumors do occur in donors of hematopoietic stem cells at least at the rate as expected in a normal population; whether incidence exceeds expected rates needs to be determined in larger international cohorts.

Social-ecological assessment of environments: toward a two-factor model.

A study was conducted to test the usefulness of the two-factor model in assessing social environments. Subjects were residents and staff at a residential treatment center for emotionally disturbed and/or delinquent boys and girls. Rating instruments consisted of (a) two parallel versions of Moos' Community-Oriented Programs Enivronment Scale (COPES), each worded so as to be appropriate to the setting being measured, and (b) global ratings of satisfaction with the environment. Principal component factor analyses, carried out separately on the youths' COPES-School and the youths' COPES-Cottage, yielded two orthogonal but similar factors in each environment. In a comparison with Moos' three-dimensional formulation of the social milieu, the two factors strongly resembled two of Moos' dimensions but were more independent, had greater validity, and discriminated between the two environments at a higher level of significance. The instruments derived from the factor analyses provide a simple procedure for assessing a variety of treatment programs and populations.

Cross-situational consistency among problem adolescents: an application of the two-factor model.

A study was conducted to measure cross-situational consistency of the orthogonal dimensions of the two-factor model of social-emotional functioning. According to this model, large proportions of variance in social-emotional functioning can be accounted for by two orthogonal, highly replicable dimensions. The setting was Hawthorne-Cedar Knolls, a long-term institution for emotionally disturbed and delinquent youths; the subjects were 206 residents of varied ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Cross-situational correlations between school and cottage settings were found to be .52 for Factor II (Cooperation-Compliance versus Anger-Defiance) and .42 for Factor I (Interest-Participation versus Apathy-Withdrawal). The results confirm the consistency and discriminant validity hypotheses--specifically, correlations between the corresponding factors of different instruments measuring behavior in different settings were large, whereas correlations between noncorresponding factors were very low. The value of using broad, higher order factors in personality research on the trait versus situation issue is discussed.