Methotrexate monotherapy versus methotrexate and apremilast combination therapy in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis: A prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a chronic debilitating condition which significantly impairs quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of apremilast and methotrexate compared with methotrexate monotherapy in the treatment of palmoplantar psoriasis. Also, to study the impact on treatment on the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Palmoplantar Quality of Life Index. METHODS: A total of 64 patients were randomised to two groups in a 1:1 ratio - Group A received both methotrexate and apremilast in combination, while Group B received only methotrexate, for 16 weeks. The primary endpoints were the mean score of Modified Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at week 16, the proportion of patients achieving modified palmoplantar psoriasis area severity index-75 and/or Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment score 0/1 at week 16. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients in Group A achieved Modified Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index-75 at week 16 (43% in Group A vs 30% in Group B). The Modified Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was significantly lower in the combination group at week 16 (4.03 ± 2.05 in Group A and 5.89 ± 2.31 in Group B, P-value = 0.002). About 80% of patients in the combination group with baseline Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment ≥3 achieved Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment 0/1 compared to 60% in Group B. The combination group showed a significantly higher reduction in Dermatology Life Quality Index and Palmoplantar Quality of Life Index scores compared to the methotrexate alone group (P-value = 0.025). No notable adverse events were observed. LIMITATION: The limitations of the study were single blinding, small sample size and a lack of longer follow up to assess the rate of relapse. We did not account for attrition during sample size calculation. Also, due to the paucity of data regarding the use of apremilast in palmoplantar psoriasis, definitive comparisons could not be made with previous studies. CONCLUSION: The combination of apremilast and methotrexate has superior efficacy and a similar safety profile as compared to methotrexate monotherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe palmoplantar psoriasis.

Comparison of efficacy of diode laser in patients of facial hirsutism with normal dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and dihydrotestosterone versus deranged dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and dihydrotestosterone level-A longitudinal study.

Hirsutism is defined as an excessive terminal hair growth in female over male pattern distribution areas. Traditional methods of hair removal have been replaced by lasers. The aim of the study was to observe the effect of diode laser in hirsutism patient with normal and deranged dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) level. Fifty patients of facial hirsutism with skin type IV and V were enrolled. Eighteen patients with deranged DHEAS and DHT level were allocated in group A whereas 16 patients with normal level were allocated in group B. Three sittings of diode laser was done in all subjects with varying session within a period of 6 months. At first follow-up visit, the percentage of hair reduction was fair in 62.5% of patients in group B and 16.7% of patients in group A, whereas at second follow-up visit, it was good in 56.3% of patients in group B and 11.1% of patients in group A. Increase in vellus hair and reduction in percentage of terminal hair were more significant in group B. Hair free interval and satisfaction level was significantly higher in group B. Diode laser is effective mode of treatment in hirsutism patient irrespective of hormone level. But, the effect is observed to be more efficacious in patients with normal DHEAS and DHT level.