Our experience with surgery in situs inversus: Open peptic perforation repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1 patient and 3 patients respectively.

INTRODUCTION: Situs inversus is a rare autosomal recessive condition associated with complete transposition of abdominal+/- thoracic organs. Surgical diagnosis and surgical procedures in patients with situs inversus is tricky because of the mirror image anatomy of intra-abdominal organs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2152 and 1497 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open peptic perforation repair respectively from June 2014-June 2016 was done. 1 patient and 3 patients with situs inversus underwent open peptic perforation repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy respectively. A 10mm left para-median port 5cm caudally from xiphoid was used for grasping the infundibulum. Two 5mm ports placed 10cm caudally from costal margin in the mid-clavicular and anterior axillary line were used for dissecting and retracting fundus respectively. A 10mm supra-umbilical camera port was used. RESULTS: A 40year male with situs inversus totalis underwent open peptic perforation repair. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in 3 female patients with situs inversus aged 33-46year (mean 41year). Mean operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 59min (39-93). There were no intraoperative or post-operative complications. Histopathology revealed chronic inflammation in peptic perforation and cholecystitis. CONCLUSION: Perforation peritonitis in situs inversus can cause diagnostic confusion with free gas under the left hemi diaphragm. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus is ergonomically inconvenient and technically difficult for right handed surgeons. We describe an ergonomically convenient port placement for right handed surgeons in situs inversus.

Primary hydatid cyst of pancreas: Case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Hydatid disease is caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus. It most commonly affects the liver and lung. Pancreatic hydatid cyst (PHC) is very rare with incidence of 0.14%-2%. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 40year old lady presented with epigastric pain for last 3 months. A 5×5cm abdominal lump occupying the epigastric and left hypochondrial region was noted on physical examination. Ultrasonography (USG) and Contrast enhanced Computed Tomogrpahy (CT) revealed a 55×57mm cystic structure in the pancreatic body. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fluid aspiration cytology revealed normal Carcinoembryonic antigen and Amylase levels. Cytological examination was noncontributory. During open surgical exploration, it was found to be a hydatid cyst. After irrigation with scolicidal agent and evacuation of cystic contents, Partial cystectomy with external drainage was done. Histopathological biopsy revealed Hydatid cyst. Post-operative ELISA (Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) for Echinococcal antigen was positive. DISCUSSION: PHC is a rare entity. Most common mode of spread is hematogenous. Cysts in pancreatic head can present as obstructive jaundice. Cysts in body and tail are usually asymptomatic. USG, CT and Hydaitd serology can help in diagnosis and monitoring recurrence. Surgical exploration is treatment of choice. Options include pericystectomy, partial cystectomy+/- external drainage/omentopexy, marsupialization or cysto-enterostomy. Preoperative and Post-operative anti helminthic (Albendazole) is recommended. CONCLUSION: PHC can masquerade as pseudocyst or cystic neoplasm of pancreas. It should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesion in patients from endemic regions.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a 2 year old male child with choleilithiasis and recurrent right hypochondrial pain: Case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gallstone disease has been considered an uncommon entity in children and infants, but its incidence is reportedly increasing which may be attributed to widespread use of diagnostic imaging (ultrasonography). PRESENTATION OF CASE: An apparently healthy 2 year old male child presented to our Outpatient department with chief complaint of recurrent abdominal pain. The episodes of pain were acute in onset and associated with vomiting. As per the complete examination and findings, a diagnosis of chronic calculous cholecystitis was made. A four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done. DISCUSSION: The incidence of gallstones in children in India has not been sufficiently studied. The incidence of gallstone disease in India was found to be 0.3% with the incidence in age group 0-10 being less than 0.1%. In contrast to adult gallstone disease, it has been found that there is no female preponderance in gallstone diseases of infancy. Also, the majority of children having increased haemoglobin turnover develop pigment stones only after 5 years of age. CONCLUSION: The probability of gallstone disease in infants and young children should not be ignored. Gall stones should always be considered as a differential diagnosis when young patients present with complaints of abdominal pain.